Review Request: Fedora 17 openjdk 1.7 support

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6941/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- In fedora 17 package, openjd

Re: conditional build

Which command are you using? mvn install always telling me VMware-vim Pom is missing. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 5, 2012, at 11:22 PM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: > Hey Edison, > > That part is already working, please have a look at the maven-waf trunk. > > On my test system I can build rpm's f

Re: RPM build is fixed, sort of...

I just thought about how to get rid of waf, and how to package artifacts build by maven. I don't want to hack on the waf stuff, which gets easy thing done but to complicated. If war build by maven contains all the files needed by packager, then we probably just unzip the war, then call rpmbuild

Re: Review Request: CS-10219 Add option to set login attempts to portal.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6858/#review11092 --- server/src/com/cloud/user/AccountManagerImpl.java

Re: RPM build is fixed, sort of...

Hey Edison, That should be easy to do once the build is "mavenized". I'm starting to seriously dislike waf already, so would be happy to see it go. Cheers, Hugo Sent from my iPhone On 6 sep. 2012, at 10:22, "Edison Su" wrote: > I just thought about how to get rid of waf, and how to package

Re: Revived - Re: [WEBSITE][DOCS] Publican-based docs publishing?

+1 for Publican based docs website On Sep 5, 2012, at 5:56 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hi all, > > Noticed that docs.cloudstack.org is down at the moment, which reminded > me that we haven't come to a conclusion on this topic. > > The options before us are: > > - A Publican-generated site f

Re: RPM build is fixed, sort of...

On 06-Sep-2012, at 3:06 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Hey Edison, > > That should be easy to do once the build is "mavenized". I'm starting to > seriously dislike waf already, so would be happy to see it go. What technical difficulties are you facing with waf? Let's not take decision based on

marvin live tests into master

For the upcoming test phase live tests done by Marvin will be setup as per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-13 The original authors of the test code have now submitted the ASF-ICLA to the PPMC and I will be moving the tests into master over the next few days. Holler if there are ob

Re: [Discuss] VM Snapshot

On 09/05/2012 09:22 AM, Mice Xia wrote: Thanks Wido, Following two APIs are not fully implemented in java-binding and much likely to be used by vm-snapshot as far as i can tell now: 1) Domain.snapshotCreateXML(String) expect to add an arugment 'flags', specifically, '--redefine' is needed for a

ant build errors when compile awsapi

Should I move to maven build, or ant build still works? It was fine to build use ant in the morning. The recent changes seems can not pass the ant build due to missing some dependent packages, see following errors: compile-awsapi: [mkdir] Created dir: /opt/cs-apache/incubator-cloudstack/targe

RE: ant build errors when compile awsapi

Can try adding the jars from https://reviews.apache.org/r/6473/ -Original Message- From: Gavin Lee [mailto:gavin@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 3:53 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: ant build errors when compile awsapi Should I move to maven build

Re: Review Request: CS-10219 Add option to set login attempts to portal.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6858/ --- (Updated Sept. 6, 2012, 11:01 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh

Re: Review Request: CS-10219 Add option to set login attempts to portal.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6858/#review11095 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Sept. 6, 2012, 11:01 a.m., s

Re: marvin live tests into master

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > For the upcoming test phase live tests done by Marvin will be setup as > per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-13 > > The original authors of the test code have now submitted the ASF-ICLA to > the PPMC and I will be moving

Re: Automating ASL license check

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Chip, > > On 06-Sep-2012, at 12:55 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: >>> Do we need to fix/add Apache license for: >>> - text files (README, INSTALL, NOTICE etc.) >>> - configuration files >>>

Re: conditional build

Hugo, Can you give me the dummy's guide to doing an RPM build now please? If I can get a clean build from maven-waf, then I'd propose we quickly merge from that branch back to trunk, and then over to 4.0. Once it's in 4.0, I can modify the RC build script to build the source, binary and RPM vers

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-19) Request mirroring for our release and pre-release artifacts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-19?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chip Childers reassigned CLOUDSTACK-19: --- Assignee: Chip Childers > Request mirroring for our release and pre-release ar

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-19) Request mirroring for our release and pre-release artifacts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-19?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13449608#comment-13449608 ] Chip Childers commented on CLOUDSTACK-19: - Ticket opened here: https://issues.

