Re: [Discuss] CloudStack architecture to a loosely-coupled component oriented distributed architecture

Sent from my iPhone On Aug 19, 2012, at 10:29 PM, "Murali Reddy" wrote: > On 16/08/12 11:27 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote: > >> >> On 8/15/12 10:57 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote: >> >> >>> >>> I don't think Murali and Kelven's proposals are related. Murali's is a >>> notification system so that som

Re: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0

Nice stuff. (note you can have Apache pom as parent to inherit some stuff and reduce pom size) In an other incubating project depending on jars not in maven central, we have setup a m2 repo in apache-extras (see http://svn.codespot.com/a/apache-extras.org/kalumet-extras/) -- Olivier 2012/8/19 Da

Re: createIpForwardingRule and createFirewallRule

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 01:48:22PM -0400, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > On 8/17/12 3:57 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" > wrote: > > >When doing static NAT cloudstack used to createIpForwardingRule on the > >acquired IP on a port range to forward traffic to the VM guest. > > > >Now CS uses createFirewallRu

RE: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0

Hey Darren, Good stuff, works like a charm. Following recent mails I believe we pretty much have a consensus on using maven, so I think we can move ahead with this. Depending on the release schedule we can or can't include it in 4.0, but that's no show stopper for anybody. Anything I can do

Domr and Network

Hi, A domr is checked for its existence and if it does not exist it is created whenever an instance is launched. If I stop or stop and delete the domr, HA won't recreate domr. Is it intentional or a bug? Further, when I restart the network after either stopping the domr or stopping and deletin

Re: Review Request: Plugin for enabling Brocade as external load balancing service provider in CloudStack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6492/#review10534 --- plugins/network-elements/brocade/src/com/cloud/network/element/Broca

RE: DB upgrade to 4.0 version

Hey Alena, I did some checking and unfortunately I can't reproduce your issue. I started with a fresh 3.0.2 installation using the create_schema.sql. I get only one entry in the resulting list. Can you show me the schema only dump of the database (or only of the table physical_network_service_p

Re: Review Request: Support for local data disk feature. (CS-14277)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6431/ --- (Updated Aug. 20, 2012, 11:54 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pr

Re: Review Request: Support for local data disk feature. (CS-14277)

> On Aug. 12, 2012, 8:46 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > Its best to get another pair of eyes to review the change as well. > > I have one more question which was asked in another thread but let me reask > > - "if the end user chooses HA service offering and local storage disk > > offering would t

[ASFCS40] Re: Re: Relicensing XS Java bindings for CloudStack

Fantastic! Can someone (perhaps one of the Citrix core team members) please volunteer to get this new API integrated? This resolves a pretty important 4.0 release blocker... -chip On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Ewan Mellor wrote: > The XenServer team have re-licensed their SDK as promised.

Review Request: CS-15734 KVM Snapshots show incorrect disk usage.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6699/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Nitin Mehta and edison su. Description --- C

RE: [Discuss] CloudStack architecture to a loosely-coupled component oriented distributed architecture

> > http://www.cloudscaling.com/blog/cloud-computing/simplicity-scales-an- > alternative-approach-to-openstack-nova-rpc-messaging/ > > Zeromq seems good. > > I like 0mq as well but it's LGPL. I've been reading up on the whole apache compatibility license thing and there doesn't seem to be a wa

Re: [Discuss] CloudStack architecture to a loosely-coupled component oriented distributed architecture

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Alex Huang wrote: >> >> http://www.cloudscaling.com/blog/cloud-computing/simplicity-scales-an- >> alternative-approach-to-openstack-nova-rpc-messaging/ >> >> Zeromq seems good. >> > > > I like 0mq as well but it's LGPL. I've been reading up on the whole apache >

Re: FW: [WEBSITE][DOCS] Publican-based docs publishing?

