> On Sept. 6, 2012, 5:16 p.m., David Nalley wrote: > > I don't see a problem with this specific change - the if statement is > > pretty limited and leaves things alone for everything that isn't f17 or > > later. Hugo: Any objection if I commit this? > > > >
The statement is ok, but Edison and myself are doing a lot of conflicting commits on cloud.spec already. I'm afraid it gets lots if we are not carefull. By leaving this open using we have solved the maven/ant thing we can be sure it gets in the build. Or just commit it to both the maven-waf and master branch - Hugo ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6941/#review11107 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Sept. 6, 2012, 7:17 a.m., Hiroaki Kawai wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/6941/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 6, 2012, 7:17 a.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack. > > > Description > ------- > > In fedora 17 package, openjdk 1.6 package was marked as deprecated, and only > openjdk 1.7 is available for general. > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/java-1.6.0-openjdk > > > Diffs > ----- > > cloud.spec b22bd8c > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6941/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > mvn && mvn test > > > Thanks, > > Hiroaki Kawai > >
