Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 31-Jan-2004 03:14
http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/images/2004-01-31/
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 unknown
Date: Jan 31, 2004 21:00 PST
Method: bootfloppy-image.img
If network install, f
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:43:29 -0500, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
7. graphical boot screen
We would like to drag Debian kicking and screaming into the .. er,
late 90's by giving its installer a fancy graphical boot screen. We
have two candidates, but would be glad to see somethin
David - I solved my problem. I've discovered the last piece of the
puzzle to fix this for my wireless nic. the NetGear MA401 is NOT in the
/etc/pcmcia/config-2.4 file.
I was comparing Knoppix files to sarge and noticed that knoppix had an
entry for my card and sarge didn't:
card "Netgear MA401R
t
image from http://people.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/netinst/powerpc/20040131/
Bye,
Giuseppe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just tried both CD images (testing and sid) dated 2004/01/31 on a
powerbook g4, radeon, 15".
Basically, the testing version still show some problem in the italian
translation, that aren't present in the sid image. (See #228178 and
#228347)
Many problem are present on both images:
1. the italian
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 06:22:49PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Isn't the usual problem with wireless that the drivers for most cards must
> > be built from source because they aren't in the standard kernel? Are we
> > going to try to provide binary modules?
>
> Between or
Joey Hess wrote:
> I'm considering changing grub-installer/bootdev to have the following
> description.
>
> Now it is time to make the newly installed Debian system bootable, by
> installing the GRUB bootloader on a bootable device. The usual way to do
> this is to install GRUB on the MBR of
Accepted:
usb-discover_0.07.dsc
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.07.dsc
usb-discover_0.07.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.07.tar.gz
usb-discover_0.07_all.udeb
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.07_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for yo
I just tried again with the latest image and the problem are still
there:
1. cdrom isn't recognized
2. the installer prompts about configuring it manually, but if you
select 'no' the installer loop on the same question.
Bye,
Giuseppe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Yup - I can modprobe them just fine. cardmgr will not put them there
automagically:
# lsmod
Module Size Used byNot tainted
orinoco_cs 4628 0 (unused)
orinoco35636 0 [orinoco_cs]
hermes 5988 0 [orinoco_cs orinoco]
ds
usb-discover_0.07_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
usb-discover_0.07.dsc
usb-discover_0.07.tar.gz
usb-discover_0.07_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 04:12:53PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > * Denis Barbier
> > - Steal code from debconf to go back over skipped questions.
> > Closes: #225861, #229719
> >
> > I think that this change broke cdebconf subtly.
> [...]
>
> There was indeed a bu
I have a quite curious problem to solve.
i have a computer overseaswith hd (no os) and floppy drive no cdrom . it
is
connected to a network . i want to install linux on it. but i only have
an idiot in that location that can put a floppy in the drive and power
it up. if anyone has a suggestion.on ho
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 09:20:20PM +0100, Erich Waelde wrote:
> IMHO the MBR is a ``sacred site''. I strongly agree with your opinion not
> to touch it unless explicitly permitted. I would like to see this fixed,
> too. I wouldn't even know how to fix a broken windows MBR.
If you have a floppy dri
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:54:46 -0500
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Glenn McGrath wrote:
> > Is the only reason we need a writable filesystem so that the install
> > reoprt can be stored there ? Is that a permanent feature ?
>
> There are dozens of places where the installer writes to its
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-31 13:02]:
> > Now it is time to make the newly installed Debian system bootable, by
> > installing the GRUB bootloader on a bootable device. The usual way to do
> > this is to install GRUB on the MBR of your first hard drive.
Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Hi all,
> I just tried to commit a big patch for italian translations and got this
> error. I think this is a problem in the Alioth server. Could anyone
> explain/fix it?
All I see is lock contention, which does not seem to be stale locks as
you eventually got the lock, and
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 04:12:53PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> * Denis Barbier
> - Steal code from debconf to go back over skipped questions.
> Closes: #225861, #229719
>
> I think that this change broke cdebconf subtly.
[...]
There was indeed a bug in cdebconf, a fix has just been comm
Glenn McGrath wrote:
> What are the ideas ?
>
> I may be interested in working on them...
The best ideas I've seen are:
- debix (http://alioth.debian.org/projects/debix)
- a udeb that turns on swap earlier, using a spare partition or drive,
before the whole installer is loaded and before pa
Hi all,
I just tried to commit a big patch for italian translations and got this
error. I think this is a problem in the Alioth server. Could anyone
explain/fix it?
