On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:22:17PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote: > Hi Justin, > > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 08:08:41AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > I'm curious why you copied me on this email, since I never touched the > > bug being closed. > > That was just to inform you that I'm doing an NMU on top of your NMU > while your NMU is not yet acknowledged by the maintainer. > http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/qiv/news/20060116T193223Z.html > http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/qiv.html Oh, heh. It was only partially mine, since it was a "sponsored nmu" :)
BTW, you may have the opportunity to do a test on the Katie code; an NMU NMU shouldn't "close" the previously "fixed" bugs, but only leave them as fixed; if you use dpkg-buildpackage -v<version before my nmu>, that bug should be untouched (perhaps being retagged, or "closed" again, but only for the same version as it was "closed", I think). Cheers, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
