Hi: I am having a problem getting to 2.6 with boot and root on raid 1
(and the rest of the system on lvm2). I have tried making initrd's with
various options, etc etc. IT seems that my hardware is getting detected
during the boot, but then all of a sudden comes: "md: md1 stopping".
What's going
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-5-32-di_0.3_hppa.udeb standard debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for the Linux kernel.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-5-64-di_0.3_hppa.udeb standard debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for the
linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_0.3_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_0.3.dsc
linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_0.3.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.8-5-32-di_0.3_hppa.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.8-5-32-di_0.3_hppa.udeb
ppp-modules-2.6.8-5-32-di_0.3_hppa.udeb
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: <09/november/04
uname -a:
Date: <10/011/04>
Method:
Machine:
Processor: Celeron
Memory: 128M
Root Device:
Root Size/partition table: <
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
#
/dev/hda1 / ext
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 11:02:13AM +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> >This could have been due to the broken 2.4.27 kernel images that the
> >netinst was built upon.
> >
> >Try again in a few days when the new udebs have been built against.
>
> Okay, if I get a chance to get to the mach
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Not four160, roughly...:-)
>
> D-I is translated to 40 languages so any change needing more
> translations is currently unlikely as we are too close to a
> release. You can't imagine the energy we need to spend for syncing 40
> languages...:-)
The other problem with
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://home.tiscali.nl/isildur/d-i/log/en.log
===
If you would prefer this
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:35:02 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Sorry, this was fixed but I forgot to say so
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 280519 floppy-retriever
Bug#280519: Boot-floppy install fails to see net driver disk in USB floppy drive
Warning: Unknown package 'floppy-retreiver'
Bug reassigned from packag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 280519 floppy-retreiver
Bug#280519: Boot-floppy install fails to see net driver disk in USB floppy drive
Warning: Unknown package 'floppy-retreiver'
Bug reassigned from packag
Rob Sims wrote:
> I used the i386 floppy images to install to a Sony PCG-C1X which has no
> CD-ROM or floppy disk controller. Booting was done via a USB floppy
> drive. Boot followed by root disks (in expert mode) worked until I was
> prompted for a driver disk. The system failed to see the n
Package: debian-installer
Version: pre-rc2
I used the i386 floppy images to install to a Sony PCG-C1X which has no
CD-ROM or floppy disk controller. Booting was done via a USB floppy
drive. Boot followed by root disks (in expert mode) worked until I was
prompted for a driver disk. The system
On Nov 9, 2004, at 3:45 AM, Wade Berrier wrote:
One last thing I'm going to try is to replace the cmos battery. When I
boot into the woody install, the time is set to 1956. I'll set it, and
even still, the next reboot is 1956. I friend at work tipped me on
this
one. Maybe this will make it so
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 11:43:13PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thanks!
> Great range of tests. Nice that you also tested serial installs.
>
> AFAICT all tests lead to the expected results :-)
> I've added some comments for some of the tests.
>
>
Accepted:
fat-modules-2.6.8-amiga-di_0.65_m68k.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6/fat-modules-2.6.8-amiga-di_0.65_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.6.8-atari-di_0.65_m68k.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6/fat-modules-2.6.8-atari-di_0.65_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.6.8-bvme6000-di_0.65
hi all,
since yesterday i know i'm on the wrong list subscribed, tried lalady three
times to unsubscribe, also contacted somebody of listadmin but still on
this list.
i want to get of this list, can somebody fix this please?
greetings, Guido
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks!
Great range of tests. Nice that you also tested serial installs.
AFAICT all tests lead to the expected results :-)
I've added some comments for some of the tests.
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 18:57, Joey Hess wrote:
> Results of my testing:
>
I dont't know if this can help: (sorry I didn't read all the tread...)
I installed sarge with the current (8 november) sarge installer. I had to boot
with expert26, open a shell, modprobe ata_piix, modprobe libata. The the two
maxtor 6Y080M0 where detected.
My hardware:
asus P5GD1
two maxtor 6Y0
also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.1939 +0100]:
> >The only PPP module I see there is ppp-modules. And it has no
> >noticeable effect.
> Yes, I'm really talking about ppp-udeb.
So I guess it's not included in the netinst image (yet).
--
Please do not send copies of list mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> No, you are understanding this wrongly. He's talking about the ppp _udeb_.
>> That means 1st stage. This is the optional d-i module that can be selected
>> for installation during 'load installer components'.
