Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Christian, any chance you'd be able to test this out in d-i? My main d-i
> box remains an alpha w/o bterm support.
Hmmm, maybe but I can't promise anything. My week-end will have few
windows for hacking.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
The attached patch is a proof-of-concept of fixing the muddled Arabic
displays in partman using Unicode bidi control characters. It's not
comprehensive, and it's actually not suitable for use as-is because the two
strings involved are still inconsistent in their handling of the text
"SCSI"; but it
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 07:21:40PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> While the rules regarding bidi transitions are rather complex (and setting
> aside for the moment the inconsistency of whether or not to translate
> "SCSI"), it's clear that these translation's can't *both* be right: the
> parenthese
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 05:08:16PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 07:38:19AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> >
> > The attached screen captures show the main partman screen and the partition
> > aditiing screen during an Arabic install. As you may see, the display is
> >
Joey Hess wrote:
> Jan Medlock wrote:
>> I tried the d-i daily for 23 Nov 2004, which seems to use the same
>> kernel source (2.6.8-1) and, thus, has the same problem. Can anyone
>> confirm this is the case?
>
> IIRC this is a known problem with the 2.6.8 kernel and it's fixed in
> the newest kern
Ce jour Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Sven Luther a dit:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:55:30PM +, Clive Menzies wrote:
> > On (26/11/04 22:39), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > reassign #283142 debian-installer
> > > thanks
> > installer and may have imagined I saw "vmlinuz" and unfortunately I
> > didn't ha
Accepted:
brltty-modules-2.4.27-1-386-di_1.01_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386/brltty-modules-2.4.27-1-386-di_1.01_i386.udeb
brltty-modules-2.4.27-speakup-di_1.01_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386/brltty-modules-2.4.27-speakup-di_1.01_i386.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4
Accepted:
base-config_2.60.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.60.dsc
base-config_2.60.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.60.tar.gz
base-config_2.60_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.60_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribu
linux-kernel-di-i386_1.01_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-i386_1.01.dsc
linux-kernel-di-i386_1.01.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386-di_1.01_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.27-1-386-di_1.01_i386.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.4.27-1-386-di_1.01_i386
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 284112 grub
Bug#284112: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `grub'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
See the forwarded mail from debian-ia64 for some details. I notice that
rootskel has some code for powerpc to modprobe i8042 and atkbd on
chrp|chrp_pegasos|prep. Seems we should do this for ia64 too, but I'm
puzzled how that manages to get the modules loaded after these system
reboot, since it does
- Forwarded message from Emeric Maschino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Emeric Maschino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 03 Dec 2004 10:08:43 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sarge debian-installer
Organization:
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5)
Hello,
Am I the only one having probl
base-config_2.60_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.60.dsc
base-config_2.60.tar.gz
base-config_2.60_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Rejected: base-config_2.59_i386.changes: a file with this name already exists
in the Done directory.
Rejected: base-config_2.59_all.deb: old version (2.59) in unstable >= new
version (2.59) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: base-config_2.59_all.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in
the
Accepted:
base-config_2.53.5.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.53.5.dsc
base-config_2.53.5.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.53.5.tar.gz
base-config_2.53.5_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.53.5_all.deb
Closing bugs: 282632
Thank you for your contri
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 283983 rootskel
Bug#283983: installation-reports: ia64 rc2 businesscard w/ 2.6 kernel
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `rootskel'.
>
End of message, stop
Ce jour Fri, 03 Dec 2004, Holger Levsen a dit:
i'd appreciate not having it hijacked from under me. i don't mind
getting help, and i do appreciate that, but i get the feeling it's being
hijacked from me. you could at least tell me WTF is going on.
