Re: CloudStack Collab Conference - Key Signing Opportunity

Yep great idea. This will be an exception to the "What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas" rule. ;) On Oct 2, 2012, at 8:56 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > For those of us that will be at the CloudStack collab conference, it's > a great opportunity for some key signing to occur. As it stands right >

Re: CloudStack Collab Conference - Key Signing Opportunity

ect > www.backbonetechnology.com > - > kel...@bbits.ca > > address: 55 East 7th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5T 1M4 > tel: +1 604 713 8560 ext:114   > fax: +1 604 605 0964 > skype: kelcey.damage > > > -Original Message- > From: John Kinsella [

Re: Input requested: (Was: Incubator PMC/Board report for Oct 2012 ([ppmc]))

I'm on the PPMC as well now. :) Otherwise looks good - thanks for putting it together! On Oct 2, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Draft of board report - suggestions, corrections, and additions are > welcome. > > If possible, please give feedback no later than tomorrow morning > (O

Re: 4.0 branch and Eclipse debugging

I just put up a wiki page for this at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Using+Eclipse+With+CloudStack as I expect this will be a common question. Thanks to Darren for the instructions! John On Oct 4, 2012, at 4:13 AM, Busy Dev wrote: > Hi, > > I recently switched to the

Re: Moving JIRA emails to a separate list

From my POV I don't think it's going to change much for the committers, but have at it. The Jira emails already have a distinguishing subject... On Oct 6, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Outback Dingo wrote: > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Hugo Trippaers > wrote: >> +1 >> > > ++1 their clouding whats

Re: Moving JIRA emails to a separate list

ed with the project. > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:31 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > >> From my POV I don't think it's going to change much for the committers, >> but have at it. The Jira emails already have a distinguishing subject... >> >> On Oct 6, 2012, at

Re: IRC nicks

jlkinsel On Oct 6, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Hey, > > Can all committers (including PMC/mentors) of the project please provide me > with their IRC nicks? > > I want to set you all up as opers on the public channels, and additionally > grant access to the private PMC channel. > >

[CVE-2012-4501] CloudStack security announcement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 CVE-2012-4501: Apache CloudStack configuration vulnerability Severity: Critical Vendors: The Apache Software Foundation Citrix, Inc. Versions Affected: As no official releases have been made, this does not affect any official Apache CloudStack rel

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, first round

+1 (binding) Awesome work guys! On Oct 10, 2012, at 6:21 PM, "Chip Childers (ASF)" wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release > 4.0.0-incubating. > > Instructions for Validating and Testing the artifacts can be found here: > https://cwiki.apac

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, first round

+1 (binding) Completed smoke test last night, will be doing upgrade testing later today. On Oct 11, 2012, at 2:04 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > Chip, > > Thanks for calling the vote! I'll take a look later. :D > > Just one quick note. We might want to include a step in the testing > procedure tha

Re: CloudStack blog

I've got a test config file in place, waiting for Infra to set things up, currently. On Oct 12, 2012, at 8:59 AM, "Kelceydamage@bbits" wrote: > Any updates on the planet aggregator? > > Thanks. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 12, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > >> Please let us

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we simplify our release source archive format from 2 to 1?

bz2 seems pretty standard to me by now… For the 10/10 RC, the tar.gz was 10895157B, when I re-compressed as .tar.bz2 it's 8536610 - 22% smaller. For a few hundred downloads, the ASF servers (and various ISPs) will thank you... John On Oct 12, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Fri,

Re: May I know why is the "cloud-sccs" Information no longer available

Probably related - when I run "./waf install" on a clean source tree, I get… "Unable to install the file 'sccs-info' (not found in dir:///usr/src/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src)" The file's getting created - if I run the same cmd a second time everything's OK. John On Oct 13, 2012, at

Re: Ui: History view

Was this user-requested? It doesn't look "minor," and looks more like something that would cause annoyance, at least IMHO... On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Sonny Chhen wrote: > Hello All, > > Below is a link to a description of a minor ui update we're calling history > view. This will allow yo

Re: what is the plan for the build system?

+1 - this makes the most sense to me. It might take a little more effort, but a seamless result would be well worth it IMHO. On Oct 17, 2012, at 10:13 AM, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Edison Su wrote: >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Noa Resare [mailt

Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?

