The basic layout for dbmail was based upon pop3 but we are interested in better schemes for imap. One of the main goals right now is to have the fastest imap server around. Better table layouts would mean a great improvement; just don't know how much time will be involved in implementing those. Things to do right now in my opinion are to fix annoying bugs and update the package with the several patches we have to release a STABLE 1.0 version asap. Right after that we can start playing with the table layouts and imap server logic to maximize speed for a 2.0 imap update.
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 18:03, Sam Przyswa wrote: > Roel Rozendaal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait: > > > >Why use messageblks? Well, for one reason, mysql has a limit on the record > >size so a split-up is necessary anyway. The system was chosen to handle big > >messages in chunks. > > > > Ok, I guessed that there is a good reason to do that, but it's possible to use > messageblks only to store the body part of the mail, then we don't need to > accede > to it to fetch the headers fields by putting them into the messages table, > what > did you think about ? > > Sam. > -- > Sam Przyswa - Chef de projet > Arial Concept - Intégrateur Internet > 36, rue de Turin - 75008 - Paris > Tel: 01 40 54 86 04 - Fax: 01 40 54 83 01 > Web: http://www.arial-concept.com - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________ > Dbmail mailing list > Dbmail@dbmail.org > https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
