y, June 15, 2015 11:26 AM
To: Jean-Francois J Rivard; cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: davepulaski
Subject: Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls
Thanks for all the info François! Yes I've come to accept that those stern
thru-hulls are in fact above DWL, regardless of what the painted waterline
ed at by a qualified rigger (I did)
Regards,
-Francois Rivard
1990 34+ "Take five"
Lake Lanier, GA
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:22:13 -0400
From: Joel Aronson
To: "cnc-list@cnc-list.com"
Subject: Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls
Message-ID:
Content-Type: tex
rest of us lake and coastal cruisers: Keep sailing and taking
> reasonable care of your rig.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Francois
> 1990 34+ "Take Five"
> Lake Lanier, GA
>
>
>
>
>
> From: davepulaski
> To:
le Galaxy Note 2
Original message
From: Jean-Francois J Rivard
Date: 06/15/2015 10:45 (GMT-05:00)
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: davepula...@hotmail.com
Subject: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls
Hi David,
Congrats on getting the 34+. I've owned mine for 3 years and
om: Jean-Francois J Rivard
Date: 06/15/2015 10:45 (GMT-05:00)
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: davepula...@hotmail.com
Subject: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls
Hi David,
Congrats on getting the 34+. I've owned mine for 3 years and still think I
could not have possibly gotten a better
u want.
-Francois Rivard
1990 34+ "Take Five"
Lake Lanier, GA
Subject: Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I said "appear" to be below the waterline because the boat's not in the
water, isn
ffler, and blow it out the hose.
Chuck
Resolute
1990 C&C 34R
Broad Creek, Magothy River, Md
- Original Message -
From: "John Pennie via CnC-List"
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: "John Pennie"
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 2:57:31 PM
Subject: Re: Stus-Li
We had this issue on both our 34+ and 51. Yes, the original design was without
seacocks as they are just above the waterline and hide neatly under the transom
skirt. Heeled and under power is a different story and they will be under
water. it came up on a few surveys and rightfully so. We ne
Assuming your boat sits on the lines it was designed for, those through
hulls should be just above the waterline and I'd typical for the Rob Ball
designs of late 80s early 90s. It will only be a couple of inches above WL
but they were very smartly designed to remain so (at anchor) and they keep
the
[Resending to list with your image removed since it exceeded msg size
limits]
Oh, yeah those look below waterline, I would want seacocks on them. I was
thinking your transom extended further back + up, but those are below the
bootstripe and close to the rudder.
You could also combine the two scup
I said "appear" to be below the waterline because the boat's not in the
water, isn't going in the water anytime soon, and I've never actually
seen one of these in the water :) All four thru-hulls are under the
transom counter and below the boot stripe as well as below the waterline
as defined
el. I'm
pretty paranoid about below waterline thruhulls but for the transom ones
I've decided there are bigger risks to fry first.
-Patrick
C&C LF38
Seattle, WA
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:00 AM, wrote:
>
> From: David Pulaski
> To: "CnC-List@cnc-list.com"
> Cc:
&g
So I'm the proud new owner of a '90 34+, and the first project I bit off was
replacement of the exhaust hose from the muffer back, including the thru-hull.
First off, this is not going to be fun because the hose runs under the fuel
tank and span of the cockpit under the water heater where it is
13 matches
Mail list logo
