Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 367743 pending
Bug#367743: firebird2-classic-server: must use invoke-rc.d
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> severity 367743 serious
Bug#367743: firebird2-classic-server: must use invoke-rc.d
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> t
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 23:32:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366223: fixed in simgear 0.3.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Jeroen van Wolffelaar schrieb:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:28:22PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>> When trying to install sun-java5-jdk, the installation failed with
>> "subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 10" for
>> sun-java5-bin. I have no idea what went wrong. T
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:28:22PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> When trying to install sun-java5-jdk, the installation failed with
> "subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 10" for
> sun-java5-bin. I have no idea what went wrong. This is the output
> from when I trie
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 22:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367651: fixed in powermanga 0.80-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: mesa-common-dev
Version: 6.4.1-0.4
Followup-For: Bug #362063
Here's the error message in English.
Unpacking mesa-common-dev (from .../mesa-common-dev_6.4.1-0.4_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/mesa-common-dev_6.4.1-0.4_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite
severity 367630 normal
thanks
hi benoit,
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:07:09PM +0200, Benoit Panizzon wrote:
> After Upgrading to 1.4 from backports I noticed the check_nagios plugin
> is missing so nagios cannot figure out if it is running. No controlling
> can be perfomed from the web-gui anymore.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 367630 normal
Bug#367630: nagios-plugins: check_nagios is missing
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Summary: The issue with wget.texi is that the GNU GPL is an Invariant
Section; since the GNU GPL cannot be modified anyway, this just forces
gpl.texi to always be distributed with wget.texi, even when you're
just distributing the manual.
The solution is to change "with the Invariant Sections bein
is debconf configured for non-interactive installation mode? If yes,
it's pretty clear, as the license is not yet accepted.
Michael Ablassmeier schrieb:
> severity 367504 serious
> thanks
>
> hi,
>
> the package fails to install on the first run here too:
>
> Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 08:31 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:56:33AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > > Thanks for the report. While I think that people who are admin can
> > > already do a lot of damage and should hence be considered trus
severity 367626 normal
tags 367626 + unreproducible
thanks
Tom Parker schrieb:
> Package: sun-java5-plugin
> Version: 1.5.0-06-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> sun-java5-plugin does not contain a plugin, and in fact only contains folders
> and symlinks as opposed
Am Mittwoch, den 17.05.2006, 19:04 +0200 schrieb Francesco Poli:
> I don't agree that GR-2006-001 outcome makes this a non-bug.
> AFAICS from the bug log, it seems that wget documentation
> includes invariant sections: hence GR-2006-001 restates
> its non-freeness.
Don explain the problem of this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 367626 normal
Bug#367626: sun-java5-plugin doesn't contain a plugin (or anything else)
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> tags 367626 + unreproducible
Bug#367626: sun-java5-plugin doesn't contain a plugin (or anything else)
There were no
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 19:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366243: fixed in nvidia-settings 1.0+20060404-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Package: linux-wlan-ng-source
Version: 0.2.4+svn20060414-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
[I'm setting this to severity: critical because it has the potential to
bring the kernel to a grinding halt.]
My apologies for raising the RC bug count. :)
I'm currently using a
Package: busybox-udeb
Version: 1:1.1.2-1
Severity: critical
# echo "Create" | tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]'
Segmentation fault
pgpuZaaO4XE6d.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 19:04:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Invalid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 15:17:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367341: fixed in monit 1:4.8.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 367714 serious
Bug#367714: busybox: umount -a not working
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> reassign 367714 busybox-udeb
Bug#367714: busybox: umount -a not working
B
tags 366961 + confirmed
thanks
* Daniel Kobras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
>
> When denying to use dbconfig-common on upgrade, the postinst script
> erases the values of $db_port, $db_name, $db_user, and $db_pass from
> /etc/bugzilla/localconfig. The values need to be filled in by hand from
> /e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 366961 + confirmed
Bug#366961: bugzilla: Upgrade erases db information from localconfig.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 367672 serious
Bug#367672: gnucash: stay out of testing until 2.0 release
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
Package: libnotify
Severity: serious
Version: 0.4.0-1
Hi,
While trying to build Rhythmbox today, I got:
bpangoft2-1.0.so /usr/lib/libglade-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so
/usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so
/usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so -l
Hi Julien
NMU as you want.
Thanks for your help.
--
Jean-Michel Kelbert
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: freeradius
Version: 1.1.0-1.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my freeradius 1.1.0-1.2 NMU. I plan to upload
shortly.
Thanks,
--
-
| ,''`.Stephen Gra
reopen 323099
thanks.
I don't agree that GR-2006-001 outcome makes this a non-bug.
AFAICS from the bug log, it seems that wget documentation
includes invariant sections: hence GR-2006-001 restates
its non-freeness.
P.S.:
I'm Cc:ing debian-legal, please keep Cc:ing it when replying
to the bug e-m
在 2006/5/17 下午 7:02 時，Pierre HABOUZIT 寫到：
ping, any progress here ? we have an RC bug that could have been
solved 1 month ago rotting, that's not good. Do you have anything
coming
?
