Yes. I could. I have included elastic -ip.xml file in the networks.xml file.
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:30 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Doc Reviews on Apache Review Board [WAS RE
Yes. I could. I have included elastic -ip.xml file in the networks.xml file.
Also, creating-network-offerings.xml is already part of the book.
-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 1:42 PM
To: cloudstack-dev
Hi,
I created two Jira tickets about this about a month ago:
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-450
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-451
They might be worth looking at!
Wido
On 12/12/2012 05:14 AM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
I'd like to resurrect this thread - as t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8566/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and anthony xu.
Description
--
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8567/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and anthony xu.
Description
--
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8568/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and anthony xu.
Description
--
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8568/
---
(Updated Dec. 13, 2012, 8:37 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pra
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8568/
---
(Updated Dec. 13, 2012, 8:38 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh updated CLOUDSTACK-594:
-
Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress)
> Update the java binding used to the
Pierre-Yves Ritschard created CLOUDSTACK-620:
Summary: Allow additional JVM opts and classpath injection
Key: CLOUDSTACK-620
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-620
Proje
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13530831#comment-13530831
]
Pierre-Yves Ritschard commented on CLOUDSTACK-620:
--
I proposed an imp
> Alex,
>
> One thing I would like us to change is the contents of the
> "Contributed By" column. We're individuals here, and organizations
> don't have any standing. So for example, instead of Contributed By:
> Citrix for a particular feature I'd like it to either be the specific
> people invol
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8180/
---
(Updated Dec. 13, 2012, 11:31 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8180/
---
(Updated Dec. 13, 2012, 11:32 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers
WRT to CentOS. Did you survey the changes required?
Would be great to have these on a wiki page for future reference and history
tracking.
DL
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: 12 December 2012 9:33 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
S
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-615:
Assignee: Rohit Yadav
> Adding a VMware Cluster in a CS setup with CS-4.0.1
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8355/#review14427
---
The attached patch doesn't apply:
git apply
~/Downloads/0001-Review
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8545/#review14428
---
Megnha,
You are making a number of changes to the command classes.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Devdeep Singh wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 9:44 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Adding support for XenServer 6.1 and Storage XenMotion
>>
>> > 2
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8237/#review14430
---
The content looks good - though we should be consistent on capitaliza
> On Dec. 13, 2012, 2:27 p.m., Chip Childers wrote:
> > Megnha,
> >
> > You are making a number of changes to the command classes. Can you please
> > provide a description of why each change is needed before we apply this
> > patch?
Chip,
The changes in the command classes are done to handle
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8566/#review14431
---
Ship it!
Committed to master, please close this review.
commit 1e74
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8566/#review14432
---
Ship it!
Committed to master, please close this review.
commit 1e74
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8567/#review14433
---
Ship it!
Committed to master. Please close this review.
commit 2ce
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8568/#review14434
---
Ship it!
Committed to master, please close this review.
commit 2cc0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers resolved CLOUDSTACK-594.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
Code committed to master branch in th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-594:
-
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> Update the java binding used to the latest
Chip, some thoughts inline.
Don't mind the pickiness.
On Dec 13, 2012, at 3:30 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start a conversation about our project bylaws. This is
> something that an Apache project doesn't absolutely require, but I
> believe that some of the larger TLP's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8553/#review14437
---
A couple of notes:
We should distinguish between DevCloud tools / sc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8180/#review14438
---
The patch applies cleanly, but it does not build. I stopped at two er
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das updated CLOUDSTACK-435:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.0.2
Affects Version/s: 4.0.0
pre-4.0.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das updated CLOUDSTACK-446:
---
Affects Version/s: pre-4.0.0
> Host going to alert state, if you are adding already a
> On Dec. 13, 2012, 3:11 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > A couple of notes:
> >
> > We should distinguish between DevCloud tools / scripts that are shipped
> > with CloudStack source, and DevCloud that's provided as a pre-made OVA by
> > community members. The DevCloud appliance is not an offi
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Chip, some thoughts inline.
>
> Don't mind the pickiness.
Thanks for the review. Any no, I don't mind the pickiness!
> On Dec 13, 2012, at 3:30 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to start a conversation about our pr
Hi Wido,
If no-one is taking ticket 451, I'll take this on. I cant assign this to myself
- so if someone with higher privileges can do that - that would be great.
I will create CentOS 6.3 based distro with latest patches. I'm a bit uncertain
on the reason behind using a 32bit system vs 64bit
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
>> Alex,
>>
>> One thing I would like us to change is the contents of the
>> "Contributed By" column. We're individuals here, and organizations
>> don't have any standing. So for example, instead of Contributed By:
>> Citrix for a particular fea
Ilya,
I just added you as a contributor, which should give you more
permissions in Jira.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Hi Wido,
>
> If no-one is taking ticket 451, I'll take this on. I cant assign this to
> myself - so if someone with higher privileges can do that -
I did.. reviewed buildsystemvm.sh script - seems self-explanatory.
There are 2 major parts to this task as I see it.