[...]
cvs diff: [00:35:55] waiting for eppesuig's lock in
/cvsroot/d-i/debian-installer/tools/mipsel/delo-installer/debian/po
Checkin
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-31 13:02]:
> Now it is time to make the newly installed Debian system bootable, by
> installing the GRUB bootloader on a bootable device. The usual way to do
> this is to install GRUB on the MBR of your first hard drive.
Perhaps explain what MBR is.
-
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Isn't the usual problem with wireless that the drivers for most cards must
> be built from source because they aren't in the standard kernel? Are we
> going to try to provide binary modules?
Between orinoco and orinoco_pci and a few others, the kernel actually
has reasonab
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:43:29 -0500
> 4. low memory support
>
>d-i barely supports installations on systems with 32 mb of memory.
>It's unlilkely to ever support lesser systems unless someone steps
>up to work on it. We have some ideas, that should work, but no
>time.
What are the
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 01:43:29PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> - security fixed, 2.4.24 kernel (with SATA support)
> (done for stock i386 (but not SATA, probably?))
I actually installed woody (bf24) onto a system with only SATA disks a few
days ago. It worked, but things were a little
Accepted:
archdetect_0.65_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.65_i386.udeb
ddetect_0.65.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.65.dsc
ddetect_0.65.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.65.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.65_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.65_all.udeb
hw-detect-full
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> In short: Installation is great, but SW-management
> so difficult that I don't even know where to begin.
Well, I felt lost until I installed "aptitude". This gave me the
view on sw packages I liked and understood. You can disable
"install recommended / suggested p
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:58:17PM -0500, Kevin Remisoski wrote:
> Having a little trouble installing using the new installer. I
> get to the kernel install, and can't get any further than that.
> I've tried selecting a few different kernels to no avail. Was
> hoping someone might have some insig
* Denis Barbier
- Steal code from debconf to go back over skipped questions.
Closes: #225861, #229719
I think that this change broke cdebconf subtly. I tested an image with
the cvs cdebconf on it. In netcfg, it failed to get a dhcp lease, and I
told it to back up at the y/n retry quest
ddetect_0.65_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_0.65.dsc
ddetect_0.65.tar.gz
hw-detect_0.65_all.udeb
ethdetect_0.65_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.65_all.udeb
archdetect_0.65_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 10:11:29PM -0500, John Lavin wrote:
> here are the modules loaded under knoppix
> when the card works:
> pcmcia_core
> yenta_socket
> orinoco
> orinoco_cs
What happens when you modprobe all of these modules? Are they all
present?
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Debian-installer-version:
11 Jan 2004
$ md5sum sarge-i386-netinst.iso
a32f7a32be8adff64514ec4e46a196e7 sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Install Date:
18 Jan 2004
=
Hello,
Marc Herbert writes:
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > Quoting Marc Herbert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > > Generally speaking, I find the new design of the installer very nice:
> > > I like the idea of being able to go back and forth between "clever"
> > > and "m
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2004-01-31T19:34+
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/20040130/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.24-1-386 #1
Tue Jan 6 19:18:04 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-01-31T19:41+
Metho
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 07:19:15PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 09:40:10AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 02:20:30PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > 2) umount was unable to unmount /target/proc. I thought this was a bug
> > > and is already fixed, i
Good Writing you again.
I am indeed very sad to inform you that I am having problem with my project e-mail
address that I wrote you from in the past; It has refused to open.
Please send your response to my private e-mail address: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
I do hope you will bear with me on this unfo
Here goes base-config
base-config/debian/po/pt.po
msgfmt -o /dev/null --statistics pt.po
115 translated messages.
"fighting the fuzzys"
--
Miguel Figueiredo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.DebianPT.org
http://www.fabricadasideias.com
#
#Translators, if you a
Here goes debian-installer/tools/ddetect/debian/po/pt.po please commit.
msgfmt -o /dev/null --statistics pt.po
24 translated messages.
--
Miguel Figueiredo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.DebianPT.org
http://www.fabricadasideias.com
#
#Translators, if you are
The battle against fuzzys goes on...
please commit debian-installer/partman/partman/pt.po
msgfmt -o /dev/null --statistics pt.po
24 translated messages.