My 2 cents - I'd like the doc build results to live within the apache site for CloudStack. My rationale is that I'd like as much of the infra to be ASF hosted, and I'd like the release process to include pushing the docs into the a.o site. -chip

RE: [ASFCS40] Re: Re: Relicensing XS Java bindings for CloudStack

Abhi, Can you get someone to work on this? It's mostly a build job dependency. I doubt the API itself changed very much. Thanks. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 6:23 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator

Re: Re: Relicensing XS Java bindings for CloudStack

This is indeed good news, another release blocker removed (or at least now addressable) --David

RE: [ASFCS40] Re: Re: Relicensing XS Java bindings for CloudStack

Alex, Devdeep is currently doing a sanity check with the supplied Xenserver Java SDK. There are some changes on CS side. Will request him to update the thread with the changes, before updating it in master for review and feedback. -abhi >-Original Message- >From: Alex Huang >Sent: Mo

Re: createIpForwardingRule and createFirewallRule

On 8/20/12 1:23 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 01:48:22PM -0400, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >> On 8/17/12 3:57 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" >> wrote: >> >> >When doing static NAT cloudstack used to createIpForwardingRule on the >> >acquired IP on a port range to forward traf

RE: [ASFCS40] Re: Re: Relicensing XS Java bindings for CloudStack

Does this XenServer SDK release include whatever was manually patched in CS? I believe something regarding the connection timeouts was patched in Xapi. Darren > Original Message > Subject: RE: [ASFCS40] Re: Re: Relicensing XS Java bindings for > CloudStack > From: Abhinandan

[ASFCS40] Help needed to resolve the mysql-connector blocker issue

I need some help from the build / packaging folks on the list. We need to remove cloud-mysql-connector-java-5.1.7-bin.jar from our source tree, and I'm pretty certain that we're NOT going to be able to distribute it in the binary builds. I did a bit of research in the legal-discuss@a.o archives [

Re: [ASFCS40] Help needed to resolve the mysql-connector blocker issue

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > I need some help from the build / packaging folks on the list. > > We need to remove cloud-mysql-connector-java-5.1.7-bin.jar from our > source tree, and I'm pretty certain that we're NOT going to be able to > distribute it in the binary bui

RE: [Discuss] CloudStack architecture to a loosely-coupled component oriented distributed architecture

> Original Message > Subject: Re: [Discuss] CloudStack architecture to a loosely-coupled > component oriented distributed architecture > From: Chip Childers > Date: Mon, August 20, 2012 6:55 am > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:53 AM

RE: [Discuss] CloudStack architecture to a loosely-coupled component oriented distributed architecture

Murali, This is just a random implementation note. Beware of DB transactions and events. Events shouldn't be sent until DB transactions are committed. If you don't give consideration to this upfront, you suddenly have craziness ensuing or one creates an overly complex system to tie DB transacti

RE: [ASFCS40] Help needed to resolve the mysql-connector blocker issue

> > > > First, we make the mysql-connector-java.jar file a build dependency > > that gets downloaded by the developer. Second, we do NOT distribute > > this JAR in a binary release artifact hosted at ASF. Third, we > > document it as a system dependency, and update the reference deb/spec > > file

RE: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0

Cool thanks, I'll looking using the Apache parent pom and the apache-extras. Darren > Original Message > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0 > From: Olivier Lamy > Date: Mon, August 20, 2012 12:47 am > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org

RE: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0

I'm good at the moment, just chugging through all the minute details. I'll submit a patch for inclusion of all the pom files so that everyone can get it on master. Then I'll start working on how to get the existing rpm/deb builds to use maven to pull the deps. Darren > Original Mess

Re: [ASFCS40] Help needed to resolve the mysql-connector blocker issue

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Alex Huang wrote: >> > >> > First, we make the mysql-connector-java.jar file a build dependency >> > that gets downloaded by the developer. Second, we do NOT distribute >> > this JAR in a binary release artifact hosted at ASF. Third, we >> > document it as a syst

Re: [ASFCS40] Help needed to resolve the mysql-connector blocker issue

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Alex Huang wrote: >>> > >>> > First, we make the mysql-connector-java.jar file a build dependency >>> > that gets downloaded by the developer. Second, we do NOT distribute >>> > this JAR in a binary release

[ASFCS40] take a branch closer to actual release...

