On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:16:50PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:36:49PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > It looks like the concensus is that right now there's no real point > > in building openal and friends on m68k. > > > > I've marked openal not-for-us and I'll include it in an update to p-a-s > > soon. > > > > You'll need to request to have the old m68k binaries removed. > > Ok, I will look which are the relevant binaries and file bugs against > ftp.debian.org. > > Because it was mentioned in this thread as well: how about removing > libgl/libglu implementations. Well, it seems that mesa would be another > promising candidate for removal.
It's not necessary, is it? OpenGL works perfectly fine on m68k. Like I said before, if we start throwing out packages "because they're not useful anyway", we could just as well stop the port. If you, as the maintainer of OpenAL, feel that it is pointless to support it on m68k, then that is your prerogative. But it is not for you to say that we should remove anything else. Thanks. -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
