Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:35:02 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Sorry, this was fixed but I forgot to say so
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2004 06:51:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 10 23:51:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from obitoo.bu.net.au (smtp.bu.net.au) [203.194.23.5]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C61j2-0007xl-00; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:51:08 -0700
Received: from localhost (obitoo [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.bu.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479E92F004C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:51:03 +1000 (EST)
Received: from smtp.bu.net.au ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (obitoo [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 32436-05 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:51:03 +1000 (EST)
Received: from keitarou (unknown [IPv6:2001:388:f000::2d])
by smtp.bu.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB34A2F0035
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:51:01 +1000 (EST)
Received: from localhost (keitarou [127.0.0.1])
by keitarou (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF66425EE95
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:51:03 +1000 (EST)
Received: from keitarou ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (keitarou [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 17976-03 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:51:01 +1000 (EST)
Received: by keitarou (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 965D425F063; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:51:01 +1000 (EST)
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:51:01 +1000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: debian-installer: Installation issue with "Installing Base System" and
mdadm
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Hampson)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at
queanbeyan.bubblesworth.net
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at bu.net.au
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Doing an installation using a daily netboot image from last week, using
a kernel2.6 with /boot on raid1 and / et al on lvm2 on another raid1, I
hit a problem with "Installing the Base System".
It would get to 85% (Creating Device Nodes) and then fail. As far as i
could glean from the logs, the install was failing trying to unmount
/target/proc, as /target/sbin/mdadm was running. This occured even with
debconf priority set to low; "Installing the Base System" never showed
me mdadm's debconf question about starting the md monitor daemon,
although it did install mdadm for me. ^_^
I got around this by running debootstrap et. al. by hand, following the
directions (loosely) in Appendix C.3. I had to muck around with
/target/etc/mtab as it only showed the root partition mounted, not any
of the other partitions mounted under /target. The fstab partman created
was fine though. ^_^
Also, once I'd done debootstrap, debian-installer refused to let me skip
"Installing the Base System" so I also had to do the bootloader by hand.
And I also didn't get the installation report template file. >_<
Apart from this, and having to pvcreate and vgcreate by hand during
partman, the installation seems to have worked well. (I didn't test
if manual vgcreate was neccessary or not though.)
Also, due to the 2.6.8 transition, I had to select unstable for my
mirror, get through to right before "Installing the Base System" and
then go back and reselect testing as my distribution. That worked fine.
It was suggested on IRC to pass mirror/suite=3Dunstable as a boot
parameter, but that overrides debian-install repeatedly, not just
preseeds, so with that parameter it wanted to install unstable, not
testing.
As such, this report might reference changes in unstable d-i that
isn't in testing d-i. The mdadm problem showed up trying to install
both unstable and testing, which doesn't surprise me since they're
the same version.
--=20
-----------------------------------------------------------
Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE
7th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU
The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"No survivors? Then where do the stories come from I wonder?"
-- Capt. Jack Sparrow, "Pirates of the Caribbean"
This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial
use, duplication and distribution.
-----------------------------------------------------------
--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBQqBVexDuohKLFuARAvSNAJ98GDknY1gHmldaMAPW/2IPKNfT5ACfVsSb
hHsNk2yg2czOs/fpfkbHDF4=
=zs4V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 271102-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2004 23:35:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 09 15:35:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from obitoo.bu.net.au (smtp.bu.net.au) [203.194.23.5]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CRfW0-0003Dv-00; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 15:35:08 -0800
Received: from localhost (obitoo [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.bu.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112512F05BA
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:35:04 +1100 (EST)
Received: from smtp.bu.net.au ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (obitoo [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 28581-03-9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:35:03 +1100 (EST)
Received: from keitarou (unknown [IPv6:2001:388:f000::2d])
by smtp.bu.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D7E2F0041
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:35:03 +1100 (EST)
Received: from localhost (keitarou [127.0.0.1])
by keitarou (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C20425F188
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:35:02 +1100 (EST)
Received: from keitarou ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (keitarou [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 19616-04 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:35:02 +1100 (EST)
Received: by keitarou (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 247B025F1F8; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:35:02 +1100 (EST)
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:35:02 +1100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sorry, this was fixed but I forgot to say so
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Hampson)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at
queanbeyan.bubblesworth.net
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at bu.net.au
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The patch in 264451 does indeed fix the problem I was having.
--=20
Paul "TBBle" Hampson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU
Shorter .sig for a more eco-friendly paperless office.
--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBkVQmexDuohKLFuARAjqpAJsEtoqYpr7JLwN0BW4ULTisDltdZwCdFiaH
LHSS7hGgZxC0f1dpV1CFid8=
=/tcO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
