Jack F Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
  in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

jf> jfv         2006-10-28 01:37:14 UTC
jf>
jf>   FreeBSD src repository
jf>
jf>   Modified files:        (Branch: RELENG_6)
jf>     sys/dev/em           if_em.c if_em.h if_em_hw.c if_em_hw.h
jf>                          if_em_osdep.h
jf>   Log:
jf>   Merge of Intel 6.2.9 em driver code.
jf>   Approved by: re, scottl, jhb, pdeuskar
jf>
jf>   Revision   Changes    Path
jf>   1.65.2.19  +731 -589  src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c
jf>   1.32.2.5   +97 -71    src/sys/dev/em/if_em.h
jf>   1.16.2.4   +574 -531  src/sys/dev/em/if_em_hw.c
jf>   1.15.2.5   +96 -148   src/sys/dev/em/if_em_hw.h
jf>   1.14.2.3   +46 -52    src/sys/dev/em/if_em_osdep.h

Just wanted to make sure, but is the following change in if_em.c
really intentional?  This means that the new version no longer
supports 82542...

Index: if_em.c
@@ -116,8 +117,6 @@
        { 0x8086, E1000_DEV_ID_82541GI_LF,      PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0},
        { 0x8086, E1000_DEV_ID_82541GI_MOBILE,  PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0},

-       { 0x8086, E1000_DEV_ID_82542,           PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0},
-
        { 0x8086, E1000_DEV_ID_82543GC_FIBER,   PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0},
        { 0x8086, E1000_DEV_ID_82543GC_COPPER,  PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0},

--
| Hiroki SATO

Attachment: pgprN4m5qy77w.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to