Package: installation-reports
Boot method: VirtualBox 7.0.26 using d-i .iso as a Bootable CD-ROM device
Image version:
https://gemmei.ftp.acc.umu.se/cdimage/trixie_di_rc1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-trixie-DI-rc1-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 2025-05-26 21:00 UTC
Machine: VirtualBox, host running on Linux Bo
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #762287,
regarding Debian Jessie installer report and problems
Ah okay thank you for the information. I'm pretty new to mailing lists
and I really don't send emails that much in general. I'm emailing from
claws-mail and I thought using Reply-To was proper due to my
misjudgement from seeing it in your reply haha.
However before you close this I have some oth
[ Please keep the bug report in Cc in your replies. ]
Tom (2014-09-20):
> Cyril, Dvorak is included in the installer as an option. Colemak is
> supported on Debian and seems to be included by default as well. I can
> use it by performing "dpkg-reconfigure keyboard-configuration" but my
> issue
[ Keeping the bug report in the loop; please don't send mail to me only. ]
Tom (2014-09-20):
> Sep 20 14:11:14 main-menu[216]: INFO: Menu item 'ethdetect' selected
> Sep 20 14:11:14 kernel: [ 53.635688] r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver
> 2.3LK-NAPI loaded
> Sep 20 14:11:14 kernel: [ 53.635705]
Hi Tom,
and thanks for your report.
Tom (2014-09-20):
> Comments/problems:
>
> I had 2 issues with the installation:
>
> 1. I use the colemak keyboard layout and there was no option in the
> installer for colemak. See: http://colemak.com/
I don't think we're going to include support for exot
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: usb
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: September 20th, 10:00
Machine: HP Pavillion g7 (I don't know the exact model)
Processor: Intel i3 M 370 clocked at 2.4ghz
Memory: 6GB
P
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #399244
has caused the Debian Bug report #399244,
regarding installer report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #344537
has caused the Debian Bug report #344537,
regarding Alpha GUI installer report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #328565
has caused the Debian Bug report #328565,
regarding testing installer report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #249313
has caused the Debian Bug report #249313,
regarding [d-i-alpha] debian-installer report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #286157
has caused the Debian Bug report #286157,
regarding installer report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #283060
has caused the Debian Bug report #283060,
regarding Debian-installer report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #283116
has caused the Debian Bug report #283116,
regarding Debian Installer Report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #281667
has caused the Debian Bug report #281667,
regarding Debian-Installer report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #278085
has caused the Debian Bug report #278085,
regarding debian-installer report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #272443
has caused the Debian Bug report #272443,
regarding Sarge installer report - SATA drives not detected on Sis180 chip,
Asus p4s800d-e board
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #269208
has caused the Debian Bug report #269208,
regarding Installer report (sparc)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #265793
has caused the Debian Bug report #265793,
regarding debian-installer report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst cdrom
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc1/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: Sat Nov 18 18:25:10 CET 2006
Machine: home-built pc: MSI K8N-neo4 motherboard with nforce4 chipset
Processor: AMD64 3200+
Memory
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 07:23:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386762: INSTALLER REPORT
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: debian-31r3-i386-netinst.iso from the debian WEB site obtained on September 7, 2006.
uname -a: Linux Gandalf-Debian 2.4.27-3-386 #1 Mon May 29 23:50:41 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Installed September 8, 2006.
Method: How did
reassign 368329 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
thanks
> But I noticed a few irregularities with the italics. As the attached
> image (partman_choose_partition_ko.png) shows, some Korean letters
> have their italics reversed (the letters that are underlined in red).
> The two lines above "Software RAID" should
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 368329 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Bug#368329: Graphical Installer report for Korean
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `cdebconf-gtk-udeb'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 22:40, Gene Lake wrote:
> Everything went well except the install of GRUB to the root partition.
> I have had this problem installing GRUB with every Debian install I've
> done (using the new installer). The initial attempt always fails. I
> can go back and re-select 'in
Package: installation-reports
Boot method:
downloaded CD
Image version:d/l
from Debian.installer.page daily build of AMD64 netinst.iso dated
04-10-2006
Date:
afternoon on 4-10-2006
Machine:
special order computer from
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:13:53PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Thx for your answer.
