On Dec 6, 2007 5:06 PM, Jack F Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jfv 2007-12-07 01:06:42 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
> Log:
> MFC of a few important fixes done in RELENG_7 to 6
> - WITNE
On 11/6/07, Jack F Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jfv 2007-11-07 01:33:29 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
> Log:
> This delta addresses some users experiencing watchdogs under load with
> t
On 2007-09-10 21:50, Jack F Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jfv 2007-09-10 21:50:40 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
> Log:
> A number of small fixes:
> - duplicate #define in header, thanks to Kevin Lo for pointing o
On 11/10/06, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jack,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 09:30:27AM +, Jack F Vogel wrote:
J> jfv 2006-11-10 09:30:27 UTC
J>
J> FreeBSD src repository
J>
J> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
J> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
J> Log
Jack,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 09:30:27AM +, Jack F Vogel wrote:
J> jfv 2006-11-10 09:30:27 UTC
J>
J> FreeBSD src repository
J>
J> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
J> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
J> Log:
J> This patch redesigns the watchdog timer. The o
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 10:06:21AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
J> >J> jfv 2006-10-28 00:47:55 UTC
J> >J>
J> >J> FreeBSD src repository
J> >J>
J> >J> Modified files:
J> >J> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h if_em_hw.c if_em_hw.h
J> >J> if_em_osdep.h
J> >J>
On 10/28/06, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 12:47:55AM +, Jack F Vogel wrote:
J> jfv 2006-10-28 00:47:55 UTC
J>
J> FreeBSD src repository
J>
J> Modified files:
J> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h if_em_hw.c if_em_hw.h
J>
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 12:47:55AM +, Jack F Vogel wrote:
J> jfv 2006-10-28 00:47:55 UTC
J>
J> FreeBSD src repository
J>
J> Modified files:
J> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h if_em_hw.c if_em_hw.h
J> if_em_osdep.h
J> Log:
J> This is the merg
On 10/28/06, Hiroki Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Jack Vogel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
jf> On 10/28/06, Hiroki Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jf> > Jack F Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
jf> > in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
jf> >
jf> > jf> jfv 2006-10-28 01:37:1
"Jack Vogel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
jf> On 10/28/06, Hiroki Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jf> > Jack F Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
jf> > in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
jf> >
jf> > jf> jfv 2006-10-28 01:37:14 UTC
jf> > jf>
jf> > jf> FreeBSD src repository
jf>
On 10/28/06, Hiroki Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jack F Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
jf> jfv 2006-10-28 01:37:14 UTC
jf>
jf> FreeBSD src repository
jf>
jf> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
jf> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h if_em_hw.
Jack F Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
jf> jfv 2006-10-28 01:37:14 UTC
jf>
jf> FreeBSD src repository
jf>
jf> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
jf> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h if_em_hw.c if_em_hw.h
jf> if_em_osdep.
Max Laier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Saturday 09 September 2006 08:19, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> > pdeuskar2006-09-09 06:19:20 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
> > Log:
> > Add support for TSO. Thanks to Andre for
On Saturday 09 September 2006 08:19, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> pdeuskar2006-09-09 06:19:20 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
> Log:
> Add support for TSO. Thanks to Andre for adding support in the stack
> and Jack Vogel for d
On 8/13/06, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yongari 2006-08-14 01:50:54 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
Log:
Overhaul Rx path to recover from mbuf cluster allocation failure.
o Create one more spare DMA map for Rx hand
On 8/15/06, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 02:49, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 01:30:37PM -0700, Matt Reimer wrote:
> > On 8/13/06, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >yongari 2006-08-14 01:50:54 UTC
> > >
> > > FreeBSD src
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 02:49, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 01:30:37PM -0700, Matt Reimer wrote:
> > On 8/13/06, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >yongari 2006-08-14 01:50:54 UTC
> > >
> > > FreeBSD src repository
> > >
> > > Modified files:
> > >s
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 01:30:37PM -0700, Matt Reimer wrote:
> On 8/13/06, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >yongari 2006-08-14 01:50:54 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> >sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
> > Log:
> > Overhaul Rx path t
On Monday 14 August 2006 16:30, Matt Reimer wrote:
> On 8/13/06, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > yongari 2006-08-14 01:50:54 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
> > Log:
> > Overhaul Rx path to recover fro
On 8/13/06, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yongari 2006-08-14 01:50:54 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
Log:
Overhaul Rx path to recover from mbuf cluster allocation failure.
o Create one more spare DMA map for Rx hand
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:45:56PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
> P> Is there a report on what coverty found with if_em_hw.c?
>
> Coverity complains that the return value of em_read_phy_reg() is
> somtimes checked and sometimes is not. Can you please tell, whether
> this is important report or c
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:45:56PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 04:21:49PM +, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
T> P> > Thanks. Any objections about merging the HEAD to RELENG_6 soon?
T> P>
T> P> Jack Vogel is doing the merge - I will send it out to you for review.
T> P> So let
Prafulla,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 04:21:49PM +, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
P> > Thanks. Any objections about merging the HEAD to RELENG_6 soon?
P>
P> Jack Vogel is doing the merge - I will send it out to you for review.
P> So let us plan on committing early next week?
The merge is very simple
Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> >Gleb Smirnoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Prafulla,
> >>
> >>On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:05:05PM +, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> >>P> pdeuskar2006-08-03 19:05:05 UTC
> >>P>
> >>P> FreeBSD src repository
> >>P>
> >>P>
Gleb Smirnoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:38:25PM +, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> P> > P> Revert back changes to made in rev 1.109 of if_em.c which were
> unnecessary.
