Valery Febvre wrote:
>
> I have tested debian-installer last 5 days and I have severals
> questions:
>
> 2) Even if debian-installer downloads libraries (.udeb) at the begining
> of the compilation, it doesn't use them and uses system's librairies
> instead (with mklibs.sh)! Why?
> I had to inst
I've updated these patches. Please use this version instead
of the original.
This version fixes some problems in the patches I originally
sent, but they lack build-testing. Thanks to Daniel
Jacobowitz for pointing out most of these problems. (I'm
sure there are more.)
Changelog entries:
powe
ReiserFS works just fine on big endian systems in 2.2. The patch
for 2.4 is also available, from what I've heard. Because the kernel
interfaces were/are changing so rapidly in 2.4, rfs has lagged
behind a bit in the later stages of 2.3 because they don't like
redoing their work every time some k
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 01:36:52AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hm. It seems that you are right. I noticed the 2.2.18 per se was
> missing, ran 'grep-available' to check for other packages, and only
> 2.2.17 came up, I don't know why. Going through the lists apt
> downloaded by hand reveal
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 01:19:08AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I assume you're talking woody here? I've been working on potato boot
> floppies for the past week steadily and not had time to look at the
> woody set.
Yes.
> > - config: Changed default powerpc kernel version to 2.2.17.
>
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 08:50:03PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 02:04:53PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > Under what conditions does this happen?
>
> AFAIK (based on ramblings from benh on #mklinux) it seems to affect
> the recent iMac keyboards. for some reason
I assume you're talking woody here? I've been working on potato boot
floppies for the past week steadily and not had time to look at the
woody set.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 01:12:55AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I got a build that ran all the way up to release.sh before failing
> to install
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 01:15:37AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Braino there -- 'pmac' should be 'powerpc' in powermac.rules. Sorry.
^^^
'powerpc.rules'. argh.
~~
--
James Deikun, Techie(tm), CSI Multimedia
The opinions expressed
Braino there -- 'pmac' should be 'powerpc' in powermac.rules. Sorry.
--
James Deikun, Techie(tm), CSI Multimedia
The opinions expressed &c.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I got a build that ran all the way up to release.sh before failing
to install some documentation. Here are the relevant patches. I'm
not too sure about the second one, because I don't understand what
'$system' is supposed to be for (it's currently always passed in as
null from the higher-level s
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 08:41:58PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> keep in mind that reiserfs is totally broken on big endian
> archetectures (m68k, sparc, powerpc) right now. there is work being
> done and its making progress but none of it is merged upstream yet.
Yeah, hopefully it's on par by th
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 02:04:53PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> Under what conditions does this happen?
AFAIK (based on ramblings from benh on #mklinux) it seems to affect
the recent iMac keyboards. for some reason the kernel decides that
the arrow key is sysrq so stops functioning as an
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 08:20:12PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Well, absolutely not the default, but it's a possible option. If we
> go with grub, I think that doesn't get along with ReiserFS. Is it
> necessary to use kernel 2.4.x if you want ReiserFS?
keep in mind that reiserfs is totally
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 93912 + fixed
Bug#93912: Link error in dbootstrap setup of vmlinuz
Tags added: fixed
> close 93912
Bug#93912: Link error in dbootstrap setup of vmlinuz
Bug closed, send any further explanations to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> merge 93912 68497
Bug#6849
tags 93912 + fixed
close 93912
merge 93912 68497
thanks
This bug has already been fixed in the Woody boot floppies.
Please see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=68497
for an earlier report of the same error.
Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: installation
Version: 2.2rel2 SPARC sun4cdm (Sparcstation 20)
Symptom: system reported it couldn't find /vmlinuz when trying to boot from
the hard disk for the first time
Analysis: the dbootstrap system incorrectly links /boot/vmlinuz ->
/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.18pre21 rather than the correct
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/dbootstrap
who:kraai
time: Fri Apr 13 18:35:58 PDT 2001
Log Message:
Fix help message description of Proxy Port.
Files:
changed:net-fetch.c
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 06:24:27PM -0700, Sam Powers wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 07:15:35PM -0600, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
> > > > > I was just wondering, will the next Debian release (2.3?) be based
> > > > > on kernel 2.4?
> > >
> > > It is not currently planned, for boot-floppies 2
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 07:15:35PM -0600, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
> > > > I was just wondering, will the next Debian release (2.3?) be based on
> > > > kernel 2.4?
> >
> > It is not currently planned, for boot-floppies 2.3.x anyhow, to move to the
> > 2.4 kernels.
>
> Really? If the rele
> > > I was just wondering, will the next Debian release (2.3?) be based on
> > > kernel 2.4?
>
> It is not currently planned, for boot-floppies 2.3.x anyhow, to move to the
> 2.4 kernels.
