Hi,

we do like this idea but i think it would be best to retain this in the
long-term todo list - that is not scheduling it for release 1.0. It simply
is a major change to the table structure. Besides we would like to discuss
the current structure to see what other optimizations/changes would be
favorable.

regards roel


----- Original Message -----
From: "Sam Przyswa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <dbmail@dbmail.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Again: TODO


> Philip Warner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> >
> >A few suggestions...
> >
>
> [...]
>
> >4. Nice-to-have: break up mail headers into a table
> >---------------------------------------------------
> >
> >ie. parse the mail headers and store (a copy?) in a separate table. eg.
> >
> >Create Table message_headers(id, message_idnr, header, value) might
contain:
> >   <unique-id>, <message-id>, 'to', '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> >   <unique-id>, <message-id>, 'from', '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>
> We have talking about this a couple of month ago, these headers fields
might be
> into messages table as the flags, it will be nice for search features or
CRM app
> with the right indices.
>
> Thanks in advance for these changes.
>
> Sam.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dbmail mailing list
> Dbmail@dbmail.org
> https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
>

Reply via email to