No problem with closing the 'bug' since it was only a report. Anyway
I'd like to make a few remarks.
> > * During the installation various messages where shown that several
> > modules could not be loaded. I guess
Your message dated Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:13:53 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#288974: Debian installer report: i386, d-i RC2, 2004-12-29
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a:
Linux belanna 2.6.9.200501060123 #1 Thu Jan 6 01:51:46 CET 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
(the original kernel was 2.6.8-1-386)
Date:
200
: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:03:03 -0800
Subject: Bug#286157: Acknowledgement (installer report)
Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message
has
been received. It is being forwarded to the package maintaine
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-12-12
uname -a: didn't get that far
Date: 2004-12-17
Method: boot from cd rom (businesscard image)
Machine: IBM Netvista model 2194-18A
Processor: PIII
Memory: 378Mb
Root Device: IDE disk
Root Size/partition table: around 12Mb
Output of
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 08:11:21AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Comments/Problems:
> > Installing worked fine until the reboot, whereafter it could not find
> > the IDE hard drive. Power-cycling fixed this, so I imagine it is a
> > problem with the power management. Have been recommended to
> Comments/Problems:
> Installing worked fine until the reboot, whereafter it could not find
> the IDE hard drive. Power-cycling fixed this, so I imagine it is a
> problem with the power management. Have been recommended to compile
It's quite likely, yes
> custom kernel with APM, so going to try
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
uname -a:
Date:
Method:
Machine: IBM Thinkpad 570 2644 3AU
Processor: 366 MHz PII
Memory: 128MB
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table: Root = 6.1Gb, Swap = 301MB
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O]
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: <2004-11-24>
uname -a:
Date: <2004-11-24>
Method: Install on CD boot.
Machine:
Processor: Pentium-M
Memory: 256MB
Root Device:
Root Size/partition table:
Result of fdisk -l /dev/hda
Disk /dev/hda: 40.0 GB, 40007761920
On Monday 22 November 2004 11:10, Chris Lale wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 23:04, Frans Pop wrote:
> > reassign 281924 netcfg
> > severity 281924 minor
> > retitle 281924 Ask for nameservers if missing from DHCP
> > thanks
> >
> > There are probably quite a few of these routers with build-in dhcp
On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 23:04, Frans Pop wrote:
> reassign 281924 netcfg
> severity 281924 minor
> retitle 281924 Ask for nameservers if missing from DHCP
> thanks
>
> There are probably quite a few of these routers with build-in dhcp servers
> around that do not supply nameserver addresses in thei
reassign 281924 netcfg
severity 281924 minor
retitle 281924 Ask for nameservers if missing from DHCP
thanks
There are probably quite a few of these routers with build-in dhcp servers
around that do not supply nameserver addresses in their default
configuration.
Would it be possible to check if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 281924 netcfg
Bug#281924: Debian-installer report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `netcfg'.
> severity 281924 minor
Bug#281924: Debian-installer report
Severity set to `minor'.
> retitle 28192
- Forwarded message from Chris Lale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Chris Lale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:17:10 +
To: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#281924: Debian-installer report
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Hello Joey.
On Thu
Chris Lale wrote:
> Perhaps this is an omission rather than an error. I could not install when I
> configured the network
> with DHCP. The installation hung trying to fetch packages from the mirror. I
> suspect this was because
> it had not asked me for my ISP's nameservers.
dhcp should provid
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
15th November 2004,
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/
uname -a: Linux thinkpad 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Nov 11 12:18:43 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 16th November 23:31
Method: Boo
> Other thoughts during installation:
>
> - The messages at several stages of the install, that some drivers are
> not available at the moment, are irritating; thought first something
> went wrong.
You were in expert modeyou got the information you implicitely
asked for..:-)
> - Missed an
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20041115/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux gw 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Nov 11 12:18:43 EST 2004 i586
GNU/Linux
Date: 16-Nov-2004
Method: Installation from boot cd-rom, booting from Li
isn't
possible.