Do we have any idea how many CS users use OVM? I suspect I know the answer to that…so, do we want to consider adding (optional) code in the future to phone home with some usage stats? On Oct 18, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Will Chan wrote: > It will take > week to get the existing OVM support to work a

Re: [VOTE][ASFCS40] Drop OVM from the supported HV list for 4.0.0-incubating release?

+1 On Oct 19, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Alex Huang wrote: > +1 We decided on a time-based release. Since OVM did not make it in time to > make it a functional product, it should not make it. > > I think this vote should have a better description. It is more a vote to say > OVM did not make the 4

best way to write db update code?

Guys - while I'm testing the 4.0 RC by upgrading from 3.0.1, I'm running into some exceptions being thrown when database upgrade SQL doesn't work (e.g. trying to add a column to a table that already has that column). I don't want to focus on the errors at this moment, but more about how we writ

Re: It's official!

Awesome job, everyone. Sorry I've been quiet the last week or two - had a family emergency that I'm catching up after. Didn't get a chance to vote, but been running the last 4.0.0-i RC for a while now and it looks great! John On Nov 6, 2012, at 12:29 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Just pushed o

Re: Review Request: Non-printable characters such as %00 or %0025 are getting stored in raw/non encoded form in the database

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8876/#review16669 --- Ship it! Ship It! - John Kinsella On Feb. 11, 2013, 12:34 p.m

Re: Question about URL Encoding for API Calls

Hm, that doesn't sit right with me…I'm sure there's a reason that's the case, but it sounds like a bug... John On Feb 19, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I've been able to make several successful API calls to CloudStack, but last > night - for the first time - I wanted to u

Re: [DISCUSS] Animesh Chaturvedi as a committer

+1 On Feb 21, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Hi, > > I like to discuss nominating Animesh as a committer. Animesh joined back in > December time frame and quickly became an advocate for CloudStack. He has > quickly come up to speed on CloudStack and on how it should work in Apache.

Re: [ACS41] Schedule reminder!

On Feb 25, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Noa Resare wrote: > > (As a sidenote, hacking around with the tomcat layered cake of startup > scripts is not easy or robust, we should definitely look into alternative > setups as soon as 4.1 is out) +1

Re: [VOTE] Change the project bylaws to modify the PMC Chair voting process and add a term length

+1 On Mar 1, 2013, at 8:16 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > As previously discussed [1], we'd like to make a change to our bylaws > [2] to modify the method of selecting a PMC chair. We also want to add > a term for the chair. > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/ifwwce657u36yuwz > [2]

Re: devcloud-kvm

very cool - hoping I can get a chance to test this out and give some feedback within the next week or so. Thanks! On Jan 10, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Guys, > I'm writing up basic instructions on how to run a devcloud-kvm virtual > machine, for KVM development. The setup is

Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support

On Jan 10, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:57 PM, John Kinsella wrote: >> From a quick glance at it's man page, looks like it can do v4 and v6 >> leases at the same time… > You mean dhcpd? > No, dnsmasq looked like it could...

Re: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened

+1 On Jan 11, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > IMO, no. I want the first issue resolved first (revert the code that > shouldn't be in the repo). Then we can talk about accepting the > donation proposal I assume is coming. > > But this is just my opinion. Anyone else? > > On Fri, Jan

[DISCUSS] ACS pre-disclosure security list

Everyone - as we're trying to define the ACS security response plan, we started considering the idea of a pre-disclosure mailing list. Membership would consist of security teams from organizations that have large installations of ACS upon which their business is critical. The idea was based on X

Re: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened

Innocent question, bare with me: These bits which we're discussing that were developed outside the ASF repo - they weren't distributed in CloudPlatform with an ASF copyright header, were they? On Jan 11, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > The email below suggests all contributions sh

Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)

On Jan 17, 2013, at 1:13 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > We should reconsider password service. It seems weird to me that if it's > ipv6 then suddenly password service is not supported. Is it the same for > user data? If these things existed for shared network in ipv4, it should > work in ipv6.

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Egress firewall rules feature for guest network for CloudStack from Citrix

+1 (binding) On Jan 17, 2013, at 7:47 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Hi, > > > > I'd like to start the process of IP Clearance for > CLOUDSTACK-2999>:Egress > firewall rules for gues

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Enhanced Baremetal Provisioning support from Citrix

+1 (binding) On Jan 15, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a > donation from Citrix for Enhanced Baremetal Provisioning > > The initial discussion is at [1]. > > The content has been posted by Frank at [2]. >

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of SRX&F5 inline mode support in CloudStack from Citrix

+1 (binding) On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Reposting with subject line VOTE > > Committers have binding votes for this decision. > > Please respond with your vote: > +1 - Accept the donation and begin the process of bringing this enhancement > to CloudStack > in v

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'providing support of optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone' from Citrix.

