Didier 'OdyX' Raboud writes:
> Agreed. What's interesting is the ratio between the income and the
> amount requested, not any of both absolute numbers. What I envision is
> a list ordered by "days of work needed to produce the money I
> request".
I guess I'm not seeing how days of work is differ
Hi
Gaudenz Steinlin writes:
>>> * Food: The contract doesn't state, that we can freely choose the
>>> meals we need and only pay for those. The contract actually says we
>>> buy full board for everyone.
>>> According to Gaudenz this was already agreed with Mr. Pianaro.
>>
>> If on a certain day
Hi
Sorry for bringing this up a bit late. I should have studied the
contract in more detail earlier.
Michele Cane writes:
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 10:56 +0200, Philipp Hug wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>>
>> Here's some feedback about points in the contract that need to be
>> changed/clarified.
>
Le dimanche, 2 septembre 2012 14.40:10, David Bremner a écrit :
> Didier 'OdyX' Raboud writes:
> > There are various ways to ask it: ask directly for the monthly income
> > (quite intrusive), "how many days of full-time job salary", ratio
> > between the requested amount and the monthly income, et
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud writes:
> There are various ways to ask it: ask directly for the monthly income (quite
> intrusive), "how many days of full-time job salary", ratio between the
> requested amount and the monthly income, etc.
These all seem pretty the same to me, up to doing some arithmetic
Daniel,
4880 per day inc VAT or ex VAT?
>
>
All prices mentioned are with VAT included.
I just want this to be stated on the contract.
> DebCamp, 7 nights, 100 people paying lowest rate, 100x7x20 = 14000
> DebConf, 6 nights, 300 people paying multiple rates, 300x7x24 = 50400
> => total = 64,40
On 02/09/12 12:07, Michele Cane wrote:
>> * Forfait for accomodation is calculated incorrectly if based on a
>> minimum 200person occupancy.
>> He just calculated 200x (most expensive rooms), but there only exist
>> 129 of those :-)
>> Much fairer would be a price based on average room price.
>
>
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 10:56 +0200, Philipp Hug wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
> Here's some feedback about points in the contract that need to be
> changed/clarified.
>
>
> * General: This is more like an order form and not a contract. We also
> need their signature! Can't they give us a more forma
On 02/09/12 11:30, Philipp Hug wrote:
> For non-swiss companies we expect to not need to charge VAT.
This is really positive and what I'm sure everyone was hoping - but when
you say `expect', does that mean it is still being investigated, or it
is subject to some application for charitable statu
Hi Philipp,
Why is that? Do you think that it's not eligible to be recognized as a
> charitable non-profit? I'm just interpolating from German law, but for
> non-profit missions you're not able to recover VAT and not obliged to
> collect
> VAT. Of course that would depend on the association being
Hi everyone,
Here's some feedback about points in the contract that need to be
changed/clarified.
* General: This is more like an order form and not a contract. We also need
their signature! Can't they give us a more formal contract?
* Food: The contract doesn't state, that we can freely choose
* Philipp Kern (pk...@debian.org) [120901 20:51]:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:21:09AM +0200, Philipp Hug wrote:
> > The budget of dc13 is above the limit where you have to start paying VAT,
> > whereas debian.ch's budget isn't and won't be in the near future.
>
> Why is that? Do you think that it
12 matches
Mail list logo
