Package: ftp.debian.org Please remove the following m68k binary packages from unstable.
Discussion about this happened here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2006/04/msg00021.html xpilot-ng-client-x11_1:4.7.2-1.1 xpilot-ng-client-sdl_1:4.7.2-1.1 rss-glx_8.0.5-5 python-openal_0.1.5-1 libosgal-cvs1_20060215-5 libopenalpp-cvs1_20060217-2 libopenal-dev_0.2005080600-2.1+b1 flightgear_0.9.9-1 crystalspace_0.98-20040623-2.1 chromium_0.9.12-11 openal has been marked 'not-for-us' and should be in p-a-s soon, so those binaries should not come back. ----- Forwarded message from Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:37:40 +0200 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:36:49 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Debian GNU/Linux m68k <debian-68k@lists.debian.org>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#362590: FTBFS on m68k Mail-Followup-To: Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Debian GNU/Linux m68k <debian-68k@lists.debian.org>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] It looks like the concensus is that right now there's no real point in building openal and friends on m68k. I've marked openal not-for-us and I'll include it in an update to p-a-s soon. You'll need to request to have the old m68k binaries removed. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- End forwarded message ----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