I have been working on several other important issues with upstream
authors, and I known they will make a
Package: linux-kernel-di-alpha-2.6
Version: 0.05
Severity: serious
Can someone please update Alpha to 2.6.16.
> Automatic build of linux-kernel-di-alpha-2.6_0.05 on juist by sbuild/alpha
> 0.44
...
> Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tre
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 359042 + fixed
Bug#359042: [CVE-2006-1354] EAP-MSCHAPv2 vulnerability
Tags were: patch fixed-upstream security
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 321102 kmail loses mails
Bug#321102: kmail looses mails
Changed Bug title.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSU
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 22:17:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#189422: Hijacking bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 189422 texinfo-doc-nonfree
Bug#189422: texinfo: must include full GFDL in copyright file
Bug reassigned from package `texinfo' to `texinfo-doc-nonfree'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 367704 + confirmed fixed-upstream
Bug#367704: Initial install fails
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, fixed-upstream
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Package: interchange
Severity: serious
Version: 5.4.0-1
Initial install of Interchange fails. The template interchange/debug is
referenced
in the maintainer scripts, but the template itself has been removed.
With regards
Racke
--
LinuXia Systems => http://www.linuxia.de/
Expert Interch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 323099
Bug#323099: wget: non-free documentation [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL-1.2]
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks.
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 10:17:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354113: fixed in tex-common 0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 05:48:37PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> This is a wishlist bug, but please consider it as important. There is a
> Debian package of ffmpeg, with shared versions of the library. Please
> build libxine1 against this package, so that libxine-based applications
> benefit of
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 09:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367640: fixed in anjuta 2.0.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Just in case the maintainers didn't find the cause yet, this looks like
a result of #365085, given that sqlite3 Build-Deps on cdbs, the moment
the last upload happened, and that this bug doesn't exist in stable. The
only other easy verification I didn't do is to check whether 3.3.5-0.1
was righ
# I'm sorry, I must be on crack today.
# This is the second time *today* that I screwed up like this.
package nowebm
reassign 339385 netperf
package netperf
severity 339385 normal
retitle 339385 netperf: no "example/" directory included
# Now do the right thing.
package ifupdown
reassign 339835 now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # I'm sorry, I must be on crack today.
> # This is the second time *today* that I screwed up like this.
> package nowebm
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: nowebm
> reassign 339385 netperf
Bug#339385: nowebm: must Conflict: original-awk
Bug reassigned from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 367647 serious
Bug#367647: Missing library dependency
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
El 17/05/2006, a las 15:47, Clint Adams escribió:
Any NMU will be welcome. I've tried some time ago to build with
the 0.44 debian/* without problems. But since then, I didn't have
time for Debian (a lot of work, and even i currently don't have a
x86 (mi actual iMac only have a very preliminary s
There appears to have been some ambiguity with the vulnerability
announcements, with some sites saying PHP 5.1.2 and prior
PHP 4.4.2 and prior
(http://securityreason.com/achievement_securityalert/34) and others just
saying PHP 5.1.2 and 4.4.2
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/430449/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 339385 nowebm
Bug#339385: netperf: no "example/" directory included
Bug reassigned from package `netperf' to `nowebm'.
> severity 339385 serious
Bug#339385: netperf: no "example/" directory included
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> r
Alec Berryman wrote:
> Package: freeradius
> Followup-For: Bug #359042
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Attached dpatch is reformatted from revision 1.11 of
> src/modules/rlm_eap/types/rlm_eap_mschapv2/rlm_eap_mschapv2.c.
>
> The fix applies and compiles, but I have not do
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 365163 + fixed
Bug#365163: pload: FTBFS with new X packages: Cannot find -lXaw
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> retitle 184922 poppassd: should provide actual PAM error
Bug#184922: texinfo: must include full GFDL in copyright file
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 189422 texinfo: must include full
Here is more information on the crash in pan. This is with the 0.96-1
from people.d.o.
Full backtrace, including gtk and glib debugging symbols is attached,
gzip'd, since it's 33k. Hopefully, this helps. If you need the core
file or anything else from it, please let me know; otherwise, I'll
del
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 320115 + fixed
Bug#320115: qiv: background setting in bug #294293 causes X session to become
useless
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
> Any NMU will be welcome. I've tried some time ago to build with
> the 0.44 debian/* without problems. But since then, I didn't have
> time for Debian (a lot of work, and even i currently don't have a
> x86 (mi actual iMac only have a very preliminary support in kernel
> 2.6.16).
Do you still hav
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 152473 + sid
Bug#152473: toolame: creates stereo only
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> tag 152791 + sid
Bug#152791: miscfiles: typos in constitution
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> tag 162663 + sid
Bug#162663: libc0.3-dev: depen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 322853 + fixed
Bug#322853: FTBFS: Unable to find libpq-fe.h
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 356739 + fixed
Bug#356739: libdbi-drivers: Please upgrade build depends to libmysqlclient15-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 367194 pending
Bug#367194: FTBFS: missing build-depends on debhelper
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Hi,
monit-4.8.1 was released yesterday ...