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-15) LICENSE and NOTICE file final audits

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-15: Description: Perform a final audit of the CloudStack LICENSE and NOTICE files. See htt

Re: Automating ASL license check

On 06-Sep-2012, at 6:17 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: >> Hi Chip, >> >> On 06-Sep-2012, at 12:55 AM, Chip Childers wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Do we need to fix/add Apache license for: - text fil

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-24) Multiples IP's on Private LAN with Nat 1:1

Facundo Guerrero created CLOUDSTACK-24: -- Summary: Multiples IP's on Private LAN with Nat 1:1 Key: CLOUDSTACK-24 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24 Project: CloudStack

Introducing some new developers to the community

Hi all, I wanted to drop a note to the list to introduce some new developers that SunGard Availability Services will be sponsoring to help on the project. We have 6 software developers, and one infrastructure architect, that you'll start to see participating on the list this month (and hopefully

Re: maven install failed

On 09/05/2012 07:14 PM, Edison Su wrote: Check out the lastest master code, cd deps, then "mvn install" will work. I've tried the same for building the Debian packages, but I keep running into ws.zones.apache.org which is down. What I've seen: INFO] snapshot org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-a

Re: maven install failed

Wido - Just remind me. libvirt-java 0.4.8 is the version with the compatible license now, right? Which license is it now? Thanks! On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > On 09/05/2012 07:14 PM, Edison Su wrote: >> >> Check out the lastest master code, cd deps, then "mvn in

Re: maven install failed

On 09/06/2012 04:36 PM, Chip Childers wrote: Wido - Just remind me. libvirt-java 0.4.8 is the version with the compatible license now, right? Which license is it now? 0.4.8 is still LGPL, but 0.4.9 will be MIT. We however have an exception for libvirt-java: https://issues.apache.org/jira/b

Re: maven install failed

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > On 09/06/2012 04:36 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >> >> Wido - Just remind me. libvirt-java 0.4.8 is the version with the >> compatible license now, right? Which license is it now? >> > > 0.4.8 is still LGPL, but 0.4.9 will be MIT. > > We h

Re: Introducing some new developers to the community

On 06-Sep-2012, at 7:57 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > I wanted to drop a note to the list to introduce some new developers > that SunGard Availability Services will be sponsoring to help on the > project. We have 6 software developers, and one infrastructure > architect, that you'll s

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-11) Not able to install ASF 4.0 on Rhel 6.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-11?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13449723#comment-13449723 ] Sudha Ponnaganti commented on CLOUDSTACK-11: Hi Edison, jakarta-taglibs-st

Re: Review Request: Add initial support for Caringo's CAStor object storage as the S3 backend.

Hey all, Can I ask a favor, which is to not edit the NOTICE and LICENSE files directly? I'm trying to keep things structured within the tools/whisker/descriptor.xml file, so that the LICENSE and NOTICE are generated from that structured data. I'll take a look at the change in the commit, and int

Re: Review Request: Add initial support for Caringo's CAStor object storage as the S3 backend.

And actually, after looking at the commit, the licensing statement actually belongs in the LICENSE file and not the NOTICE file. On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hey all, > > Can I ask a favor, which is to not edit the NOTICE and LICENSE files directly? > > I'm trying to ke

Re: ant build errors when compile awsapi

Yes, that's a new dependency added in the maven build. I think you can download the needed jar's directly from maven central and put them in deps/awsapi-lib/, if you're still using ant: http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=com/caringo/client/CAStorSDK/1.3.1-CS40/CAStorSDK-1.3.1-CS40.jar

Re: RPM build is fixed, sort of...

