Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2000 00:32:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 23 19:32:04 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from itaipu.nitnet.com.br [200.255.111.241]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 #2 (Debian))
id 12uP5d-0004nG-00; Tue, 23 May 2000 19:32:02 -0500
Received: (qmail 11236 invoked from network); 24 May 2000 00:29:06 -0000
Received: from salzburg.nitnet.com.br (HELO cesarb2.cesarb.personal) (200.255.111.229)
by itaipu.nitnet.com.br with SMTP; 24 May 2000 00:29:06 -0000
Received: from cesarb by cesarb2.cesarb.personal with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 12uOvN-0000Yy-00; Tue, 23 May 2000 21:21:25 -0300
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: base unpack should have progress bar
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.55
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.55
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 21:21:25 -0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.15-pre-joeyh; reported 2000-05-23
Severity: wishlist
Unpacking the base system on a 386SX25 is way too slow. It should have a
progress bar to give an idea of how long would it take.
I know it's hard; it's just a wishlist.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux cesarb2 2.2.14 #1 Wed May 10 17:20:51 BRT 2000 i586
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 64565-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Apr 2001 23:35:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 13 18:35:29 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from arroz.onshored.com [216.220.101.2] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14oD65-0006YA-00; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:35:26 -0500
Received: from arroz.fake (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by arroz.onshored.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9D3E993802; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
From: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 24
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you very much for your bug report. We believe the issue you
reported is solved as of boot-floppies 2.3.1. That is the woody
version of boot-floppies, which is available in the archive, or, some
SPARC and i386, at
<URL:http://people.debian.org/~aph/debian/dists/woody/main/>.
If you feel your bug is still outstanding, please let us know or
reopen your bug -- see <http://www.debian.org/Bugs/> for instructions
how to do that.
We are not longer working on Potato boot-floppies, except for critical
issues. If you feel that your bug hasn't been fixed as of
boot-floppies 2.2.22 (the latest Potato version), then you we need to
reopen your bug and put the 'potato' tag on it. Please be sparing --
the more we are distracted with Potato issues, the less effort we are
able to put into Woody boot-floppies.
Again, thanks for your report. Bug reports are a significant
contribution to Debian. We apologize that it probably took so long to
fix the issue you reported.
--
.....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