Hi guys, There's about 20 checkins since the last merge. With the release pushed back, I'm thinking we should push the actual branch back close to the actual release freeze date. I'll pick back up the merges when that happens. Any yeahs or nays? Thanks. --Alex

Re: [WEBSITE][DOCS] Publican-based docs publishing?

Jessica Tomechak wrote: I'd propose that we at least look into what it would take to write the auto-upload script with the mindtouch API. Radhika and I have already given much thought to the requirements. Is there someone with programming experience on this list who'd be willing to volunteer to

Re: [Discuss] CloudStack architecture to a loosely-coupled component oriented distributed architecture

Murali, The key point is the shifting to event-driven programming model itself at orchestration layer, the underlying facility is currently not at critical path, we will need to do a messaging arbitration here so that we can plugin a suitable MQ selection in a fairly easy step. One thing I'm sure

Review Request: Major Update/Overhaul of Apache CloudStack site

I've been working on getting the Website up to snuff and porting over some of the content from the old CloudStack.org site. This is by no means done, but gives a better working copy... A copy of this can be seen here: http://dissociatedpress.net/cloudstack/ Note that I based a lot of this on the

Re: Review Request: CS-15734 KVM Snapshots show incorrect disk usage.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6699/#review10543 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On Aug. 20, 2012, 1:44 p.m., saksha

Re: git commit: add recreate.systemvm.enabled parameter to control recreating systemvm

Why is this set to false by default? >From an design decision point of view, not doing so, encourages thinking of sysVMs as more stateful than they are IMO. --David On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:19 PM, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master ba2b0c397 -> 481aae1eb > > > add recreate.system

RE: XenServer inode exhaustion

This just happened to me, only it happened to the pool master and one of the slaves. Does anybody have any insight/ideas on this. Matthew, how were you able to fix this? -Original Message- From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartm...@tls.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 9:03 AM To: CloudS

Re: [ASFCS40] take a branch closer to actual release...

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Hi guys, > > There's about 20 checkins since the last merge. With the release pushed > back, I'm thinking we should push the actual branch back close to the actual > release freeze date. I'll pick back up the merges when that happens. Any

Re: [ASFCS40] take a branch closer to actual release...

+1 On 8/20/12 11:52 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Alex Huang wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> There's about 20 checkins since the last merge. With the release >>pushed back, I'm thinking we should push the actual branch back close to >>the actual release freeze date. I'

Re: Review Request: errorchecking for basebox build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6654/#review10546 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chip Childers On Aug. 16, 2012, 2:02 p.m., Ad

Re: Review Request: errorchecking for basebox build

Adam, This was applied. Thanks! Please go back into the review, and close it as "submitted". -chip On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/6654/ > > Ship it! > > Ship It! > > > - Chi

Re: FW: [DOCS] Cloudbridge needs new documentation

Sebastien, Great, thanks for volunteering to move that content. I've added you to the fixit signup sheet: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Convert+Installation+Guide+to+Docbook+XML Jessica T. CloudStack Tech Pubs > -Original Message- > From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@g

RE: XenServer inode exhaustion

Hi, Try removing /etc/udev/rules.d/xen-ovs-vif-flows.rules and socket files under /tmp in XenServer Host. Anthony > -Original Message- > From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cwe...@iswest.net] > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 11:31 AM > To: 'CloudStack Devs'; 'CloudStack user/admin discussions' >

Re: Review Request: Support for local data disk feature. (CS-14277)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6431/#review10544 --- server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java

RE: git commit: add recreate.systemvm.enabled parameter to control recreating systemvm

No preference, setting to false, so it has the same behavior as before. > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 11:27 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: git commit: add recreate.systemvm.enabled parameter to

Re: Review Request: Major Update/Overhaul of Apache CloudStack site

On 08/20/2012 08:03 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: I've been working on getting the Website up to snuff and porting over some of the content from the old CloudStack.org site. This is by no means done, but gives a better working copy... A copy of this can be seen here: http://dissociatedpress.net/c

