I'm trying to update the all-time ratings list for CGOS but I have a 1
gig limit on the server and CGOS has reached it. So I'm going to
prepare this off-line. So it should be up later.
I'm not sure if CGOS will continue to operate during the week, but I
don't have time to clean it up and I will be gone for the week.
Hopefully, it will continue to run until I get back. I may be able
to do some minor cleanups in order to help it continue.
- Don
Don Dailey wrote:
Hideki Kato wrote:
David Fotland: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The scalability study showed that mogo gains almost 100 rating
points per
doubling of performance.
But on CGOS, there is mogo 1 CPU and mogo 4 CPU. I would expect the
4 CPU
mogo to be 150 rating points or more higher than 1 CPU. But it is
actually
only 40 points higher.
I'm also wondering this for months.
One reason of this discount is that the MoGo bros running on cgos are
the _big versions. By my obserbation (they are running on my pcs and
both are Q6600/3GHz with different mother boards), mogo_big_4core's
perallelism is around 300% (by top command), perhaps due to its
heavier uct part (just my guess).
I guess this is because in the rating study mogo was mostly playing
other
mogo versions. A the faster mogo can see everything the weaker mogo
sees,
and more.
I'm not sure. Mogo_big_4core's winning rate against mogo_big_1core
is about 60% (1641 / 2743) which corresponds only +70 ELO and current
rating difference on cgos is about 40, as you wrote. According to
the scaling rule of mc playouts, it should be 160 ELO (log2(3) * 100
= 158.5).
But against other programs on CGOS, there will be weaknesses common
to both
fast and slow mogo, that other programs might exploit.
Is the true scalability of mogo (against a variety of programs, or
against
people) less than the rating study indicates?
I believe their current ratings on cgos indicate so.
You should look on the All Time Ratings list to get a more correct
picture. I will try to update it today but we still have 551 games
on the all time list for mogo-big-4 core:
It shows mogo-big-4core as 2563 +35 -35
and mogo-big-1core as 2480 +24 -24
Also, don't forget that 4 cores are not as efficient as 1 core, so
we shouldn't expect this to be as good as the 1 core version running
4x longer. I would expect it to be much better than 2x though -
perhaps the mogo team can comment on that.
- Don
Hideki
David
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kato)
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
