Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
Gleb Smirnoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Prafulla,
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:05:05PM +0000, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
P> pdeuskar 2006-08-03 19:05:05 UTC
P>
P> FreeBSD src repository
P>
P> Modified files:
P> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
P> Log:
P> Revert back changes to made in rev 1.109 of if_em.c which were unnecessary.
P> This makes it easier for us to get the changes into -current and to
-stable quickly.
Can you please confirm that this was a mechanical substitution like this:
s/sc/adapter/g
s/em_softc/adapter/g
and no more additional changes? If this is true, then I hope that we
(FreeBSD and Intel) have finally came to a common codebase. This is good. :)
I can stand the long unusual name for driver softc with no problems.
I'm only a bit disappointed by the fact, that I haven't received a single
email about these plans. You were in the void for a long time, and
then began your work with a commit, w/o informing people who were
maintaining driver while the vendor maintanance was on a hiatus.
Yes - it was a mechanical substitution.
According to [EMAIL PROTECTED] at least one non-mechanical change slipped
in breaking his Sun4v box. AFAIR some fix in/with bus_dmamap_unload()
was reverted.
--
Andre
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