Because of that I thougt about providing a better debian-installer
report-template webpage:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/report-template.en.html
Is it possible to make this page a form which sends the corresponding email
behind the scenes?
Or could we at least provi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (A trivial point - I did notice that /floppy symlink to /media/floppy0 is
> missing).
Such a symlink would be a FHS violation and it's bad enough that we were
not able to entirely get rid of the fhs violating /cdrom symlink for
this release. There should be no reason fo
Your message dated Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:19:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280842: Installer Report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso (daily build 10-11-04)
uname -a:
Linux localhost 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Oct 7 02:21:16 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 11-11-04 6pm
Method: Installed from sarge snapshot CD's (08-11-04), booted from
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
23-Oct-2004 23:10
uname -a: Linux konishi 2.4.27-1-k7 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:21:29 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: from Oct 24 18:59:37 to
7 -0300 (BRT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 02:01:27 -0300 (BRT)
From: Jacson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: debian-installer report
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=32346719.1092027687094.JavaMail.nobody.webmail3
Your message dated Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:40:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273024: debian installer report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: netinst RC1 cd image 23-Sept 2004 0800 CST
uname -a: Linux audit01 2.4.26-1-386 #1 Thu July 22 12:46:23 JST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 23-Sept 2004 0900 CST
Method: CD Image, local CD drive (/dev/hdc)
Machine: Dell Latitude C610 Laptop
Proces
The dvd image dated from Sept 18th that I downloaded with jigdo exhibits
the same problem. No drives or partitions are detected.
I still can't find lspci.
James
James Todd wrote:
Hi Joey,
I tried lspci, but it doesn't appear to be in the path of the shell I
get to via alt-f2 when booting through
Hi Joey,
I tried lspci, but it doesn't appear to be in the path of the shell I
get to via alt-f2 when booting through the install off of the dvd image.
Searching the contents of the dvd doesn't turn it up either. (I'm
presuming it's a command accessible from the shell. Let me know if
that's not
James Todd wrote:
> Version: 2-Sep-2004 sarge snapshot (dvd)
>
> During both a default installation and a linux26 installation, the
> problem occurs at the partitioning stage. Manual partitioning is the
> only option because no drives or partitions are detected. The drives are
> known to be fun
Package: debian-installer
Version: 2-Sep-2004 sarge snapshot (dvd)
Greetings,
I'm running the installer off of a dvd 'testing' image from 2-Sep-2004
on a machine with an Asus P4S800D-E deluxe board and two SATA Western
Digital drives connected to the board via the Sis180 chip's sata ports.
Proce
Your message dated Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:23:45 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#271547: Installer Report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 09-06-04
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/
uname -a: Linux hardscope 2.6.7-1-386 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:08:04 EDT 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 09-13-04
Method: NET install BOOT cdrom ftp.us.debian.org no proxie
Machine: Winb
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: rc1, 2 Aug 2004, from ftp.debian.org.
uname -a: Linux eclipse 2.4.26-sparc64 #1 Sun Jun 20 02:39:17 PDT 2004 sparc64
GNU/Linux
Date: 30 Aug 2004
Method: CD-ROM installer (using cdrom-mini.iso), followed by net install
(ht
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: daily build 17 august
uname -a: Linux fozzie 2.4.26-1-generic #1 Tue Aug 3 22:46:34 CEST 2004 alpha GNU/Linux
Date: 20 August 2004
Method:
Netinst CD then packages from mirror
Machine: Alpha PC164SX
Processor: PCA56
Memory
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: rc1, downloaded from ftp.au.debian.org.
uname -a: Linux metebelis 2.4.26-r4k-ip22 #1 Sun Jul 18 20:49:31 UTC 2004
mips GNU/Linux
Date: Sun Aug 15, 5pm GMT+10
Method: Installed over a serial console (no keyboard or mo
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: "sarge-i386-1-20040807.iso" of size 678461440 bytes from
www.debian.org, downloaded at 2004-08-14.
uname -a: Linux starfall 2.6.7-1-386 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:08:04 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-08-15.