Re: guide in .doc

I have attached the most recent Installation Guide to the XML conversion signup sheet. This is a Citrix CloudPlatform guide. Since Citrix has made a release more recently than Apache, it contains fixes that should apply to Apache CloudStack 4.0. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTA

Re: [Discuss] CloudStack architecture to a loosely-coupled component oriented distributed architecture

Some clarifications after discussion with Alex, >One thing I'm sure >is that we won't use two separated MQ solutions in one system. This applies only to the MQ service employed internally by CloudStack, if there are external systems that rely on other MQ services, we should be able to put integra

Re: AutoScale comments.....(WAS:RE: where features are developed was: Review Request: Merge Kelven's VPC code for Vmware into asf vpc branch)

You can look at the autoscale thread here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201207.mb ox/thread On 8/16/12 10:43 AM, "Vijay Venkatachalam" wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chiradeep Vittal >> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:42 PM >> To: CloudS

Re: Ideas for virtual Redundant Router

On 8/16/12 2:41 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >Hi, > >At present the redundancy of the virtual redundant routers, VRRP [3], >operates outside the scope of CloudStack [2]. And any event that happens >outside of CS, like rebooting by ssh-ing into the router vms or a >crash/start, is not know by the ma

Re: Domr and Network

On 8/20/12 2:34 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >Hi, > >A domr is checked for its existence and if it does not exist it is >created whenever an instance is launched. If I stop or stop and delete >the domr, HA won't recreate domr. Is it intentional or a bug? Are you doing this from the API? If you are

Re: Review Request: Plugin for enabling Brocade as external load balancing service provider in CloudStack

There should be an FS + User guide (so that docs can indicate how to use this) On 8/17/12 6:31 AM, "Murali Reddy" wrote: >On 15/08/12 3:00 AM, "Krishna Sadasivam" wrote: > >>I have submitted a new clean patch. >> >>Thanks, >>Krishna > >I will review the patch over the week end. Please get the l

Re: guide in .doc

On 08/20/2012 11:05 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: I have attached the most recent Installation Guide to the XML conversion signup sheet. This is a Citrix CloudPlatform guide. Since Citrix has made a release more recently than Apache, it contains fixes that should apply to Apache CloudStack 4.0.

Re: Review Request: Major Update/Overhaul of Apache CloudStack site

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 08/20/2012 08:03 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> >> I've been working on getting the Website up to snuff and porting over >> some of the content from the old CloudStack.org site. This is by no >> means done, but gives a better workin

Re: [ASFCS40] [DISCUSS] System VM strategy

On 8/14/12 10:33 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: > > >On 8/14/12 6:20 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >>I'm trying to kick off conversation with this thread... >> >>I know that people have been looking at the System VM licensing and >>distribution issues from various angles, but I'm not sure we cam

Re: Review Request: Major Update/Overhaul of Apache CloudStack site

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:03:36PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: > It seems like the site is in Subversion somewhere? Is this going to > be publicly available? Or am I missing something. It's in SVN, yes: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cloudstack/site/ But I'm not a committer, so

Re: Review Request: Major Update/Overhaul of Apache CloudStack site

On 08/20/2012 11:32 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:03:36PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: It seems like the site is in Subversion somewhere? Is this going to be publicly available? Or am I missing something. It's in SVN, yes: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubato

Re: [ASFCS40] [DISCUSS] System VM strategy

On 08/20/2012 11:32 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: On 8/14/12 10:33 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: On 8/14/12 6:20 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: I'm trying to kick off conversation with this thread... I know that people have been looking at the System VM licensing and distribution issues fr

Re: [ASFCS40] [DISCUSS] System VM strategy

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 08/20/2012 11:32 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >> >> >> >> On 8/14/12 10:33 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 8/14/12 6:20 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >>> I'm trying to kick off conversation with this thread..