eric
(the current quik maintainer)
--
Microsoft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello fellow translators,
Currently the Portuguese and Spanish translations of the installation
manual are somewhat outdated:
es: 21 files not up-to-date
pt_BR : 58 files not up-to-date
(The other languages are fairly up-to-date AFAICT. Not sur
base-config_2.53.5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.53.5.dsc
base-config_2.53.5.tar.gz
base-config_2.53.5_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
base-config_2.59_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.59.dsc
base-config_2.59.tar.gz
base-config_2.59_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Ce jour Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Colin Watson a dit:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:58:48AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > and, better not to forget, the new quik.deb is available at
> > http://www.ulyssis.org/~p2/debjes/
>
> Could the quik.conf(5) man page also be modified to include
> documentation of
Ce jour Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Simon Vallet a dit:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:05:03 +0100
> Peter 'p2' De Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The quik.conf should be :
> >
> > image=/boot/vmlinux-2.6.9-powerpc
> > append="root=/dev/ram video=radeonfb:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > initrd=/boot/initrd.im
Ce jour Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Simon Vallet a dit:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:58:48 +0100
> Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc and initrd : I get stuck at
> VFS : Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block (1,0),
> which is what I experienced with previous quik versio
I have made base-config add the first user to plugdev, if that group
exists. So we only need a static plugdev group to be added in
base-passwd and this will be fixed. See
http://oskuro.net/blog/freesoftware/gnome-2.8-sarge-2004-12-03-18-19 for
some good reasoning about why this will become a FAQ if
Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> Yes, the installer creates the extended partition as small as possible.
> This is not a problem because the extended partition can always be
> resized provided it doesn't cover some primary partition.
>
> Most partitioning programs can resize the exten
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 283233 base-passwd
Bug#283233: base-config: Adding the first user to the "plugdev" group
Bug reassigned from package `base-config' to `base-passwd'.
> retitle 283233 add a st
Ce jour Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Christian Leimer a dit:
> Hi!
>
> Can someone please post a sample quik.conf?
>
> Do you use the ramdisk option or the append string one, any other settings?
>
> I have an Umax S900 and it does not work here.
> Says something about can not find the root device.
>
> I
Hi all,
I've been trying to get my system installed with the latest
sarge-netinst image using a USB flashdisk.
I have a supermicro system containing a marvell 4-port SATA controller,
I received the driver source from supermicro compiled it for 2.6.8-1-386
and put the resulting module on the USB
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
Sarge i386 RC2
Downloaded the 2004/12/01
on http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/cd-images/debian-weekly/i386/sarge-i386-1.iso
uname -a:
Date: 2004/12/02
Method: install from cd-rom
Machine: Acer Aspire 1300
Processor: Athlon
Memory: 256MB
Root Device: I
Your message dated Fri, 3 Dec 2004 19:23:57 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#283793: debian-installer: quik is still installed and
trying to do unwanted things on my harddisk which my break.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:39:49PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > That said, if we had done the change in august, then we would not have this
> > problem anymore now, so the whole discussion comes down to if we will
> > release
> > this year yet (highly unlikely), or 6 or more on
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
uname -a:
Date: <2004-12-03 16:00>
Method:
Machine:
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2x)
Memory: 1GB RAM
Root Device:
Root Size/partition table:
indeb005:~# fdisk -l /dev/cciss/c0d0
Disk /dev/cciss/c0d0: 72.8 GB, 72826629120
Please don't file RC bug reports about the WEB SITE on the
debian-installer pseudo package. We have a pasudo-package for the web
site, and the d=-i psudo package is abused enough as it is, and huge
time sink for me to reassign all the crap that is assigned here to the
correct package.
Anton Zinovi
- Forwarded message from Mike Müller - MySign AG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Mike Müller - MySign AG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 12:07:34 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: megaraid2 issue debian sarge
Hi Joey
I read the workaround to install debian sarge on
a dell 2850 o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 284082 www.debian.org
Bug#284082: Incomplete entry in the errata of rc2
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `www.debian.org'.
>
End of message, stopping process
Sven Luther wrote:
> That said, if we had done the change in august, then we would not have this
> problem anymore now, so the whole discussion comes down to if we will release
> this year yet (highly unlikely), or 6 or more onth from now.
I'm sorry, but I regard that attitude as such complete bul
reassign 284058 os-prober
retitle 284058 Did not detect a Mac OS/X install
thanks
> Installer does not add existing MAC OS X installation to yaboot. On
> intels grub is able to add existing Windows to its config, it would be
> nice for yaboot to also have such option.