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > On 06-Sep-2012, at 3:06 PM, Hugo Trippaers > wrote: > >> Hey Edison, >> >> That should be easy to do once the build is "mavenized". I'm starting to >> seriously dislike waf already, so would be happy to see it go. > > What technical difficu

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-25) Allow Virtual Load Balancer with basic zone

Caleb Call created CLOUDSTACK-25: Summary: Allow Virtual Load Balancer with basic zone Key: CLOUDSTACK-25 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-25 Project: CloudStack Issue Ty

Re: marvin live tests into master

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > For the upcoming test phase live tests done by Marvin will be setup as > per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-13 > > The original authors of the test code have now submitted the ASF-ICLA to > the PPMC and I will be moving

RE: conditional build

Chip, The instructions on https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Building+with+Maven should be accurate. Please note that you have to specifiy a prerelease name on the waf commandline. First make sure the dependencies are alright, then run the waf command under the "Building R

RE: conditional build

I did not check if we need vmware-base for anything. If we can move that to the non-oss list we don't need any of the jars. Cheers, Hugo > -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 5:54 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apach

Re: conditional build

Is downloading the VMware jars a must? The build should work, without downloading these deps, for an OSS build. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 6, 2012, at 8:49 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: > Chip, > > The instructions on > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Building+with+Mave

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-26) Jars still present in the what would be RC1

David Nalley created CLOUDSTACK-26: -- Summary: Jars still present in the what would be RC1 Key: CLOUDSTACK-26 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-26 Project: CloudStack Issu

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-27) JARs are still present in the tools directory

David Nalley created CLOUDSTACK-27: -- Summary: JARs are still present in the tools directory Key: CLOUDSTACK-27 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-27 Project: CloudStack Is

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-28) wget.exe (GPLed) is present in the tools directory as a binary.

David Nalley created CLOUDSTACK-28: -- Summary: wget.exe (GPLed) is present in the tools directory as a binary. Key: CLOUDSTACK-28 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-28 Project: Clo

Re: Review Request: Add initial support for Caringo's CAStor object storage as the S3 backend.

Sorry about that. I should have been more careful. On 9/6/12 8:37 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >And actually, after looking at the commit, the licensing statement >actually belongs in the LICENSE file and not the NOTICE file. > >On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Chip Childers > wrote: >> Hey all, >

Re: Review Request: Add initial support for Caringo's CAStor object storage as the S3 backend.

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Sorry about that. I should have been more careful. No worries! It's fixed in master. > On 9/6/12 8:37 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >>And actually, after looking at the commit, the licensing statement >>actually belongs in the LICENSE f

RE: maven install failed

Confirmed, ant build works in latest build. Thanks for fixing this Anthony > -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 5:47 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: maven install failed > > It's fixed on

[DISCUSS] how about components.xml

Hey, While testing the my fresh RPMs I ran into some trouble starting the management server. The components.xml.in file references the elements and classes for components that we put on the nonoss list. So they might not be available after installation and should not be used by default I think.

Re: Review Request: maven kvm hypervisor plugin build without -Dnonoss

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6925/#review11105 --- Fixed by Wido in the maven-waf branch. Thanks for the patch :-) - H

Re: Review Request: Fedora 17 openjdk 1.7 support

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6941/#review11106 --- Is it alright if i come back to this a little later? The current rele

RE: [DISCUSS] how about components.xml

We can always put out a OSS components.xml and a full components.xml. components.xmls can inherit from each other so the full componetns.xml won't have to redefine everything just the things that changed. The user can specify which one to use via an environment variable, "cloud-stack-compone

Re: [DISCUSS] how about components.xml

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > We can always put out a OSS components.xml and a full components.xml. > components.xmls can inherit from each other so the full componetns.xml won't > have to redefine everything just the things that changed. > > The user can specify which one

RE: [DISCUSS] how about components.xml

CloudStack automatically looks for components.xml in the classpath if the property is not defined. So we can put out the OSS version, it will be the default. We just need a way for people to download the full (non compliant) version and give instructions on how to set the property. --Alex