Martin
Stefan Alfredsson wrote:
(forwarding for reference. In summary - monit needs to be compiled on
amd64 for the patch to be effective. It fails when started from
initscripts but works with manual start -- I'll await 4.8.1 before doing
further inv
tags 367194 pending
thanks
> As trivial at it looks, here is the patch that should fix the issue:
Actually, I had commited a fix, but forgot to tag the bug accordingly.
The fix completely changes Build-Depends-Indep in
Build-Depends...because the dependency on po-debconf is needed as we
run dh_
tags 367642 +pending
thanks
Frederik Schüler said:
> Package: amaya
> Version: 9.51-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Yeah, I know, already noticed it. I guess I shouldn't trust upstream when
they say they applied my patches... Well,
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 08:31 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:56:33AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > Thanks for the report. While I think that people who are admin can
> > already do a lot of damage and should hence be considered trusted,
> > executing php code is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 367642 +pending
Bug#367642: amaya_9.51-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS on 64bit architectures: error:
cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Package: powermanga
Version: 0.80-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
powermanga doesn't start :
linuxroutines/chargeFichier() : can't locate file : texts/text_en.txt
Christian
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT polic
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:22:17PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 08:08:41AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > I'm curious why you copied me on this email, since I never touched the
> > bug being closed.
>
> That was just to inform you that I'm doing an NMU on t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 189422 -1
Bug#189422: allow pointers to info docs for licenses like GFDL that apply to
them
Bug 189422 cloned as bug 367650.
> reassign 189422 texinfo
Bug#189422: allow pointers to info docs for licenses like GFDL that apply to
them
Bug reassig
Package: regexxer
Version: 0.8-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Simply crashes on startup
% regexxer
(regexxer:15845): libglade-WARNING **: could not find widget creation
function
(regexxer:15845): Gtk-WARNING **: gtk_scrolled_window_add(): cannot add
non scrollable wid
Package: sqlite3
Version: 3.3.5-0.2
Severity: grave
The sqlite3 package lacks a dependency on libsqlite3-0.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: amaya
Version: 9.51-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -O2 -Wall -x c++ -D__cplusplus -D_UNIX -D_GL -D_WX
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I../../amaya/xpm -I../../thotlib/include
> -I../../thotlib/internals/var -I../.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 357228 + fixed
Bug#357228: adduser-ng: FTBFS: bad xalan options
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:48:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:55:35PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
>
> > >* Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-20 13:08]:
> > >>When adding this patch, it still fails:
>
> > >>creating chewing-imengine-setup.la
> > >>/bin/sed: ca
(forwarding for reference. In summary - monit needs to be compiled on
amd64 for the patch to be effective. It fails when started from
initscripts but works with manual start -- I'll await 4.8.1 before doing
further investigations)
//Stefan
Original Message ---
Package: anjuta
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of anjuta_2.0.2-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.2.0), cdbs, libpcre3-dev,
> l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 354571 pending
Bug#354571: RM: gngeo -- RoAM; license problems
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 03:32:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362575: fixed in amaya 9.51-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: nagios-plugins
Version: 1.4.2-4bpo1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After Upgrading to 1.4 from backports I noticed the check_nagios plugin
is missing so nagios cannot figure out if it is running. No controlling
can be perfomed from the web-gui anymore.
-Benoit-
El 17/05/2006, a las 1:37, Clint Adams escribió:
From http://www.harbour-project.org/
Harbour News
2005-06-27
* Release of Alpha build 45
Any NMU will be welcome. I've tried some time ago to build with
the 0.44 debian/* without problems. But since then, I didn't have
time for Debian (a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 363277 + fixed
Bug#363277: gnuserv: FTBFS: conflicting types for 'strerror'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Package: sun-java5-plugin
Version: 1.5.0-06-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
sun-java5-plugin does not contain a plugin, and in fact only contains folders
and symlinks as opposed to any useful content.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 11:31:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 11:30:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 11:31:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Hi Benjamin,
I have just uploaded a NMU of gnuserv fixing this bug.
Patch is attached.
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
.''`. Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid
`- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
diff -u gnuserv-3.12.7/debian/c
Le Mer 17 Mai 2006 05:30, Adam Porter a écrit :
> On Tuesday 16 May 2006 11:03, Christopher Martin wrote:
> > Perhaps a better solution would be disable dimap support in the
> > 3.5.3 upload, and make sure that the fixed package makes Etch
> > (which is looming). Daniel, what do you feel about this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 335719 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#335719: etw_3.0.cvs20050714-1(m68k/experimental): missing uudecode
Tags were: fixed patch
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Package: expect
Version: 5.43.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear 'expect' maintainers,
expect is linked against libexpect5.43.so which must be included in the
program package (not in the development package).
Thanks and best regards,
Bernd
-- System Information:
Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 367559 important
Bug#367559: tetex-base: Package cannot be installed: fmtutil failed
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
severity 367559 important
stop
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 22:16 -0400, Loris Bennett wrote:
>> Package: tetex-base
>> Version: 3.0-17
>> Severity: critical
I'm setting this to important, because it isn't a teTeX bug, as Ralf
pointed out, and we don't know y
85 matches
Mail list logo