As far as I can see, os-pro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 284058 os-prober
Bug#284058: Package: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `os-prober'.
> retitle 284058 Did not detect a Mac OS/X install
Bug#284058: Package: installation-reports
Changed Bug title.
> th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Peter 'p2' De Schrijver has made some new updates to the quik - you can get it
(.deb and source) at the http://www.ulyssis.org/~p2/debjes/
changes include:
- manpage tells about initrd
- compiles with gcc3
- sprintf bug fixed
- ANS raid supp
Your message dated Fri, 3 Dec 2004 18:07:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#276482: installer creates too small extended partition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Fri, 3 Dec 2004 18:13:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#279318: debian-installer: minor partition problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Thanks for your installation report.
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:58:31PM -0700, Charles Lear wrote:
>
>Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/hda1 * 14857390138217 HPFS/NTFS
> /dev/hda26690996426306437+ 5 Ex
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 you wrote:
>
> * I miss the exact partition sizes that cfdisk gives me. The new one says
> things like 1.9GB, whereas cfdisk says e.g. 5996.23MB.
This is a good wishlist - give the user the chance to change the format
of the screen and in particular the precision and measu
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > rc2 businesscard install, automated via preseed/url file. On my initial
> > attempt I booted with:
> > 0 languagechooser/language-name=English preseed/url=http://
> > debconf/priority=critical
>
>
> That one may be tricky...as I'm doing nearly
Your message dated Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:04:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273867: Sarge partman unable to reuse Woody swap partition
successfully
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 07:38:19AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> The attached screen captures show the main partman screen and the partition
> aditiing screen during an Arabic install. As you may see, the display is
> somewhat broken. For instance the partition size and the unit are not clos
Hi!
Thanks about your installation report. You sent it on 25 Sep 2004:
http://bugs.debian.org/273343
You wrote:
> I have two SCSI hard drives of 2.2GB each. The plan was as follows:
> sda1 50MB /boot
> sda2 200MB swap
> sda4 1.9GB RAID0 storage \
> sdb1 250MB swap > / (root)
> sdb2
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:51:13PM -, Leigh Brown wrote:
> Sven Luther said:
> > On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:10:31PM -, Leigh Brown wrote:
> >> Sven Luther said:
> >> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:25:46PM -, Leigh Brown wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> >> You can't boot from the CD's because they h
Package: debian-installer
Severity: critical
Merit for the severity: may cause serious data loss.
The current text in the errata is:
* LVM failure on Sparc32 (at least). If you want to create LVM volume
groups, the physical volumes must not reside at the beginning of the
disk, or else acti
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 18-Nov-2004 16:28
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-powerpc/rc2/images/powerpc/netboot/vmlinuz-prep.initrd
uname -a: Linux powerstack 2.6.8-powerpc #1 Sun Oct 3 13:22:21 CEST 2004
pc unknown
Date: 1-Dec-2004 19:00
Met
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:34:58PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 02 December 2004 14:39, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > How I can determine which version of partman was in rc1, beta4, etc.?
>
> One way would be to download the netinst CD and see what version is
> in /pool.
>
> If that's a pro
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:43:35PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 02 December 2004 15:28, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > Notice that hda7 and hda8 start before the end of hda6. This partition
> > table is broken (some partitioning tools are making such partition
> > tables) and in order to be sa
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso (debian-installer
rc2)
uname -a: 2.6.8-powerpc #1 Sun Oct 3 13:22:21 CEST 2004 ppc GNU/Linux
Date: December 2nd, 2004
Method: cd
Machine: iBook G4
Processor: PowerPC G4 (7447A, altivec supported, cl
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 06:34:55AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > That said, if we had done the change in august, then we would not have this
> > problem anymore now, so the whole discussion comes down to if we will
> > release
> > this year yet (highly unlikely), or 6 or more onth from no
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:31:43AM -0500, martin yazdzik wrote:
> Dear Friends,
>
> THe question I would like to have had answered, to wit, is the dual boot
> disk geometry problem solved, has been. Thanks.
>
> For the record, when using 2.6 to boot the cd, one sees that no matter
> what, when
55 matches
Mail list logo