--
Miguel Figueiredo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.DebianPT.org
http://www.fabricadasideias.com
#
#Trans
debian-installer/partman/partman-ext3/debian/po/pt.po
translated by Nuno SÃnica.
please commit.
msgfmt -o /dev/null --statistics pt.po
21 translated messages.
--
Miguel Figueiredo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.DebianPT.org
http://www.fabricadasideias.com
# Portu
Here goes debian-installer\partman\partman-basicfilesystems\debian\po\pt.po
msgfmt -o /dev/null --statistics pt.po
36 translated messages.
please commit
--
Miguel Figueiredo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.DebianPT.org
http://www.fabricadasideias.com
# Portuguese
> > Just saw your IRC exchanges with joeyh about this. Can you indicate which
> > boot loader was involved?
>
> As if I had time to choose one! The default one of course: GRUB.
Thanks for the kind and polite answer and giving the precision we needed.
> By the way, it's kinda funny to provide two
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: January 31, 2004 (unstable)
uname -a: Linux zurg 2.4.24 #2 Sat Jan 24 09:23:56 CST 2004 i686 athlon
i386 GNU/Linux
Date: 10:27 cst us, January 31, 2004
Method:
Tried the unstable beta2 version of the new installer
to install
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 09:40:10AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 02:20:30PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > 2) umount was unable to unmount /target/proc. I thought this was a bug
> > and is already fixed, i wonder if this is the cause of the problem or
> > if it only comes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # d-i installation report in which the 2.4.22 kernel supports the
> # keyboard, but 2.4.24 does not
> reassign 230464 kernel-image-2.4.24-1-386
Bug#230464: IBM Thinkpad R40e: fail - no keyboard response with 2.4.24 kernel
Bug reassigned from package `in
Also note that on Jan 27th I added support to grub to let you back up
from the question to the main menu as a way of canceling the install.
That change has not yet reached the archive however.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I'm considering changing grub-installer/bootdev to have the following
description.
Now it is time to make the newly installed Debian system bootable, by
installing the GRUB bootloader on a bootable device. The usual way to do
this is to install GRUB on the MBR of your first hard drive.
.
N
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having a little trouble
installing using the new installer. I get to the kernel install, and can't
get any further than that. I've tried selecting a few different kernels to
no avail. Was hoping someone might have some insight on this
problem.
Kevin
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 10:22:00PM -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> (Also, the netinst disc doesn't include the 3c59x driver, which seems
> strange for a network install)
This is probably a mismatch between the kernel and module
versions. Please try again with a more recent image.
--
Matt Kra
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 02:20:30PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> 2) umount was unable to unmount /target/proc. I thought this was a bug
> and is already fixed, i wonder if this is the cause of the problem or
> if it only comes later when base-config is trying to reset itself for
> a new insta
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:32:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#228915: fixed in busybox-cvs 20040101-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:32:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#228248: fixed in busybox-cvs 20040101-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Accepted:
busybox-cvs-floppy-udeb_20040101-6_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-floppy-udeb_20040101-6_i386.udeb
busybox-cvs-static_20040101-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-static_20040101-6_i386.deb
busybox-cvs-udeb_20040101-6_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/busybox
busybox-cvs_20040101-6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
busybox-cvs_20040101-6.dsc
busybox-cvs_20040101-6.diff.gz
busybox-cvs-static_20040101-6_i386.deb
busybox-cvs_20040101-6_i386.deb
busybox-cvs-udeb_20040101-6_i386.udeb
busybox-cvs-floppy-udeb_200
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 03:32:42PM +0100, Marc Herbert wrote:
> What is also funny is that the installer stops and ask confirmation
> before rebooting. You know why? because at this time, there is the
> great danger of... rebooting from the CD! A very frightening situation
> indeed.