Re: [DISCUSS] how about components.xml

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > We can always put out a OSS components.xml and a full components.xml. > components.xmls can inherit from each other so the full componetns.xml won't > have to redefine everything just the things that changed. > > The user can specify which one

Re: [DISCUSS] how about components.xml

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > CloudStack automatically looks for components.xml in the classpath if the > property is not defined. So we can put out the OSS version, it will be the > default. > > We just need a way for people to download the full (non compliant) version >

Re: Review Request: Fedora 17 openjdk 1.7 support

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6941/#review11107 --- I don't see a problem with this specific change - the if statement is

RE: [DISCUSS] how about components.xml

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 10:14 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] how about components.xml > > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > > We can always put out a OS

Re: RPM build is fixed, sort of...

So, the RPMs build fine for me with the current 4.0 tree, but installing them and trying to use them, it seems something was missed, getting a 500 on the client: The absolute uri: http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core cannot be resolved in either web.xml or the jar files deployed with this application

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-29) IPTables included in the source tree

David Nalley created CLOUDSTACK-29: -- Summary: IPTables included in the source tree Key: CLOUDSTACK-29 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-29 Project: CloudStack Issue Type:

Re: RPM build is fixed, sort of...

nevermind, just bitten by the stuff not being included anymore and had to install a few more dependencies. On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > So, the RPMs build fine for me with the current 4.0 tree, but > installing them and trying to use them, it seems something was misse

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-30) vhd-util binary

David Nalley created CLOUDSTACK-30: -- Summary: vhd-util binary Key: CLOUDSTACK-30 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-30 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Compon

RE: [DISCUSS] how about components.xml

> -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 7:20 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] how about components.xml > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa

RE: RPM build is fixed, sort of...

Yeah, need to install jakarta-taglibs-standard, I think I added it in the rpm dependence, but seems not got installed automatically. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 10:31 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apach

RE: [DISCUSS] how about components.xml

I just did on the master branch(7a588b0bdcfef5e125aecdcfbded72af5735f954) yesterday. > -Original Message- > From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 10:02 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] how about co

RE: conditional build

Yah, vmware-base can be moved to no-oss. > -Original Message- > From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 9:00 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: conditional build > > I did not check if we need vmware-base fo

Can we combine the work going on for builds in master and maven-waf?

Can we combine the work going on for builds in master and maven-waf? At this point, I'm personally confused about which branch (master of maven-waf) is the one that we are all looking at to stabilize the build. Should we pick one? -chip

RE: Introducing some new developers to the community

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 7:27 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Introducing some new developers to the community > > Hi all, > > I wanted to drop a note to the list to introdu

Re: Review Request: maven kvm hypervisor plugin build without -Dnonoss

Trying to get a working RPM build of 4.0 going... I assume my latest issue is related to this. "class not found: com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource", if someone is building RPMs isn't it safe to assume they want the kvm/libvirt pieces? What was Wido's fix? I don't see this

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-31) xt_checksum kernel object (binary and license problems) is present in source tree

David Nalley created CLOUDSTACK-31: -- Summary: xt_checksum kernel object (binary and license problems) is present in source tree Key: CLOUDSTACK-31 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-31

RE: Can we combine the work going on for builds in master and maven-waf?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 11:03 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Can we combine the work going on for builds in master and maven- > waf? > > Can we combine the work going on fo

RE: Review Request: maven kvm hypervisor plugin build without -Dnonoss

Yah, yesterday, I thought kVM is illegal to be included in the OSS release, so I removed it from cloud.spec. I'll add it back. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 11:05 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-31) xt_checksum kernel object (binary and license problems) is present in source tree

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-31?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su closed CLOUDSTACK-31. --- Resolution: Fixed Fixed in 3db9736a0754388d782b45d31e8e36c9966c508e > xt_checksum

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-29) IPTables included in the source tree

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-29?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su closed CLOUDSTACK-29. --- Resolution: Fixed Fixed in 3db9736a0754388d782b45d31e8e36c9966c508e > IPTables in

Re: Can we combine the work going on for builds in master and maven-waf?