+1 (binding) On Jan 17, 2013, at 2:47 AM, Murali Reddy wrote: > I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a > donation from Citrix to provide Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with > Basic Zone. > > The functional specification is available at [1] and has be

Re: [VOTE} Accept a donaiton of "support security group enabled network in advanced zone" from Citrix

+1 (binding) On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Reposting with subject line VOTE > > Committers have binding votes for this decision. > > Please respond with your vote: > +1 - Accept the donation and begin the process of bringing this > +enhancement to CloudStack > in v

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of "Documentation for various features" from Citrix

+1 (binding) On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Reposting with subject line VOTE. > > Committers have binding votes for this decision. > > Please respond with your vote: > +1 - Accept the donation and begin the process of bringing this > +enhancement to CloudStack > in

bay area users group?

Hey folks - would love to set up a bay area users group - how many folks would be interested in this? Would anybody be willing to host? (will send similar to -users) Stratosec - Secure Infrastructure as a Service o: 415.315.9385 @johnlkinsella

First SF bay area cloudstack meetup!

I don't plan on mentioning all of these here, but for the first time I thought I would… The first bay area CloudStack meet up is being hosted by Brocade in San Jose on the 20th of February, from 6pm-9pm. Brief agenda: 6:00 Registration, grab a beer and pizza 6:45 An Introduction to Apache Cloud

Re: First SF bay area cloudstack meetup!

di >> Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org; Abhijith Chandrashekar; John >> Kinsella; > d...@incubator.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: First SF bay area cloudstack meetup! >> >> No, what I meant is, who is our audience? Developers? Or users? >> >> I don&#

Re: [DISCUSS][INFRA] Setting up gerrit

-1 for reasons listed by others. I think Gerrit's great, and I like the idea of peer code reviews, but my gut feel is this doesn't gel well with an open source project (happy to review examples where it's being used…) Coud we maybe enable gerrit for specific pieces of code? e.g. we should proba

Re: Static Analysis Tools

Additionally I (and others) run ACS through Fortify Source Code Analyzer. Personally I think findbugs is a bit of a toy, but anything helps... John On Nov 20, 2012, at 10:44 AM, David Nalley wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: >> >> Folks >> >> I want to g

Re: Static Analysis Tools

k. Here is the link http://scan.coverity.com/getting-started.html > > > -Original Message- > From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 11:12 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Static Analysis Tools >

Re: Static Analysis Tools

gt; John > > Agreed to your points on limiting exposure to security vulnerability but > Coverity is not known for security analysis. I am not advocating any tool in > particular the intent is more to catch bugs early on. > > Thanks > Animesh > > -Original Message-

Re: Static Analysis Tools

ailable? -Original Message----- From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 11:53 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org<mailto:cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re: Static Analysis Tools Allow me to clarify my previous statement - F

feature wish-list

Everyone - I've started a really basic features wish list in the wiki. Please feel free to add to it. At some point, we'll start to categorize things... https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Features+Wish+List

Re: feature wish-list

great idea, will add comment to the wiki On Dec 10, 2012, at 3:15 PM, prasanna wrote: > If possible can we have a link to the original mail thread (wherever > applicable) that discusses the feature? It would help to have as a > cross-reference. > > On 10 December 2012 15:12

Citrix-branded files in source tree?

Think I know the answer to this, but asking before I remove things from the source tree - Over the weekend I pulled up the CS web UI under an unknown set of circumstances that resulted in me seeing Citrix CloudPlatform branding on the screen. Just got around to investigating, and I see a few f

Re: IRC meeting tomorrow

I can run it tomorrow On Dec 11, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > A reminder - we have the weekly CloudStack IRC meeting tomorrow at 17:00 > UTC tomorrow in #CloudStack-Meeting. > > I'm attending USENIX LISA this week, so I'm going to have to miss the > meeting - anybody willing to s

Re: Email Conventions

This was a big conversation earlier this year. Summary: do whatever works for you. :) On Dec 12, 2012, at 2:50 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > As a rule of thumb, should my responses go at the top or a quoted email, the > bottom or inline? > > DL > Stratosec - Secure Infrastructure as a Servi