If you weren't
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:49:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Cleaning up installation reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 07:03:04AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
[snip]
> > > and /target/proc became not umountable, which is just weird because
> > > apt-install tries to umount it and fails (thus failing kernel-installer
> > > and
> > > {grub|lilo}-installer)
> >
> > This is bug 22912
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:45:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#227969: installation-reports: manual mirror selection causes a
loop
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
> INSTALL REPORT
>
> Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-23 01:42 sarge-i386-netinst.iso
>(105MB,beta1)
> uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003
>i686 GNU/Linux
> Date: 2003-12-25 22:20
>
> Machine: Medion Titanium 8080 XL
> Proce
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:07:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Installation reports cleanup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:56:03 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229347: install report on acer aspire 2000
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:53:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229423: Debian Installer Report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:37:03 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230458: installation-reports: Install failed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:31:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#226005: installation-reports: Installation report (2004-01-02):
many problems with french version of base config
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:27:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225989: installation-reports: Installation report (2003-01-02):
deboostrap error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Marc Herbert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Generally speaking, I find the new design of the installer very nice:
> > I like the idea of being able to go back and forth between "clever"
> > and "manual" modes. But please, just ask confirmation (j
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:07:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225011: debian-installer install report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Am Saturday 31 January 2004 03:54 schrieb Joey Hess:
> Simon Hürlimann wrote:
> > I just began doing my five:-)
>
> Please feel free to do more than 7. :-)
I did:-) Well, there's a reason: should do some work for the university...
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:53:07 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Installation reports cleanup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:43:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Cleaning up installation reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:32:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Report has been analysed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:31:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230279: Installer report for HP Omnibook 6000
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:29:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#226347: Install report, i386, success
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Quoting Marc Herbert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Generally speaking, I find the new design of the installer very nice:
> I like the idea of being able to go back and forth between "clever"
> and "manual" modes. But please, just ask confirmation (just provide
> a "back" button) before doing anything "cl
Quoting Ilia Kantsedikas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> All went OK, but install failed during package installation, reason:
> unsatisfied dependencies/failure to configure
> packages. Pkg list follows:
> -
> at
> mailx
> exim4
> -
> can't_remember_the_rest
Do you confirm that this happened when
Hello,
I have been battling with the powerpc kernel-installer since a few days,
and i don't manage to get it working correctly.
I also wonder how this thing is working for other powerpc kernels, or
even non-powerpc arches.
First a precision, i build debian-installer from the CVS HEAD branch,
use
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 230279 -1
Bug#230279: Installer report for HP Omnibook 6000
Bug 230279 cloned as bug 230511.
> reassign -1 partitioner
Bug#230511: Installer report for HP Omnibook 6000
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partitioner'.
> retit
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:57:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230444: FWD: BETA2: Install Report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:47:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#228944: INSTALL REPORT
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Package: debian-installer
Version: N/A; reported 2004-01-31
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
I tried yesterday's latest (thx joeyh) debian-installer images. After
circumventing a few (more or less) known bugs, I finally was very
upset to see that... the installation was f
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20040129 (2004-01-29)
uname -a: N/A, but the machine is i686(p4)
Date: 2004-01-30 19:00
Method: Installed by net. Booted off netinst bussiness card image.
Installed from debian.blueyonder.co.uk
(think so). Yes via HHTP proxy MS-IAS aka MS-Proxy.
Machine: N
Accepted:
busybox-cvs-floppy-udeb_20040101-5_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-floppy-udeb_20040101-5_i386.udeb
busybox-cvs-static_20040101-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-static_20040101-5_i386.deb
busybox-cvs-udeb_20040101-5_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/busybox
busybox-cvs_20040101-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
busybox-cvs_20040101-5.dsc
busybox-cvs_20040101-5.diff.gz
busybox-cvs-static_20040101-5_i386.deb
busybox-cvs_20040101-5_i386.deb
busybox-cvs-udeb_20040101-5_i386.udeb
busybox-cvs-floppy-udeb_200
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:02:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229271: no lilo go back, too much crap installed, 75% wait,
/tmp-Xhack
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 09:55:02 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230451: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Quoting Miguel Figueiredo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Here goes tasksel-1.43/tasks/po/pt.po please commit.
>
>
> msgfmt -o /dev/null --statistics pt.po
> 80 translated messages.
Commited. My first svn commit ever, by the way. Champagne
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Quoting Miguel Figueiredo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Here goes tasksel-1.43/po/pt.po please commit.
>
> msgfmt -o /dev/null --statistics pt.po
> 39 translated messages.
Guess what ? You forgot it...:-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Quoting Jeremie Koenig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Add a new entry to language chooser reading something like "Choose this
> to proceed without internationalisation" (LANG=C). When it is chosen,
> make country-chooser disappair from the menu.
H, countrychooser is meant for getting a default not on
Quoting Simon Hürlimann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
(about keyboard choosing menus)
> > These terms are translatable.
> Where are the files to translate? If german translation isn't there yet, I'll
> do it.
They are part of the console-data package.
According http://people.debian.org/~barbier/intl/l1
89 matches
Mail list logo