Really? If the release is not going to be until the summer, I would think it
to be really unwise to use K
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/dbootstrap
who:dwhedon
time: Fri Apr 13 17:39:33 PDT 2001
Log Message:
utils.c: remove progress_execlog(), not using it anymore.
extract_base.c: calling debootstrap in a more complicated way now to allow for
a better UI including status message
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:28:22PM -0700, Sam Powers wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 08:20:12PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > "Dwayne C. Litzenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > If so, will the installation program support reiserfs, a parted
> > > > frontend, will it support reiserfs a
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 08:20:12PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> "Dwayne C. Litzenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > If so, will the installation program support reiserfs, a parted
> > > frontend, will it support reiserfs as a default install method,
>
> Well, absolutely not the default, b
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:03:48AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Woah, uh, if we do that, does that mean we have to ship those split
> > images as part of boot-floppies? God, I hope not.
>
> Nah, I figure we just write a script that lets people gene
"Dwayne C. Litzenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 08:35:27PM -0600, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
> > I was just wondering, will the next Debian release (2.3?) be based on kernel
> > 2.4?
It is not currently planned, for boot-floppies 2.3.x anyhow, to move to
the 2.
Repository: boot-floppies
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 17:13:52 PDT 2001
Log Message:
start collecting a list of packages that need to be in testing but
aren't, so we can coorindate our bug filing on them
Files:
changed:todo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Repository: boot-floppies
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 17:13:09 PDT 2001
Log Message:
James Deikun patch: use libc version 2.2.2 for powerpc
Files:
changed:rootdisk.sh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
Applied, but again, it wasn't clean. Please include any patches as
attachements.
I'm happy to give you CVS write permissions for debian-boot CVS area
as well.
FYI, I'm doing an NMU of debootstrap to fix the problems you reported
(and ARM).
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshor
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/dbootstrap
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 17:05:58 PDT 2001
Log Message:
Stephen R. Marenka patch: disable mac/mac-de-latin1-nodeadkeys.kmap.gz
on PowerPC until console-data is fixed
Files:
changed:kbdconfig.c
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
Repository: boot-floppies
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 17:05:53 PDT 2001
Log Message:
Stephen R. Marenka patch: disable mac/mac-de-latin1-nodeadkeys.kmap.gz
on PowerPC until console-data is fixed
Files:
changed:keymaps.sh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I believe this was caused because console-data was in unstable, but not testing
> and I had unstable pinned so that I can only explicitly download from unstable
> (e.g., apt-get -d install console-data/unstable).
That's pretty damn cute. I think maybe we should be us
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Would it be possible to get a status update on woody/i18n/utf
boot-floppies once you have done that? Possily put in 'todo' ?
I assume we're going to have to switch to use the -utf8 versions of
slang/newt, use the new bf-utf package (is that available yet?), and
try to make sure all those message
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 08:35:27PM -0600, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
> I was just wondering, will the next Debian release (2.3?) be based on kernel
> 2.4? If so, will the installation program support reiserfs, a parted frontend, will
>it support reiserfs as a default install method, parted to
Repository: boot-floppies/debian
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 14:40:42 PDT 2001
Log Message:
pb's change
Files:
changed:Tag: potato changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 02:46:37PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just a quicky before I have to bail for family time.
>
> rootdisk.sh dies complaining that recode doesn't like the input. I searched far
> and wide and can't find a definition for $charset anywhere. So for giggles I
> defined it
Just a quicky before I have to bail for family time.
rootdisk.sh dies complaining that recode doesn't like the input. I searched far
and wide and can't find a definition for $charset anywhere. So for giggles I
defined it to be ISO-8559-1 (this is to recode the end-of-line for boot_message
which i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 79734 + fixed
Bug#79734: [i18n] /etc/fstab is in unicode
Tags added: fixed
> tag 82482 + fixed
Bug#82482: /boot/vmlinuz softlink misdirected
Bug#68497: potato sparc /etc/silo.conf irregularity
Tags added: fixed
> tag 85397 + fixed
Bug#85397: 2.2r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 64565 + fixed
Bug#64565: base unpack should have progress bar
Tags added: fixed
> tag 67510 + fixed
Bug#67510: nf_http_fetchfile couldn't resolve host name
Tags added: fixed
> tag 75018 + fixed
Bug#75018: [WOODY] please symlink base#_#.tgz
Tags a
Installing:
bf-sun4dm-pci_2.3.0_sparc.tar.gz byhand
bf-images-1.44_2.3.0_sparc.tar.gz byhand
boot-floppies_2.3.0.dsc
to pool/main/b/boot-floppies/boot-floppies_2.3.0.dsc
boot-floppies_2.3.0_all.deb
to pool/main/b/boot-floppies/boot-floppies_2.3.0_all.deb
bf-archive-install_2.3.0_sparc.sh byha
tag 79734 + fixed
tag 82482 + fixed
tag 85397 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 00:20:21 -0400
Source: boot-floppies
Binary: boot-floppi
Installing:
bf-common_2.3.1_i386.tar.gz byhand
boot-floppies_2.3.1_all.deb
to pool/main/b/boot-floppies/boot-floppies_2.3.1_all.deb
bf-doc_2.3.1_i386.tar.gz byhand
bf-images-1.20_2.3.1_i386.tar.gz byhand
boot-floppies_2.3.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/boot-floppies/boot-floppies_2.3.1.tar.gz
boot-f
tag 64565 + fixed
tag 67510 + fixed
tag 75018 + fixed
tag 77048 + fixed
tag 92907 + fixed
tag 93054 + fixed
tag 93069 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: S
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:21:42PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 01:15:23AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > it is possible NOW to have a fully working `make linux bootable from
> > > the hard disk' step on newworld powermac
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 10:56:06AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Dan, let me know when you have all the Potato source in good shape.