Method: Boot from iso, i
Subject: debian-installer: report on laptop HP nc6000
From: mario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 19:47:49 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.92.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-
mario wrote:
> :02:0e.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme
> BCM5705M_2 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 03)
> The module tg3 supports the Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5705M_2 Gigabit NIC,
> but it was not loaded automatically. Once selected manually from the
> module list which d-i showed me
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-08-07 around 15:00 CEST netinst from
cdimage.debian.org/cdimage-testing/daily/i386
uname -a: Linux phonic 2.6.7-1-686 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:36:53 EDT 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-08-07 around 15:30 CEST
Method: booted from netinst CD. No p
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 08/08/2004 got image from www.debian.org
uname -a: Linux SpaceTop 2.6.7 #2 SMP Sun Aug 8 19:37:43 BRT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Aug 8 14:00 +/-
Method: I had install through cd net-inst with my ADSL connection at home no pro
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040729 sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: not able to run
Date: 20040729 late evening CDT (US)
Method: downloaded iso, burned to CDROM, booted CDROM
Machine: MB- Gigabyte GA-8KNXP Rev.2
Processor: Intel P4 2.8c (not overclocked)
Memory: 1 GB
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040716/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux pitr.localdomain.bogus 2.6.6-1-k7 #1 Wed May 12 18:19:40
EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: July 16, 2004
Method: Net Install
L PROTECTED]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:34:33 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gahide_J=E9r=F4me?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian installer report
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:34:32 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type:
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:07:38AM -0400, Joshua Wise wrote:
> When I went to install the base system, I ran out of room on the
> compactflash. This is understandable - after all, it is only 128MB.
> I'm not quite certain why we are installing exim or other things like
> it by default, however. Exi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 01 July 2004 10:41 am, Joey Hess wrote:
> Joshua Wise wrote:
> > Debian-installer-version: 2004/07/01 0100EDT - netboot images - "current"
> Define "current" with an URL please.
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-
Joshua Wise wrote:
> Debian-installer-version: 2004/07/01 0100EDT - netboot images - "current"
Define "current" with an URL please.
> When I went to detect the hard drives using the netboot stuff, the modules for
> IDE were not there. This does not seem like a sane default to me.
> Additionally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004/07/01 0100EDT - netboot images - "current"
uname -a:
Date: 2004/07/01 0155EDT
Method: I netbooted, using network as an installation source and a 128MB CF as
a target.
Machine: VIA EPIA ME
Hi Debian Install Team
Today, for the first time in my life, I had the fealing that
was once described as "standing on the shoulders of Giants". I used
the installer to install sarge with pxeboot on a Soekris net4801 with
a blanco harddisk. It almost went without a glitch. Four points:
the
Your message dated Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:26:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255549: debian-installer report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/200406018/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
(Daily build net install from, June 18, 2004)
uname -a:
Linux deacon 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Da
Hi Martin,
I've download the i386 iso file and test it.
Everything seems to work fine now. I didn't install the system because I
have already installed a testing debian by upgrading a woody.
With the ash shell I didn't found the lspci command.
So I run the lsmod and I can see that sk98lin is l
* John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-18 03:02]:
> First problem: no support for my network card. The latest 2.6.x-rc series
> has a forcedeth module which is needed for my integrated Ethernet. This module
> is also available as a patch for 2.4.x, but this machine is, in general,
> Much Hap
* Gahide Jérôme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-04 12:34]:
> When I try to partition my HDD, the installer do not want to lunch,
> and when I want to mount existing partition the installer do
> nothing.Also when I want to load the network module for my
> integrated network card 3com 1000 (module sk98l
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 07:17:58PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > After this I typed "df" in the console just to see what was happening and I
> > saw that I got about 100 000TB in hard drive and about 6 000TB in an shm
> > partition !!
> When you type "df", you get 1K blocks. So 10 wou
On Sunday 16 May 2004 21:45, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * B. Peccatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 21:41]:
> > No there isn't
> > Theres is format, don't format, use as swap, and don't use.