Re: Email Conventions

t. > > Animesh > > -Original Message- > From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 8:10 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Email Conventions > > This was a big conversation earlier this year. > >

IRC Meeting Minutes 12 December 2012

Hi all, Meeting minutes below. Please let me know if there are any questions. === #cloudstack-meeting Meeting === Meeting started by jlkinsel at 17:02:28 UTC. The full logs are available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Marketplace Update

Weighing in late here as well… First guys, appreciate the contribution. All these awesome ideas, we appreciate the work. That said, work *has* to happen in The Apache Way. Now, some comments: I would strongly recommend separation of code and data. Build Marketplace into ACS, allow it to be ea

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Marketplace Update

On Dec 12, 2012, at 3:09 PM, "Kelcey Damage (BT)" wrote: > Also has anyone thought of the logistics of hosting/operating an ecommerce > system? Who would be responsible?? What payment GW? Broker? Legalities? > Not our problem. If some 3rd party wants to set up something to handle payment/vet

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Marketplace Update

Repeating my previous comments - if Citrix wants to host a repository of images for a CloudStack Marketplace, they can do whatever they wish. These should not be listed in the default ACS install. Please remember Apache CloudStack != Citrix. On Dec 12, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Jie Feng wrote: > Dav

Re: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

I'd remove the limitation of having 30 IPs per interface. Modern OSes can support way more. Why no support for basic networking? I can see a small hosting provider with a basic setup wanting to manage web servers... John On Dec 14, 2012, at 9:37 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Hi All, > >

Re: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

aybe adjust the limit to 256. That way > it's more of a logical boundary. > > Thanks > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 15, 2012, at 8:38 AM, John Kinsella wrote: > >> I'd remove the limitation of having 30 IPs per interface. Modern OSes can >> support

Re: Citrix-branded files in source tree?

latest 4.0 branch . We could remove > this one ! > > Regards, > Pranav > > -Original Message- > From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:54 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Citrix-branded files in

public link to password reset script?

I see the link to http://cloudstack.org/dl/cloud-set-guest-password (from https://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incubating/html/Admin_Guide/add-password-management-to-templates.html ) is 404 Is the script on cloudstack.org, or should we just point folks into

Re: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

hat is already "used- >> up". To prevent tenants from hogging all the available ips, there needs to be >> limits. >> >> On 12/15/12 8:38 AM, "John Kinsella" wrote: >> >>> I'd remove the limitation of having 30 IPs per interface. Mo

Re: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

ullet, apologies. John On Dec 18, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Sorry, not sure why cloud-init is being clubbed into this feature. > > The secondary ips can be made available through the usual metadata scheme. > > On 12/18/12 10:36 AM, "John Kinsella" w

Re: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

-Original Message- >> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:56 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC >> >> cloud-init's (m

Re: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

ell, not quite. The question I might be clearly asking is: Do we build > MIPN >> now with intention to rewrite, or do we update the metadata/user-data code >> first? >> >> On Dec 18, 2012, at 10:58 AM, "Kelcey Damage (BT)" >> >> wrote: >> >

Re: [DISCUSS] What can we do to help CloudStack community be more involved

(comments inline) On Dec 18, 2012, at 10:43 AM, Alex Huang wrote: > Hi All, Hi, Alex! > I've talked to various developers on the challenges they face in > participating in the community and these are issues that I've gathered. I > hope this adds to the recent discussions about project bylaw

Re: feature discussions should be forwarded to -users list....

+1 On Dec 18, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > We should send feature discussions to the -users and -users-cn lists as well. > We should gather input from people who uses CloudStack. > > I think FS can be kept within -dev but am open to other opinions but > requirement discussion shou

Re: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

though it would be hard > to show from a large CIDR what is used/available), but we wont even be able > to tell him what is used/unused in a shared network - > > Any thoughts? > > Hari Kannan > > -Original Message- > From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratose

Re: [DISCUSS] Opennebula marketplace integration

Is there some reason this can't be discussed on the mailing list? John On Dec 19, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Pranav Saxena wrote: > Hi Sebastien , > > This does makes sense and perhaps seems to be the most logical approach to > integrate marketplace . I 'll be initiating some more discussions on the s

