Ah, from an archive standpoint, totally makes sense. On Oct 6, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> I'm already deploying filters, for sure. But the mail-archives are very > messy and hard to use right now, and I'm thinking it might be hard for > people just getting started with the project. > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:31 PM, John Kinsella <j...@stratosec.co> wrote: > >> From my POV I don't think it's going to change much for the committers, >> but have at it. The Jira emails already have a distinguishing subject... >> >> On Oct 6, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Outback Dingo <outbackdi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Hugo Trippaers >>> <htrippa...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: >>>> +1 >>>> >>> >>> ++1 their clouding whats relevant for users, and relevant for developers >>> >>> >>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad >>>> >>>> Op 6 okt. 2012 om 02:46 heeft "Noah Slater" <nsla...@tumbolia.org> het >> volgende geschreven: >>>> >>>>> Community, >>>>> >>>>> I propose we move JIRA emails to a separate list. >>>>> >>>>> This should increase the signal:noise for the list for new >> contributors and >>>>> lurkers. >>>>> >>>>> If we did this, I would suggest that we make it a project bylaw that >> all >>>>> committers subscribe to the issues list. >>>>> >>>>> If I don't hear any objections, I will assume consensus through >> silence and >>>>> take care of this for us. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> NS >>> >> >> Stratosec - Secure Infrastructure as a Service >> o: 415.315.9385 >> @johnlkinsella >> >> > > > -- > NS Stratosec - Secure Infrastructure as a Service o: 415.315.9385 @johnlkinsella