Alex - Gotcha. I'll start testing the build in master for now, and will wait to do it in 4.0. Edison - I've got things ready to create the RC for source, but was waiting for the build to be sorted before dealing with the binary portion. I have a clean CentOS VM ready to build the OSS RPMs. On Th

[ASFCS40] RE: 4.0 release items

Thanks Ewan! I will do a first level triage on this and the review board and assign them to people. Please add yourself to the new Jira if you have not yet. I will use pre-4.0 as the target for anything that is required in the 4.0 release. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Ewan Mel

Re: Review Request: Fedora 17 openjdk 1.7 support

> On Sept. 6, 2012, 5:16 p.m., David Nalley wrote: > > I don't see a problem with this specific change - the if statement is > > pretty limited and leaves things alone for everything that isn't f17 or > > later. Hugo: Any objection if I commit this? > > > > The statement is ok, but Edison an

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-32) Resolve licensing question for configuration files stored in the patches folder

Chip Childers created CLOUDSTACK-32: --- Summary: Resolve licensing question for configuration files stored in the patches folder Key: CLOUDSTACK-32 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-32

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-32) Resolve licensing question for configuration files stored in the patches folder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-32: Description: There is an ongoing thread on legal-discuss@a.o, but this needs to be resol

[ASFCS40] Configuration file licensing followup

Chiradeep, Would you mind putting together the specific example data being requested by Daniel [1] on legal-discuss@a.o in response to the legal Jira that you raised [2]? The legal thread includes some discussion on the possibility of config files even being something that could enjoy license pro

RE: Review Request: Fedora 17 openjdk 1.7 support

> -Original Message- > From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of > Hugo Trippaers > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 11:24 AM > To: cloudstack; David Nalley; Hiroaki Kawai; Hugo Trippaers > Subject: Re: Review Request: Fedora 17 openjdk 1.7 support > > > >

RE: Review Request: maven kvm hypervisor plugin build without -Dnonoss

The rpm build on master branch is fixed, KVM is included. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 11:05 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Hugo Trippaers > Cc: Hiroaki Kawai > Subject: Re: Review Request: mav

Re: Review Request: CS-10219 Add option to set login attempts to portal.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6858/#review9 --- server/src/com/cloud/user/AccountManagerImpl.java

[ASFCS40] Specifically what should be our "binary distribution"?

Hi all, Looking at previous CloudStack releases on sourceforge, I see that the "binary" distributions are tar.gz rpm/deb packages for RHEL and Ubuntu. I've looked at other Apache projects, and I see that they usually include the built jar files as their "binary" release artifacts. So my question

IRC Meeting Times

Hi all, Last week, Wido raised a good point - that Friday 19:00UTC was not working out for folks in Europe, as "that's normally the time when you start to attend to your social life." He proposed moving the meetings to Wednesdays or Thursdays, and at 21:00UTC instead. (That'd be 2 p.m. Pacific,

Re: Review Request: CS-10219 Add option to set login attempts to portal.

> On Sept. 6, 2012, 7:04 p.m., Koushik Das wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/user/AccountManagerImpl.java, line 1879 > > > > > > Once the user account gets locked, what are the options to unlock. I > > don't see any pro

Re: [ASFCS40] Specifically what should be our "binary distribution"?

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012, at 02:19 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > Looking at previous CloudStack releases on sourceforge, I see that the > "binary" distributions are tar.gz rpm/deb packages for RHEL and > Ubuntu. I've looked at other Apache projects, and I see that they > usually include the b

Re: [ASFCS40] Specifically what should be our "binary distribution"?

