I recently checked so-called public relase 3 (essentially the same as
the initial release, right?) as well and its 4 core version shows
over 330% in top command. So, I believe the big version doesn't have
the same parallelism.
This % is quite boring and complicated :-)
The % decreases with tim
Olivier Teytaud: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> One reason of this discount is that the MoGo bros running on cgos are
>> the _big versions. By my obserbation (they are running on my pcs and
>> both are Q6600/3GHz with different mother boards), mogo_big_4core's
>> perallelism is around 300% (by top comman
Ok, I've done the following:
1. free up space on CGOS - should be good for a few weeks/months
2. updated allTime list.
3. updated archives with march and april games.
- Don
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.com
Ok, I made some more space on the server - we should be good for a
few more weeks.
- Don
Don Dailey wrote:
I'm trying to update the all-time ratings list for CGOS but I have a 1
gig limit on the server and CGOS has reached it.So I'm going to
prepare this off-line. So it should be
David Fotland wrote:
> So I'm curious then. With simple UCT (no rave, no priors, no progressive
> widening), many people said the best constant was about 0.45. What
are the
> new concepts that let you avoid the constant?
Whatever concepts are used it must indirectly be a question of
improved
Is the true scalability of mogo (against a variety of programs, or against
people) less than the rating study indicates?
Unfortunately, I think that the answer is yes (very very).
In particular the tuning has been performed on small games,
and I guess the new very fast (parallel) versions of mo
One reason of this discount is that the MoGo bros running on cgos are
the _big versions. By my obserbation (they are running on my pcs and
both are Q6600/3GHz with different mother boards), mogo_big_4core's
perallelism is around 300% (by top command), perhaps due to its
heavier uct part (just my
I'm trying to update the all-time ratings list for CGOS but I have a 1
gig limit on the server and CGOS has reached it.So I'm going to
prepare this off-line. So it should be up later.
I'm not sure if CGOS will continue to operate during the week, but I
don't have time to clean it up and
Hideki Kato wrote:
David Fotland: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The scalability study showed that mogo gains almost 100 rating points per
doubling of performance.
But on CGOS, there is mogo 1 CPU and mogo 4 CPU. I would expect the 4 CPU
mogo to be 150 rating points or more higher than 1 CPU. But
David Fotland: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>The scalability study showed that mogo gains almost 100 rating points per
>doubling of performance.
>
>But on CGOS, there is mogo 1 CPU and mogo 4 CPU. I would expect the 4 CPU
>mogo to be 150 rating points or more higher than 1 CPU. But it is actually
>only 4
David Fotland wrote:
The scalability study showed that mogo gains almost 100 rating points per
doubling of performance.
But on CGOS, there is mogo 1 CPU and mogo 4 CPU. I would expect the 4 CPU
mogo to be 150 rating points or more higher than 1 CPU. But it is actually
only 40 points higher.
The scalability study showed that mogo gains almost 100 rating points per
doubling of performance.
But on CGOS, there is mogo 1 CPU and mogo 4 CPU. I would expect the 4 CPU
mogo to be 150 rating points or more higher than 1 CPU. But it is actually
only 40 points higher.
I guess this is because
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jason
House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 14:22 +0100, Tom wrote:
>From the website http://www.gokgs.com/tournInfo.jsp?id=380 and the fact
that it hasn't started, I deduce that it starts at 1500 GMT, or about 40
minutes time.
I think you mean
On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 14:22 +0100, Tom wrote:
> >From the website http://www.gokgs.com/tournInfo.jsp?id=380 and the fact
> that it hasn't started, I deduce that it starts at 1500 GMT, or about 40
> minutes time.
I think you mean 1h40m?
>
> On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 11:00 +0100, Nick Wedd wrote:
> >
>From the website http://www.gokgs.com/tournInfo.jsp?id=380 and the fact
that it hasn't started, I deduce that it starts at 1500 GMT, or about 40
minutes time.
On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 11:00 +0100, Nick Wedd wrote:
> Reminder - it starts in a few hours (13:00 GMT), five hours after the
> time of pos
Reminder - it starts in a few hours (13:00 GMT), five hours after the
time of posting this).
Nick
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nick Wedd
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Registration is now open for this Sunday's bot tournament. It will use
19x19 boards for both divisions, which will be 6-roun
16 matches
Mail list logo