Re: [DISCUSS]API request throttling

Looks good - you got the one thing I would have thought of, to be able to throttle per account. I'd suspect that tracking db counts in the db itself could cause a DOS, unless the inserts are buffered? Also, how will the tracking work in clustered manager setups? I don't know what this "campo"

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Marketplace Update

On Dec 19, 2012, at 10:10 AM, Jie Feng wrote: > 4. Disable Marketplace by default or not including any listing repository by > default. > The community in general seems to be concerned about including a third party > listing repository by default. My question is if third parties do run a > list

Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support

Personally I'd prefer to put all the info in one place - maybe copy the Jira content into the wiki page. Bringing dynamic routing protocols into the picture worries me, but I haven't thought through the options, yet. Will be happy to test as this progresses - my nets are v6 numbered already, bu

Re: Changes to the wiki

ah super awesome. Thanks for doing that. Been wanting to give that thing some organization for ages On Dec 19, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Hi, > > Since Dave gave me space admin privileges, I was able to make a few changes > on the wiki. Please let me know what you think. Al

Re: [DISCUSS] Opennebula marketplace integration

marketplace and > what sort of issues we can run into while integrating it. > > Pranav > > -----Original Message- > From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 11:45 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re:

Re: [DISCUSS]API request throttling

On Dec 20, 2012, at 2:20 AM, Pranav Saxena wrote: > Also are we planning to build the code in such a way that when we take into > consideration the "throttling time " , do we have some kind off a back-off > algorithm to trigger the request again automatically ( may be in some > scenarios

Re: [DISCUSS] Cloudstack to manage User objects in LDAP

(just catching up on this thread) On Dec 20, 2012, at 6:56 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > We are already talking about more robust RBAC for operations. I can > only assume that the value in doing that will be better realized by > mapping the roles to users. That actually reinforces the user as > be

Something fun happened today...

I noticed something pop up on Twitter today - Jeff Barr over at Amazon announced a beta of their CLI for AWS I took a quick peek, was't impressed, so I voiced so back on Twitter. Jeff responded saying I could fork the code…OK. So I suggested Mr. Barr take a peek at Rohit's demo video on youtube

Re: [DISCUSS] Site Analytics?

Did we ever get this setup? On Nov 9, 2012, at 1:01 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > So - of *course* Piwik already has this well-documented. > > Here's their info on privacy and such: > > http://piwik.org/privacy/ > > So - if we went with Piwik, we'd be good on the data privacy front. > > --

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating jenkins.cs.o

Just checking in on this one as well… On Nov 4, 2012, at 1:57 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Hi folks: > > Our existing jenkins instance is housed on my AWS account [1]. > However, since its inception, the project has moved to the Apache > Software Foundation; and the ASF has its own Jenkins instanc

Re: [DISCUSS] Virtual machine's Base Image Updatation Facility

What might be interesting is to integrate Cobbler with ACS... John On Dec 25, 2012, at 10:48 PM, Harikrishna Patnala wrote: > When a user tries to create VM, following sequence of events happen with > current CloudStack implementation > > > (1)User / admin adds a template (which is stor

Re: Help Needed: How can I use an SSL certificate that contains an intermediate CA?

Chip, didya get this working? I took a quick look in the wiki and didn't see any docs on it (Sorry all, I'm obviously catching up on some old threads ) John On Nov 14, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Edison Su wrote: >> >> >>> -Original Message--

Re: [DISCUSS] Syslog enhancements

(Changed subject as noted by Alex) Question - is this feature something beyond using the syslog appender in log4j? One thing I'd like to see is logs using key-vaue pairs. The closer to that we can get, the easier it is for me to have the logs consumed by a separate analytics package. One nitpi

Re: new storage framework update

Great writeup! On the wiki page, are "motion" and "migration" interchangeable? John On Dec 27, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Edison Su wrote: > Hi All, > Before heading into holiday, I'd like to update the current status of the > new storage framework since last collab12. >1. Class diagram of pri

Re: new storage framework update

Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 12:17 PM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: RE: new storage framework update >> >> Yes, it just means move one entity(volume/snapshot/template etc) from >> one place to another. >> >>> -Original M

Re: [VOTE] Project Bylaws

+1 On Jan 2, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > We've had some good discussions on the proposed bylaws over the last > couple of weeks [1], so I'd like to move this forward to a VOTE now. > Of course, if there are still concerns or discussion points that > people want to see a

New committer: Kelcey Damage

(Apologies for sending this late, we were working on this over the Holidays and the announcement didn't go out) The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Kelcey Damage to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a com