Part1
System Image Side:
We need to alter the "debootsrap" to "mock" and change debian specific configs
to redhat. Once functional - I need to create 3 versions of the templat
Yes, Chip, this is the same feature. I didn't see the requirements and so
added them and linked the JIRA tickets and requirements together.
I am not a developer of this feature and so I added the requirements in
the "Not committed to a release" page but I am proposing that this feature
be complete
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8563/#review14441
---
Ship it!
Applied in api_refactoring;
Suggestions for writing commit
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Manan Shah wrote:
> Yes, Chip, this is the same feature. I didn't see the requirements and so
> added them and linked the JIRA tickets and requirements together.
>
> I am not a developer of this feature and so I added the requirements in
> the "Not committed to a
Thanks!
If Dependency works, that'll be good.
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 3:51 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Api refactoring -- validation
Comments in-line
No silly questions at all.
We are cleaning up the API input validation logic . Goal is to clean up and do
the access check and validation logic at
API input as early as possible, not to scatter them into orchestration layer.
Thanks,
-Fang
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8237/#review14443
---
No sure about the content, but if anyone can do a doc review then I c
I like the idea of the plugin button so users can see all the plugins.
-Original Message-
From: Sonny Chhen [mailto:sonny.ch...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 4:01 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Brian Federle; Pranav Saxena
Subject: '[PROPOSAL]' Third part
One question regarding Hibernate Validator: does it support validation of
existence of a DB entity with a given ID? The reason I am raising this
question is that we have such a validation case in API refactoring. For
example, deployVMCmd has an input parameter "templateId", for this
parameter, we n
Chip,
There don't appear to have been any updates to the review since 7 Dec 2012.
What the status of getting further review?
In addition to submitting the review request, I have also opened a enhancement
ticket in JIRA [1] and created a design document in the wiki [2]. How do we go
about get
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8563/#review1
---
Oops reverted in 88b7af18e6cba787d821ff7bc079176518c212e5
- Rohit Ya
The choice of 32-bit OS may be to support legacy servers, but I really don't
know.
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: 13 December 2012 4:50 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System Offering Thread
I did.. reviewed build
Chip, looks good from my side.
I would wait for Edison to do a final review before we commit it finally.
Regards.
On 10-Dec-2012, at 10:29 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:25 AM, John Burwell wrote:
>> Chiradeep,
>>
>> Please see my responses in-line below.
>>
>> Thanks,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:16 PM, John Burwell wrote:
> Chip,
>
> There don't appear to have been any updates to the review since 7 Dec 2012.
> What the status of getting further review?
>
> In addition to submitting the review request, I have also opened a
> enhancement ticket in JIRA [1] and c
The DB validation and the API validation are both needed.
For API validation, e.g., regarding a min_max value, our goal is to make sure
the input value is in the range,
Avoid an out-of-range value being passed down and failing finally at the DB.
Thanks,
-Fang
-Original Message-
From: K
> > I actually would like to completely get rid of that table and replace it
> > with a
> link to a public filter on Jira. (note the line on 4.1 release page that
> says " 4.1
> Feature List from Jira. Please someone add a filter add the link here. ")
> The
> filter should be on the release=[
32-bit PV might have better performance than 64-bit PV on XEN,
In 64 bit mode, there are only ring 0 and ring 3, both Guest OS and guest
application are running on ring3 , application system call needs to be trapped
into hypervisor and then be injected into guest OS.
In 32 bit mode, there are ri
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>> > I actually would like to completely get rid of that table and replace it
>> > with a
>> link to a public filter on Jira. (note the line on 4.1 release page that
>> says " 4.1
>> Feature List from Jira. Please someone add a filter add the
Hi Likitha,
For the response command, I changed the entity.java to EntityMapper.java.
So the annotation @Entity changes to @EntityMapper. I found there are already
existing Entity.
IS this ok?
Thanks,
-Fang
From: Likitha Shetty [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Likitha
Shetty
Se
I updated the wiki 'Mailing List' section with a table for commonly used
prefixes. This will need some collaboration and discussion to settle down.
Please review and update. Bring back any questions to the mailing list
Open items that I think I am not clear yet.
- What is the difference betwe
Hibernate allows writing custom validators. I think in this specific use case,
database lookup for index will be expensive and it is better to throw
UncheckedException in API Implementation when the index is not found.
Here is the link to API documentation
http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/vali
Thank you Animesh. It works!
- Original Message -
From: "Animesh Chaturvedi"
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 4:03:19 PM
Subject: RE: cloud-setup-databases: How to run script when building in dev
environment
Sonny
How does administrator enable/ disable the plugin if it is misbehaving because
of bug or let's say after upgrade?
> -Original Message-
> From: Fang Wang [mailto:fang.w...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:11 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:49:49AM +0530, Alex Huang wrote:
>
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Min Chen to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer enables easier contribution to the
> pr
Animesh ,
We have a config .js file for maintaining the list of plugin ID's . We use
the plugin ID to load the plugin into the cloudstack UI . In case , a plugin
is misbehaving all one needs to do is comment out the plugin ID in the
config.js file .This would not load the plugin on to the c
Thanks for the clarification, Animesh.
