On 03-Dec-04, 07:52 (CST), Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why can't art be pornographic and porn be artistic anyway? >
I think the very definition of "pornography" (in the US, at least)
denies this possibility. If it's art, then it's "erotic", not
"pornography".
"Nitpickers R Us",
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
world. -- seen on the net