Re: [VOTE] Project Bylaws

I was gonna comment, but figured that's where ya were going. On Jan 2, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > One quick follow up. > > If we approve the bylaw draft, I'll publish it to the website. > However, the document comes from the perspective of CloudStack being a > top level project

Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support

Good comments - keep 'em coming! On Jan 2, 2013, at 1:01 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Technically this is a very sound idea, but scale needs to be discussed. > Having static assignments in a database like we do for IPv4 could have > potential impact as the address space available is multitudes

Re: [DISCUSS] Draft Incubator PMC/Board report for Jan 2013

Status page updated. On Jan 2, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013, at 02:24 PM, David Nalley wrote: >>> The project has continuted to grow and has added several new PPMC >>> members and committers since October: >>> >>> - Edison Su, Alex Huang, Hugo Trippaers, and

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Social media

I'd love to see us standardize around hootsuite (can we get them to donate an acct, or maybe find something else free) where each person with post privs has their own login. Not that I foresee bad things happening, but the security geek in me really doesn't like shared logins... John On Jan 3,

Re: [DISCUSS] Syslog enhancements

;> whatever is logged to our current log file will get sent to syslog. >> That's >>> something someone can configure today on existing releases. Do you >> have >>> more use cases? For example, is there anything that should be logged >> to >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Syslog enhancements

this set 2). > > If we assume that (2) is a superset of (1), then IMO there is no > reason to do something different from the log4j syslog appender. On > the other hand, if there is a portion of set (1) that is not included > in set (2), then I actually think we have a logging problem

Re: [DISCUSS] Managing the cloudstack-extras github organization

On Jan 3, 2013, at 8:39 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > Although this list is officially the Apache CloudStack dev list, I > think it's also the right place to collaborate about the > cloudstack-extras Github organization ( > https://github.com/CloudStack-extras ). Any issues using this

Re: [DISCUSS] Draft Incubator PMC/Board report for Jan 2013

btw you can add jab as ppmc in there, now, in case you haven't. :) On Jan 3, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> Note - I've posted this to the wiki, but will make changes if necessary. >> Wanted to make sure it's in by deadline. >>

Re: VNC listen address for KVM

nice, hadn't considered ACLing that at the hypervisor level On Jan 4, 2013, at 12:09 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed that CLOUDSTACK-411 got resolved which is related to > CLOUDSTACK-410 > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-410 > * https://issues.apach

Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack

I believe what Manan really meant to say is he's looking for discussion on these great ideas within the community. Obviously it would be silly to expect an open source development community to just start cranking things out. On Jan 4, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Manan Shah wrote: > Hi Hugo, > > I am a

docs.cloudstack.org et al

Do we have a plan/timeframe to take these offline? Getting sorta old to google for something and have outdated info pop up above the ACS stuff, worse still when I suggest somebody else google for something and then I find them surfing the old sites...

Re: Review Request: Non-printable characters such as %00 or %0025 are getting stored in raw/non encoded form in the database

read more about that at https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Input_Validation_Cheat_Sheet - John Kinsella On Jan. 8, 2013, 5:27 a.m., Likitha Shetty wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: &

Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support

On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:17 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > > If there is no other opinions, I would begin with DHCPv6 in shared network > as first step. Sure, one suggestion: I've been using ISC's dhcpd instead of dnsmasqas they have some silly limitations (in "test" but I keep meaning to contribut

Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support

On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:31 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > >> >> On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:17 PM, Sheng Yang >> wrote: >>> >>> If there is no other opinions, I would begin with DHCPv6 in shared >>

Re: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened

So, we have nearly 1500 lines of code changes committed in CLOUDSTACK-306. There's 10 people related to the issues listed below, I believe they're all from the same employer. Folks, this is hindering our process to graduate to a top level Apache project. The first few times it's an honest mista

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of marvin automated tests from Citrix

On Jan 9, 2013, at 12:50 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to > accept a donation from Citrix of a set of marvin automated tests > developed by Clogeny, but under contract from Citrix. +1 (binding)

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out interfaces to cloud-utils or create a new artifact cloud-contract

Makes sense to me… On Jan 9, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi all, > > One of the challenges of writing good structural code in CloudStack is that > the artifacts and their classes depend on each other with no code/filesystem > structure. I want to discuss if it's a good idea to spli

  1   2   3   >