Yeah, need to install jakarta-taglibs-standard, I think I added it in the rpm 
dependence, but seems not got installed automatically.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 10:31 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Edison Su
> Subject: Re: RPM build is fixed, sort of...
> 
> nevermind, just bitten by the stuff not being included anymore and had
> to install a few more dependencies.
> 
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Marcus Sorensen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > So, the RPMs build fine for me with the current 4.0 tree, but
> > installing them and trying to use them, it seems something was missed,
> > getting a 500 on the client:
> >
> > The absolute uri: http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core cannot be
> resolved
> > in either web.xml or the jar files deployed with this application
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, David Nalley <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Rohit Yadav <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 06-Sep-2012, at 3:06 PM, Hugo Trippaers
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hey Edison,
> >>>>
> >>>> That should be easy to do once the build is "mavenized". I'm
> starting to seriously dislike waf already, so would be happy to see it
> go.
> >>>
> >>> What technical difficulties are you facing with waf? Let's not take
> decision based on one's preference.
> >>>
> >>> If we decide to get rid of war, then I can try to write cmake based
> packaging scripts that package debs and rpm.
> >>> (I package/release debs/rpm for VideoLAN's VLMC,
> https://github.com/bhaisaab/cmakeqt)
> >>>
> >>> Rohit
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> So I personally don't see why maven + rpmbuild or maven + dpkg
> >> couldn't be enough for packaging.
> >> Don't we really want people to be able to install CloudStack using
> >> maven? Certainly from a developer standpoint I think that is an end
> >> goal. Aside from the fact that it exists, I don't see anything that
> >> waf currently does that maven can't do.
> >>
> >> --David

Reply via email to