>The only PPP module I see there is ppp-modules. And it has
Your message dated Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:02:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#27: fixed in discover1-data 1.2004.11.09
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:02:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#277655: fixed in discover1-data 1.2004.11.09
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:02:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255705: fixed in discover1-data 1.2004.11.09
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:02:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#267302: fixed in discover1-data 1.2004.11.09
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 November 2004 00:34, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > +# mount proc since arcboot needs it to decide between IP22 and IP32
> > +mount -t proc none /target/proc || true
>
> Wouldn't it be cleaner to test first if /target/proc was already mounted
> (with 'mount | grep -q
Accepted:
discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.11.09_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.11.09_all.udeb
discover1-data_1.2004.11.09.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1-data_1.2004.11.09.dsc
discover1-data_1.2004.11.09.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1
Your message dated Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:02:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278203: fixed in discover1-data 1.2004.11.09
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:02:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#276379: fixed in discover1-data 1.2004.11.09
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:02:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278203: fixed in discover1-data 1.2004.11.09
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:02:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278841: fixed in discover1-data 1.2004.11.09
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
discover1-data_1.2004.11.09_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1-data_1.2004.11.09.dsc
discover1-data_1.2004.11.09.tar.gz
discover1-data_1.2004.11.09_all.deb
discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.11.09_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Frans Pop wrote:
> > Found usbkbd kdb: 0x4a2:0x11
> ^^
> Hmmm.
> - From your /proc/bus/usb/devices I would expect this to read 'usbhid'.
Checked and it says usbkbd.
> I've committed the changes to svn after testing as far as I can, so please
> test this new version again.
Results of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 277322 discover1
Bug#277322: discover1-data: usb-uhci (kernel 2.4) is uhci-hcd in kernel 2.6
Bug reassigned from package `discover1-data' to `discover1'.
>
End of message, st
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: pre-rc2, 5/11/2004
http://cdimage.debian.org/
pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/pre-rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: 2.4.27-1-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Sep 3 06:34:36 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 5/11/2004
Method: CD-ROM boot of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 04:36, Joey Hess wrote:
> I tried this patch on my ia64, with a usb keyboard, and it does
> something very weird. In expert mode the list of keyboard types, which
> without this patch is "USB keyboard", changes to "e=4384 --
On Sun, 07 Nov 2004, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 07:21:01PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
> > Root Device: SATA
> > Output of lspci and lspci -n:
>
> > Base System Installation Checklist:
> > [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
> >
> > In
also sprach Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.1239 +0100]:
> No, you are understanding this wrongly. He's talking about the ppp _udeb_.
> That means 1st stage. This is the optional d-i module that can be selected
> for installation during 'load installer components'.
The only PPP module I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 12:07, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.1121 +0100]:
> > You install ppp-udeb and it will ask you username and password. Or at
> > least this is what I have been told it will
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 00:34, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> +# mount proc since arcboot needs it to decide between IP22 and IP32
> +mount -t proc none /target/proc || true
Wouldn't it be cleaner to test first if /target/proc was already mounted
(with 'mount | grep -q "on /target/proc"')?
> apt-
Tommy Trussell wrote:
< skipped >
I do not know PC hardware at all -- this drive that I'm trying to install the
root partition onto is on the same IDE cable as the CD-ROM drive. Could that be
a problem? I noticed the COMPAQ BIOS has three different timing settings for
handling the CD-ROM drive but
also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.1121 +0100]:
> You install ppp-udeb and it will ask you username and password. Or at
> least this is what I have been told it will do by some d-i person.
yes, in base-config, and only if you did not configure *any* network
card.
--
Please
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.08.0946 +0100]:
>> > Well we would like to support it eventually, it's a matter of getting a
>> > frontend written and integrating it with the ret of the installer
>> > though.
>> There /is/ a configuration frontend. W
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 01:45:35AM -0700, Wade Berrier wrote:
> Thanks for all the feedback I've gotten from y'all.
>
> Here's a quick log about my situation:
>
> First, started out as I installed woody from the boot-floppy-hfs.img,
> install went ok. On reboot, I get claim failed.
>
> I've tri
Thanks for all the feedback I've gotten from y'all.
Here's a quick log about my situation:
First, started out as I installed woody from the boot-floppy-hfs.img,
install went ok. On reboot, I get claim failed.
I've tried all the settings from the quik quirks page without any
success. (http://www
44 matches
Mail list logo