On 12/13/12 10:46 AM, "Animesh Chaturvedi"
wrote:
>Hibernate allows writing custom validators. I think in this specific use
>case, database lookup for index will be expensive and it is better to
>throw UncheckedException in API Implementation when the ind
Does this require reboot of the management server?
> -Original Message-
> From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:16 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins
>
> Animesh ,
>
> We have
Manan Shah created CLOUDSTACK-621:
-
Summary: nTier Apps 2.0 Features
Key: CLOUDSTACK-621
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-621
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: New Feature
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> On 06-Dec-2012, at 9:17 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>> For writing commit messages, I think branch name may not be useful but
>>> what your commit is doing is more important maybe?
>>
>
Hi,
I would like to propose a new feature for extending the nTier Apps feature
introduced in CS 4.0. I have created a JIRA ticket and provided the
requirements at the following location. Please provide feedback on the
requirements.
JIRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK
No , the UI just needs to be refreshed . There is no need to restart management
server.
Regards,
Pranav
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:39 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: '[P
This is a silly question, Do we allow all plugins to have same access role?
OR some plugins have admin access, and some plugins for users only?
Thanks,
-Fang
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:52 AM
T
Brian Angus created CLOUDSTACK-622:
--
Summary: In the add primary storage dialog in the ui the RBD
fields don't disappear when changing from RBD to another protocol
Key: CLOUDSTACK-622
URL: https://issues.apache.o
Adding to the feature request sheet
-kd
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com]
>>>Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:44 AM
>>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>Subject: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I would like to propose a new f
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8575/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Wido den Hollander.
Description
---
Added
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13531409#comment-13531409
]
Brian Angus commented on CLOUDSTACK-622:
I have submitted a patch for review
> Advanced Search: There is a UI feature called "Advanced Search", which has a
> design document [2] listed. I'm not able to find a Jira record for it. I
> see that Brian Federle had checked this into master (noted in [3]). Brian,
> can you please create a Jira record for it?
Sure, I'll cre
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
> I updated the wiki 'Mailing List' section with a table for commonly used
> prefixes. This will need some collaboration and discussion to settle down.
> Please review and update. Bring back any questions to the mailing list
>
> Open it
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Jie Feng wrote:
>> Comments inline.
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 5:12 PM
>>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.
sebastien goasguen created CLOUDSTACK-623:
-
Summary: test, please discard
Key: CLOUDSTACK-623
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-623
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
sebastien goasguen resolved CLOUDSTACK-623.
---
Resolution: Not A Problem
> test, please discard
> --
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>
>> On 06-Dec-2012, at 9:17 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
For writing commit messages, I think branch name may not be useful b
On Dec 13, 2012, at 5:19 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>> Chip, some thoughts inline.
>>
>> Don't mind the pickiness.
>
> Thanks for the review. Any no, I don't mind the pickiness!
>
>> On Dec 13, 2012, at 3:30 AM, Chip Childers wrote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13531503#comment-13531503
]
Chip Childers commented on CLOUDSTACK-505:
--
Related commands also fixed:
mas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-381:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-343:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-1:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
Moving unresolved issues from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-425:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-559:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-410:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-382:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-364:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-387:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-390:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-4:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: pre-4.0.0)
4.1.0
> Complete installation gu
Hi all,
In looking at the list of jira records that have no fix version in
them, I realize that we probably need to start triaging them on a
semi-regular basis.
In order to ensure that the triage work doesn't require looking at the
same list over and over again, I'd like to propose that we use a
It's very hard to have a discussion here when all of the information
to be discussed is elsewhere. Please consider posting it here for the
discussion.
WRT 2.18 - Allowing an end user to assign a VLAN ID strikes me as
very undesirable. First, it allows users to have insight into the
underlying inf
Hi all,
Do we know if it should possible to create a nonoss DEB package from the
master branch at the moment?
When I try "mvn install -P vmware && dpkg-buildpackage", I get a bunch
of DEB files, but they all appear to be only around 4K in size with a
single .tar.gz of around 600M.
Regards
worksforme
Hi,
On 12/13/2012 10:15 PM, Robert Vally wrote:
Hi all,
Do we know if it should possible to create a nonoss DEB package from the
master branch at the moment?
When I try "mvn install -P vmware && dpkg-buildpackage", I get a bunch
of DEB files, but they all appear to be only around 4K in size wi
No worries.
Was just ensuring that I wasn't doing something wrong.
Thanks for the reply and enjoy the vacation :)
On 14/12/12 10:29, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
On 12/13/2012 10:15 PM, Robert Vally wrote:
Hi all,
Do we know if it should possible to create a nonoss DEB package from the
mast
+1
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 1:25 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] "Future" release record in Jira to help with triage
Hi all,
In looking at the list of jira records that have
Yes it makes sense
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 1:25 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] "Future" release record in Jira to help with triage
>
> Hi all,
>
> In looking at th
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