> P> > P> This makes it easier for us to get the changes into -current and to
> -stable quickly.
>
From: Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:54:14 +0400
> Prafulla,
>
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:05:05PM +, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> P> pdeuskar2006-08-03 19:05:05 UTC
> P>
&g
From: Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 01:14:54 -0700
> Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > Yeah, it's a thing to watch out for. As are __TIME__ and __DATE__.
>
> FWIW, the following files in 6.1-
Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
Gleb Smirnoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Prafulla,
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:05:05PM +, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
P> pdeuskar2006-08-03 19:05:05 UTC
P>
P> FreeBSD src repository
P>
P> Modified files:
P> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
P> Log:
P>
On Friday 04 August 2006 03:46, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 09:23:23AM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:19:09AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > >
> > > As a general remark, it is a very good idea to keep large style(9)
> > > sweeps separate from actual co
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:38:25PM +, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
P> > P> Revert back changes to made in rev 1.109 of if_em.c which were
unnecessary.
P> > P> This makes it easier for us to get the changes into -current and to
-stable quickly.
P> >
P> > Can you please confirm that this was a
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 12:49:09AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote..
> Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > Changing style(9) shouldn't alter the binary code produced, and
> > this can be 100% verified using cmp(1), diff(1), cksum(1), or md5(1).
>
> With md5(1), you can only 99.94579% verify it. :-)
Gleb Smirnoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Prafulla,
>
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:05:05PM +, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> P> pdeuskar2006-08-03 19:05:05 UTC
> P>
> P> FreeBSD src repository
> P>
> P> Modified files:
> P> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
> P> Log:
> P> Rev
Prafulla,
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:05:05PM +, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
P> pdeuskar2006-08-03 19:05:05 UTC
P>
P> FreeBSD src repository
P>
P> Modified files:
P> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
P> Log:
P> Revert back changes to made in rev 1.109 of if_em.c which were u
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:46:57AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 09:23:23AM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:19:09AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > >
> > > As a general remark, it is a very good idea to keep large style(9)
> > > sweeps separate from
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> Yeah, it's a thing to watch out for. As are __TIME__ and __DATE__.
FWIW, the following files in 6.1-RELEASE/i386 contain build timestamps:
/boot/GENERIC/hptmv.ko
/boot/GENERIC/kernel
/boot/SMP/hptmv.ko
/boot/SMP/kernel
/boot/loader
/boot/pxeboot
/etc/mail/freebsd.cf
/etc/mail
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 12:49:09AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > Changing style(9) shouldn't alter the binary code produced, and
> > this can be 100% verified using cmp(1), diff(1), cksum(1), or md5(1).
>
> With md5(1), you can only 99.94579% verify it. :-)
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 09:52:31AM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:46:57AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 09:23:23AM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:19:09AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As a general rem
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> Changing style(9) shouldn't alter the binary code produced, and
> this can be 100% verified using cmp(1), diff(1), cksum(1), or md5(1).
With md5(1), you can only 99.94579% verify it. :-)
Colin Percival
___
cvs-all@fr
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 09:23:23AM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:19:09AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> >
> > As a general remark, it is a very good idea to keep large style(9)
> > sweeps separate from actual code changes even if they are tiny.
> > Changing style(9) shou
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:19:09AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
>
> As a general remark, it is a very good idea to keep large style(9)
> sweeps separate from actual code changes even if they are tiny.
> Changing style(9) shouldn't alter the binary code produced, and
> this can be 100% verified using c
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 01:25:14AM +, John Birrell wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 06:15:34PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> > Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> > > Modified files:
> > > sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
> > > Log:
> > > Revert back changes to made in rev 1.109 of if_em.
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 06:15:34PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> > Modified files:
> > sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
> > Log:
> > Revert back changes to made in rev 1.109 of if_em.c which were
> > unnecessary.
> > This makes it easier for us to get th
Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> Modified files:
> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
> Log:
> Revert back changes to made in rev 1.109 of if_em.c which were unnecessary.
> This makes it easier for us to get the changes into -current and to -stable
> quickly.
I assume you've discussed thi
Nate Lawson wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Scott Long writes:
> However, taskqueues are really just a proof of concept for what I
really
> want, which is to allow drivers to register both a fast handler
and an
> ithread handler. For drivers doing this, the ithread would
Nate Lawson writes:
> Scott Long wrote:
> > Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> >
> >> Scott Long writes:
> >> > However, taskqueues are really just a proof of concept for what I
> >> really
> >> > want, which is to allow drivers to register both a fast handler and an
> >> > ithread handler. Fo
Scott Long wrote:
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Scott Long writes:
> However, taskqueues are really just a proof of concept for what I
really
> want, which is to allow drivers to register both a fast handler and an
> ithread handler. For drivers doing this, the ithread would be private
Ah, the
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Scott Long writes:
>
> Touching the APIC is tricky. First, you have to pay the cost of a
> spinlock. Then you have to may the cost of at least one read and write
> across the FSB. Even though the APIC registers are memory mapped, they
> are still uncached. It's
Scott Long writes:
>
> Touching the APIC is tricky. First, you have to pay the cost of a
> spinlock. Then you have to may the cost of at least one read and write
> across the FSB. Even though the APIC registers are memory mapped, they
> are still uncached. It's not terribly expensive,
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
scottl 2006-01-11 00:30:25 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
Log:
Significant performance improvements for the if_em driver:
Very cool.
- If possible, use a fast inter
Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> scottl 2006-01-11 00:30:25 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
> Log:
> Significant performance improvements for the if_em driver:
Very cool.
> - If possible, use a fast interupt hand
50 matches
Mail list logo
