hi,
indeed currently only UTF-7 (ascii) is supported - and that's not going to
change because imap4 specifications require it. However there exist escaping
methods for naming mailboxes; you should read the rfc (2060) . The escaping
mechanism is not yet implemented i'm afraid - perhaps you could tr
hi philip,
in fact they are dying: otherwise the PID would have stayed the same for
those messages; however there seems to be a problem as you normally don't
get a lot of those suicides. What is your current POP3D_CHILD_MAX_CONNECTS
value in the config table? Is it the newly created process that
sure - just change the settings in config.h
- Original Message -
From: "Igor Olemskoi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:36 AM
Subject: [Dbmail] mysql.sock
> is it possible to use /tmp/mysql.sock (not localhost)?
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor
Why use messageblks? Well, for one reason, mysql has a limit on the record
size so a split-up is necessary anyway. The system was chosen to handle big
messages in chunks.
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Przyswa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:52 PM
Subject: RE
09-24 at 18:03, Sam Przyswa wrote:
> Roel Rozendaal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait:
> >
> >Why use messageblks? Well, for one reason, mysql has a limit on the record
> >size so a split-up is necessary anyway. The system was chosen to handle big
> >messages in chunks.
> &
Honestly I don't think using "select " or "select *" is a big
speed difference - it's more like the ultimate fine tuning. I think
dramatic results can be achieved by developing a table layout/imap logic
that minimizes the number of queries and the amount of parsing done by
the imap server.
On Tue
imap is obliged by rfc to allow simulatneous sessions; for pop we thought of
it as a feature :-) A lock for pop to prevent simultaneous sessions could be
implemented; any known list of pro/contra arguments?
- Original Message -
From: "Micah Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday
Think that is the case however this would indicate a more serious bug as
it's pid-entry isn't supposed to be cleared except on child exit. Try
placing a exit(0) (and a trace(_ERROR) message) just after the for loop and
see what happens..
regards roel
- Original Message -
From: "Philip War
x27;m still figuring out if the same thing
> goes
> for the imap daemon.
>
> I'm not sure if this has been dealt with in the CVS since I'm running
> the RC3
> version (on FreeBSD 4.6.2-RELEASE) and haven't gotten around to looking
> into
> that.
>
> Rega
low for us but only the administrators are using IMAP, the bulk
> of our users are using POP3.
>
> Michael Rose, Jr.
> Office: (206) 686-7600
> Fax: (206) 374-8126
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Eelco has taken the whole month of september off for a holiday :-)
- Original Message -
From: "Bret Baptist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Still getting failed suicides...
> On Wednesday 25 September
Hi all,
There have been some comments on the fact that the current release
candidate is over six months old - well that wouldn't be too much of a
problem if there hadn't been a lot of changes. IMAP has significant
speed improvements, the daemonizing scheme for both POP and IMAP has
had some m
h eudora as its syncing method is
intrinsically slow.
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 12:12, Philip Warner wrote:
> At 11:09 10/07/2002 +0200, Roel Rozendaal wrote:
>
> >what exactly do you mean by 'mailbox rebuild'? The imap search command
> >is not yet optimized and does wor
hi everyone,
just skimming through the mails on the list and i noticed that several
of you think of dbmail-smtp-injector as the replacement of dbmail-smtp.
While it's true that it will eventually replace dbmail-smtp (offering
the same functionality with speed improvements) it still is under
cons
was there a lot of work involved installing amavis? we've been asked to
implement an email-virus filter for a customer for a dbmail system.
Could you tell us some more about your amavis-solution? thanks!
regards roel
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 15:43, Bret Baptist wrote:
> On Sunday 11 August 2002 10:
Hi,
currently there is no support for public folders; plans have been made
to implement them - lack of time has prevented those plans from being
brought to practice :( For now i cannot say when shared folders will be
implemented but it would be very unlikely to expect them in the final
stable-stab
Hi,
i'm not sure what exactly your problem is - what functionality is
missing 8859-1 charset support?
regards roel
On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 16:54, Sam Przyswa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have some problems with Squirrelmail on DBmail about the ISO-8859-1
> charset not
> supported by DBmail, does this wil
Hi john,
how fast does the imap server respond if you open a telnet session to the
server? And what is the speed difference if you connect to localhost (i.e.
running telnet on the imap server machine)?
regards roel
- Original Message -
From: "John Wall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Mon
Hi,
indeed this problem needs to be addressed; let's think it over before
implementing an ad-hoc solution right away :)
Are there more server-specific options like the bind-ip? Probably yes.
We still like the idea of a centralized configuration scheme; maybe we
could just amend the config table wi
Hi everyone,
i certainly love the idea of a to-do list before going to the final 1.0
version.. Regrettably, we hardly have had time to even scan through this
mailing list the past few months - that's why a number of the patches
supplied haven't been implemented yet. Hope to fix that somewhere soon
Hi all,
indeed, as Marc pointed out, some structure and work is needed right now. My
idea of the previous TODO-list question was to be able to gather the essential
points to include for the final first release. New plan: I will scan all
replies to this message every day for requests. Just one l
Hi,
we do like this idea but i think it would be best to retain this in the
long-term todo list - that is not scheduling it for release 1.0. It simply
is a major change to the table structure. Besides we would like to discuss
the current structure to see what other optimizations/changes would be
f
me to :)
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 21:27, Sam Przyswa wrote:
> Roel Rozendaal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >we do like this idea but i think it would be best to retain this in the
> >long-term todo list - that is not scheduling it for release 1.0.
, , 'to', '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> , , 'from', '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> etc.
>
See the other mail i send; would like this in the future.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 02:08 PM 11/09/2002 +0200, Roel Rozendaal wrote:
> >Hi all,
>
Hi,
i'm going home now; this is what i've gathered today:
REQUEST WHO WHY
multiple usernamesMarc Mackay uses 2 ISP's and 1
dbmail
MAIL_PORT & AUTH_PORT Philip Warner multiple pgSQL instan
just add them both to the aliases table; the dbmail-smtp program will
scan first for user deliveries while domain-forwards are used if nothing
else is found.
If you want to deliver mail for "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to user "user"
as well you should add an alias for [EMAIL PROTECTED] -->
[EMAIL PROTECTED
26 matches
Mail list logo