>
> Strange. Which version of debian-installer did you use? Which
> install image?
The one on ftp.crihan
* B. Peccatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 21:41]:
> No there isn't
> Theres is format, don't format, use as swap, and don't use.
Strange. Which version of debian-installer did you use? Which
install image?
> > When you type "df", you get 1K blocks. So 10 would be 100 MB.
> > Can you s
On Sunday 16 May 2004 20:17, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * B. Peccatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 19:20]:
> > Then its comes to partitionning, first the help on lvm isn't
> > translated in french
>
> Which help do you mean?
The one named partitioning drives with partman.
> > Then I couldn't in
* B. Peccatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 19:20]:
> Then its comes to partitionning, first the help on lvm isn't
> translated in french
Which help do you mean?
> Then I couldn't install in lvm because I couldn't find any way to
> create a physical volume. I chose to partition the disk by hand
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 249313 "B. Peccatte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#249313: [d-i-alpha] debian-installer report
Changed Bug submitter from Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to "B. Peccatte"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> --
Package: installation-reports
- Forwarded message from "B. Peccatte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "B. Peccatte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian-installer report
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 19:20:12 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
I t
I tried to install an alpha station using the debian installer. Here are the
problems I noticed. Note that I still can't get to the end of the
installation process.
Note that I've got a 1GB hard drive and 72MB of RAM and I'm using the french
translation for installation.
I want to boot from n
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 21:49:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#245077: Debian installer report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 12:55:15PM +0200, Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
> Debian-installer-version: Beta 3, 100 MB CD image, downloaded on 19
> Apr 2004 from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
[...]
> I've been having a minor problem though: the GRUB boot screen doesn't
> show any entry for bo
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Beta 3, 100 MB CD image, downloaded on 19
Apr 2004 from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
uname -a:
Linux pc-ballabio 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 20 Apr 2004 in the morni
1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Debian Installer report
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_
com.au (unknown [210.8.121.82])
by caffeine.cc.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id B180D1FED1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 13:27:49 +1000 (EST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 703 invoked by uid 0);
Sat, 17 Apr 2004 03:36:10 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Debian
Package: Installation-reportsDebian
Installer Version: Beta 3 Floppies (Boot,root and Net-drivers 20040314 from ftp.nz.debian.org)
Date: Midnight 17 March 04 NZDT
Method: boot from locally rewritten floppies -
(tested on an ASUS L3500D - worked fine)
Machine: Acernote Nuovo 970MMX
Processor
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Beta 2, from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux peanutmuncher 2.4.24-1-686 #1 Wed Feb 18 21:59:13 EST 2004
i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 8 Mar 04, 01:00
Method: booted from the CD on a d
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2 march 2004 rsync://ftp.fsn.hu/cdimages/debian-unofficial/ and ftp.mpi-sb.mpg.deuname -a: Linux(none) 2.4.24-1-386 #1 WED Feb 18 19:44:56 EST 2004 i686 unknown
Date: 2 march 2004
Method: CD install.
Machine: Personal PC with Asuz KT600
P
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: beta 2 as of 2/17/2004
uname -a: Linux katherina 2.6.3-rc4 #1 Wed Feb 18 03:33:08 CST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Feb 17, 2004
Method: CD
Machine: Compaq Presario 8000Z, Athlon64 3200+, NForce3 motherboard
Processor: AMD
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:53:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229423: Debian Installer Report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:31:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230279: Installer report for HP Omnibook 6000
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-01-02,
ftp://ftp.r-net.sk/pub/linux/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot-initrd.gz
uname -a:
Date: 2004-01-28, 17:00 CET
Method: network, via PXE from a local machine running Debian Woody
Machine: HP Omnibook 6
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 02:10:32PM -0500, Nick Fotopoulos wrote:
> First I tried the business card .iso. It seemed to install the base system
> correctly. After choosing a kernel, however, it would return me to choosing
> the kernel again and again. Attempts to choose later options (finish
> con
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
