On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 02:29:29PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 04:26:01PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:25:36AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > > Please remove the following m68k binary packages from unstable.
> > >
> > > Dis
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 04:26:01PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:25:36AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > Please remove the following m68k binary packages from unstable.
> >
> > Discussion about this happened here:
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2
tags 363424 moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:25:36AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Please remove the following m68k binary packages from unstable.
>
> Discussion about this happened here:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2006/04/msg00021.html
>
> xpilot-ng-client-x11_1:4.7.2-
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:16:50PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:36:49PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > It looks like the concensus is that right now there's no real point
> > in building openal and friends on m68k.
> >
> > I've marked openal not-for-us and I'll
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#362590: FTBFS on m68k
Mail-Followup-To: Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Debian GNU/Linux m68k ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It looks like the concensus is that right now there's no real point
in building openal and friends on m68k.
I've mar
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:36:49PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> It looks like the concensus is that right now there's no real point
> in building openal and friends on m68k.
>
> I've marked openal not-for-us and I'll include it in an update to p-a-s
> soon.
>
> You'll need to request to hav
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 01:05:54PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> dropping the bugreport from this CC.
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:50:15PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > > > I believe 3D on m68k is rather useless nowadays, but if someone
> > > > knows better than me, please shout now! :-
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:16:50PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Perhaps too much work for having less packages to look after on m68k.
> (which I think would help the port, however).
Keeping up isn't really our problem. The numerous bugs in gcc is
the biggest problem.
--
Stephen R. Marenka
It looks like the concensus is that right now there's no real point
in building openal and friends on m68k.
I've marked openal not-for-us and I'll include it in an update to p-a-s
soon.
You'll need to request to have the old m68k binaries removed.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If
dropping the bugreport from this CC.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:50:15PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > > I believe 3D on m68k is rather useless nowadays, but if someone
> > > knows better than me, please shout now! :-)
> > Indeed, until someone gets the Mediator going, and we can start
> > us
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:32:07AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > > I'd like to hear if somebody knows about multi-channel soundscards, which
> > > would/could work.
> > I'm not sure that's really all that important? I've never used any such
> > card, but OpenAL has been working nicely for me
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 10:50:02AM +0100, Christian Brandt wrote:
> I would prefer a patch to the m68k-OSS-legacy-drivers inside the
> kernel to "accept" 16Bit-audio and "downmixing" it to the 8Bit because
> 8Bit-audio tends to cause trouble with recent software.
That would be nice to have, of
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 11:19:04AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > I believe 3D on m68k is rather useless nowadays, but if someone knows better
> > than me, please shout now! :-)
> Indeed, until someone gets the Mediator going, and we can start using generic
> PCI graphics cards.
Hmmm, wasn'
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 10:03:28AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > > * Do m68k machines typically have enough horse power for OpenAL to
> > > reasonably mix the stereo stream?
> > Well, even low-horsepowered boxes like a standard A1200 can mix 4 8bit
> > Channel into 2 14bit chann
Ingo Juergensmann schrieb:
>>I'm not sure that's really all that important? I've never used any such
>>card, but OpenAL has been working nicely for me on powerpc, amd64 and
>>i386. I suspect the real questions are
>> * Do m68k machines typically have enough horse power for OpenAL to
>>
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:18:43AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > I'd like to hear if somebody knows about multi-channel soundscards, which
> > > would/could work.
> > I'm not sure that's really all that important? I've never used any such
> > car
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:18:43AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > I'd like to hear if somebody knows about multi-channel soundscards, which
> > would/could work.
> I'm not sure that's really all that important? I've never used any such
> card, but OpenAL has been working nicely for me on powerpc
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 16:07 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
> I currently cannot imagine that there is any use for openal/freealut
> and reverse depending packages on m68k machines. While I assume that
> there are soundcards for m86k, which can produce stereo sound,
Indeed, AFAIK, most m68k m
As a side note, this ICE is apparently fixed now in sid. So no patch is
required and this bug could be closed pending the outcome of the p-a-s
decision.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Am Samstag, den 15.04.2006, 12:49 -0500 schrieb Stephen R Marenka:
> > Thanks for the information that this bug is fixed with gcc-4.1, so this
> > will go away when debian switches to gcc-4.1 per default.
> >
> > But, TBH, I really don't see much point in having openal binaries for
> > m86k. I mea
20 matches
Mail list logo