> At that point we can burn the new version, I can do a source upload
> and i386 binary version.
>
> I already have the hdg/hdh bug fix in CVS which I think make
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 03:07:01PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 04:32:27PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > is *anything* missing for 2.2r3 wrt. boot-floppies?
> >
> > Not sure I understand the question -- I guess not as
Repository: boot-floppies
who:pb
time: Fri Apr 13 11:03:56 PDT 2001
Log Message:
use 2.2.19 for potato on arm
Files:
changed:Tag: potato config
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 09:50:15AM -0700 wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 02:54:01AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> >
> [suggestion to add telnet/netcat to boot-floppies]
s/telnet\//
telnet is already there. see the attachment to:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot-0104/msg00400.html
for the conten
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 02:54:01AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
[suggestion to add telnet/netcat to boot-floppies]
>
> I guess I would really shelf this for now... or just take suggestions
> and leave them in todo for now.
busybox 0.51 (others also?) includes netcat and telnet. i guess its a
m
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 03:36:58PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maybe we can get ppc cleaned up!
Hope so!
> For the time being I just commented out mac-de-latin1-nodeadkeys.kmap.gz in
> keymaps.sh. I didn't see any good solution for what looked like a missing
> maintainer. (It doesn't look
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 04:51:16PM +0200, Thierry Laronde wrote:
> FWIW, on the 10th of april has been released a version of Busybox including
> a 22k vi. Perhaps, in the future, the end of the small editors wars ;)
:) but how close to a ``real'' vi is it?
/me goes to find out . . .
-john
--
Thank you Enrique. I'll check it.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on "Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:18:39 +0100",
with "Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support",
Enrique Zanardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have built newt packages with the utf8 patch. They are at
> http://people.debian.org/~e
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Interestingly, dbootstrap/kbdconfig.c already has this
>> commented out for PPC,
>> but not for m68k. Should I send a patch to comment it
>> out in keymaps.sh and for m68k?
> Sure. It should be in sync.
>> It also occurs in dbootstrap/langs/german.src, but I'm
>>
>You aren't really making yourself clear.
>What is the error you got?
>What is the diff between the standard apt.preferences and
>the one you are using.
In the interests of clarity
The error was as follows:
Package console-data has no available version, but exists in the database. This
FWIW, on the 10th of april has been released a version of Busybox including
a 22k vi. Perhaps, in the future, the end of the small editors wars ;)
--
Thierry LARONDE, Centre de Ressources Informatiques, Archamps - France
http://www.cri74.org
PingOO, serveur de com sur distribution GNU/Linux: htt
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:03:48AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Woah, uh, if we do that, does that mean we have to ship those split
> images as part of boot-floppies? God, I hope not.
Nah, I figure we just write a script that lets people generate them
from the mirrors or their CD. Hmmm. Or mayb
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 09:57:02AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Thierry Laronde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > FWIW, I, as a french native speaker, do not consider that Debian has to try
> > to put all the message catalogs for all the languages in floppies. It would
> > be enough to have flop
Repository: boot-floppies/debian
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 07:20:46 PDT 2001
Log Message:
changes from Stephen R. Marenka
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/libfdisk
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 07:15:59 PDT 2001
Log Message:
a hack for building using kernel 2.4 from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Files:
changed:partbl_msdos.c
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
I have tested debian-installer last 5 days and I have severals
questions:
1) Why do I need to put modutils-basic_2.4.1-2_i386.udeb in
build/localudebs/
( http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/debian-installer )
modutils-basic.udeb is in directory udebs/ (downloaded during make)
2) Even if debian-inst
Repository: boot-floppies
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 07:12:48 PDT 2001
Log Message:
enable an environment variable APT_PREFS or a local config file
preferences.apt for apt configuration; based on a patch from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Files:
changed:common.sh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Interestingly, dbootstrap/kbdconfig.c already has this commented out for PPC,
> but not for m68k. Should I send a patch to comment it out in keymaps.sh and for
> m68k?
Sure. It should be in sync.
> It also occurs in dbootstrap/langs/german.src, but I'm not really su
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
