Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 22:17:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#189422: Hijacking bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: texinfo
Version: 4.3-1
Severity: serious
Debian Policy section 13.5 states:
Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright
and distribution license in the file
`/usr/share/doc/<package>/copyright'. This file must neither be
compressed nor be a symbolic link.
The GNU Free Documentation License is not included, except as a
reference to both the Emacs manual and the Texinfo manual.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux stonewall 2.4.20-1-k7 #1 Sat Mar 22 15:17:52 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
Versions of packages texinfo depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
--
Brian M. Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x560553e7
"Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable. Let us prepare
to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it
after all." --Douglas Adams
pgp1ANjgdatxb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
reassign 189422 texinfo-doc-nonfree
stop
> I would appreciate if you are going to change the topic of a bug, that
> you clone it and mark the submitter as yourself.
I would appreciate if you change this back after years, that you check
whether the package name is still correct, and whether it still
applies. It doesn't.
> In future, please clone bugs where the bug in question is not actually
> in some other package (it is not here) or when the proposed solution
> implies a change with which the original submitter may not agree (a
> simple email would have told you that).
I do agree with that.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
--- End Message ---
