In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter
Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
The 2008 US Go Congress is August 2-9, which overlaps with the end of
the Beijing events. This makes a case for holding any such tournament
near the end of the Congress. Thanks for the tip!
In 2008, the European Go Congress
Heikki Levanto wrote:
> I am sure there is a mathematically sound way to measure
> how symmetric the evaluation is, but my math is a bit rusty,
> so I am asking if someone can come up with a good way. After
> that, I'm asking if various programmers would be willing to
> run this test, and publish
> libego is a very optimised library. indeed, very hard
> to change. If it fits your needs, go for it. Its
> simply the best you can do.
>
> BUT, If you want to try different MCGO approachs with
> libego, I'm sure it will be far more hard to change
> than using slowish java.
I've been refactorin
> Other than that, I am in the process of adding multi-thread support,
> for which I am using a boost library, which again can be compiled on
> pretty much any modern platform.
I used Boost.Thread for the first time recently (on a project nothing to
do with computer go) and it was so easy. I devel
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 10:06:42PM +0900, Darren Cook wrote:
> I've been refactoring the libego playouts to allow me to easily plug in
> different move choosing algorithms, and choose between them at run-time.
> I was willing to accept a slight slowdown, but ironically got a 5%
> speed-up (on rando
Posting that code would be really helpful! I too was thinking about
modifying libego's move choosing algorithms. But I haven't gotten
anywhere yet since I have been working on a proof of concept
experiment for what I will be planning to do later.
- George
On 6/17/07, Darren Cook <[EMAIL PROTEC
We also have just become comfortable enough with libego
to be thinking about how we intended to add the go domain
knowledge for heavier playouts.
Cheers,
David
On 17, Jun 2007, at 3:15 PM, George Dahl wrote:
Posting that code would be really helpful! I too was thinking about
modifying libeg
Let's assume the game time is set at 10 ms. A random move computer program will
win over any player in this sub-space of the universe who does not have a chip
as well as an electronic interface in his body. Would such a champion mean
anything?
-Original Message-
From: Don Dailey <[EMAI
Hi,
Today I received the email below. I have not
way of knowing if the any of the spam I get is from having
an address visible through this list. Can people who
post frequently address this? Do you experience new
spam after posting here?
I suspect that although it is possible t
i haven't found that i've received any additonal spam as a result of
being a member of (or of posting to) this list.
knock on wood.
s.
- Original Message
From: the Robot Vegetable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: computer-go@computer-go.org
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007 10:16:44 PM
Subject: [comp
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 21:02 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Let's assume the game time is set at 10 ms. A random move computer
> program will win over any player in this sub-space of the universe who
> does not have a chip as well as an electronic interface in his body.
> Would such a champion
Spam is so prevalent that I've pretty well given up and assumed that one will
get lots of it. Fortunately,
yahoo is pretty good about filtering most of it. Certain addresses are never
used on mailing lists. Beyond
that, I just ignore the pesky stuff.
Terry McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
They mea
I get lots of spam in my yahoo inbox but gmail almost perfectly
filters all the spam out of my inbox.
On 6/17/07, terry mcintyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Spam is so prevalent that I've pretty well given up and assumed that one
will get lots of it. Fortunately,
yahoo is pretty good about filt
> I think Remi was making the point that the CrazyStone games were played
> at a time control not usually played in serious games. Therefore he
> concludes the rating was inflated. ... If you spend too much time
> building up a won position, how can you claim a "moral victory" if you
> lose on t
I recently subscribed to the computer-go mailing list, and I'd really like
to join some of the discussions, but I noticed that on the archives (
http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/) only simple email obfuscation
is used. For example "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" would appear as "johndoe at
yahoo.c
15 matches
Mail list logo