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012, at 02:19 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Looking at previous CloudStack releases on sourceforge, I see that the >> "binary" distributions are tar.gz rpm/deb packages for RHEL and >> Ubuntu. I've looked at other

Re: IRC Meeting Times

On 09/06/2012 03:34 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: Hi all, Last week, Wido raised a good point - that Friday 19:00UTC was not working out for folks in Europe, as "that's normally the time when you start to attend to your social life." He proposed moving the meetings to Wednesdays or Thursdays, and at

Re: Review Request: maven kvm hypervisor plugin build without -Dnonoss

On 09/06/2012 08:05 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: Trying to get a working RPM build of 4.0 going... I assume my latest issue is related to this. "class not found: com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource", if someone is building RPMs isn't it safe to assume they want the kvm/lib

Re: [ASFCS40] Specifically what should be our "binary distribution"?

On 09/06/2012 09:56 PM, Chip Childers wrote: On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: On Thu, Sep 6, 2012, at 02:19 PM, Chip Childers wrote: Hi all, Looking at previous CloudStack releases on sourceforge, I see that the "binary" distributions are tar.gz rpm/deb packages for RHE

RE: IRC Meeting Times

> -Original Message- > From: Robert Schweikert [mailto:rjsch...@suse.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 1:00 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: IRC Meeting Times > > On 09/06/2012 03:34 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Last week, Wido raised a

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-16) Final release version number changes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-16?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Huang updated CLOUDSTACK-16: - Fix Version/s: pre-4.0.0 > Final release version number changes >

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-16) Final release version number changes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-16?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Huang updated CLOUDSTACK-16: - Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0) > Final release version number changes > -

Re: [ASFCS40] Specifically what should be our "binary distribution"?

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 09/06/2012 09:56 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012, at 02:19 PM, Chip Childers wrote: Hi all, Looking at previous CloudStack releas

Re: [ASFCS40] Specifically what should be our "binary distribution"?

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012, at 03:46 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > I'll be setting up a Debian/Ubuntu repository soon for at the Debian > packages. Hi Wido Have you looked into doing this through the oBS? Robert has offered assistance in walking through this. Thanks, Joe -- Joe Brockmeier j...@z

Re: Review Request: Make xen.check.hvm a proper parameter

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5655/#review11135 --- It shouldn't use the hardcoded string but the Config.XenCheckHvm. Pl

Re: RPM build is fixed, sort of...

Ok. Perhaps this is not the place, but I'm a little tripped up due to my lack of java experience. These new RPM builds from 4.0 also seem to have changed the logging, the server is going to /var/log/cloud/management/catalina.out instead of the old /var/log/cloud/management/management-server.log, an

Re: IRC Meeting Times

On 09/06/2012 09:34 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: Hi all, Last week, Wido raised a good point - that Friday 19:00UTC was not working out for folks in Europe, as "that's normally the time when you start to attend to your social life." He proposed moving the meetings to Wednesdays or Thursdays, and

RE: [ASFCS40] Specifically what should be our "binary distribution"?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 1:56 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ASFCS40] Specifically what should be our "binary > distribution"? > > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Wido

RE: RPM build is fixed, sort of...

Yah, I noticed this issue in QA's environment yesterday. I'll take a look at it. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 2:20 PM > To: Edison Su > Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: RPM build is fixe

Re: IRC Meeting Times

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012, at 04:21 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > The reason I'm opting for 21:00 UTC is that it's after dinner. That's totally reasonable... but 21:00 UTC is 17:00 for folks on Eastern time in the U.S., which is usually the end of the work day for folks who actually clock out at 5. (A

RE: Can we combine the work going on for builds in master and maven-waf?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 11:21 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Can we combine the work going on for builds in master and > maven-waf? > > Alex - Gotcha. I'll start testin

Re: Review Request: maven kvm hypervisor plugin build without -Dnonoss

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 09/06/2012 08:05 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: >> >> Trying to get a working RPM build of 4.0 going... I assume my latest >> issue is related to this. "class not found: >> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource",

Re: IRC Meeting Times

Hi all Regardless the time to be used I believe it is better use something like Doodle, which I used in other Apache project communities and worked well for us. [1] http://doodle.com/ On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012, at 04:21 PM, Wido den Hollande

  1   2   >