Re: [ASFCS40] [DISCUSS] System VM strategy

On 8/20/12 2:55 PM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: > > >On 08/20/2012 11:32 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >> >> >> On 8/14/12 10:33 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 8/14/12 6:20 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >>> I'm trying to kick off conversation with this thread...

Re: [ASFCS40] [DISCUSS] System VM strategy

On 08/21/2012 12:03 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: On 8/20/12 2:55 PM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: On 08/20/2012 11:32 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: On 8/14/12 10:33 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: On 8/14/12 6:20 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: I'm trying to kick off conversation with th

Re: [Events] Free Passes to LInuxCon/CloudOpen

Mark Cloudsoft also has a few free passes (first come first served) to CloudOpen. Best Duncan On 15 August 2012 21:26, Hinkle Mark R. wrote: > I think I'll have some free passes to the Linux Foundation's LinuxCon > North America and the Cloud Open Conference this month on August 29th > throug

Re: Review Request: Major Update/Overhaul of Apache CloudStack site

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:44:17PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: > What I meant is that the current CloudStack in my website is to > crowded with way to much information. Gotcha. I hope that this design is easier to navigate and will be easier to find information on. > internally to their man

Re: Review Request: Major Update/Overhaul of Apache CloudStack site

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > I've been working on getting the Website up to snuff and porting over > some of the content from the old CloudStack.org site. This is by no > means done, but gives a better working copy... > > A copy of this can be seen here: > > http://diss

Re: [Events] Free Passes to LInuxCon/CloudOpen

i could use two... ill be in san diego for the dates On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Duncan Johnston Watt wrote: > Mark > > Cloudsoft also has a few free passes (first come first served) to CloudOpen. > > Best > > Duncan > > On 15 August 2012 21:26, Hinkle Mark R. wrote: > >> I think I'll have

Re: Spawning VMs in bridged mode on KVM ( Cloudstack 3.0.2)

Given what appears to be a serious (though probably simple) bug in CentOS/RHEL 6.3 and libvirt 0.9.10-21.el6 I don't know how ANYONE has VLANs working (bonded or otherwise) in a KVM environment. I've opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849766 Anyone here with an actual, workin

RE: Spawning VMs in bridged mode on KVM ( Cloudstack 3.0.2)

On CentOS 6.3 hosts with 6.3 guests, latest libvirt, I have wiresharked the lines and tagging is working. I am not using bonding. Thanks Kelcey Jamison-Damage Infrastructure Systems Architect Backbone Technology | Backbone Datavault | Backbone IT Services 55 East 7th Ave Vancouver - BC Canada V

RE: Spawning VMs in bridged mode on KVM ( Cloudstack 3.0.2)

I did have to stop using VRs as gateways because the ARP table was constantly screwing up. Kelcey Jamison-Damage Infrastructure Systems Architect Backbone Technology | Backbone Datavault | Backbone IT Services 55 East 7th Ave Vancouver - BC Canada V5T 1M4 kel...@bbits.ca | 604-331-1152 ext. 114

Re: [Events] Free Passes to LInuxCon/CloudOpen

Done. I have two more if anyone is interested. On 21 August 2012 01:06, Outback Dingo wrote: > i could use two... ill be in san diego for the dates > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Duncan Johnston Watt > wrote: > > Mark > > > > Cloudsoft also has a few free passes (first come first served)

Re: FW: [WEBSITE][DOCS] Publican-based docs publishing?

> > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 3:23 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [WEBSITE][DOCS] Publican-based docs publishing? > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:45 PM, David Nalley wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 16,

Re: [ASFCS40] Help needed to resolve the mysql-connector blocker issue

Just a heads up - I plan on reverting this change. While build-all still works, unit tests are failing, and deploydb is also failing, even when mysql java library is installed locally. The former I can live with for a short time, and the latter I can't. Rajesh, Pradeep - Please take a look at th

Review Request: Return reference to existing NAS datastore in vCenter

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6701/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kelven Yang. Description --- Return refer

Review Request: Pick newer system VM template for vmware in latest cloudstack release.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6702/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Description --- Modifying

SIOCGMIIPHY on 'eth0' failed: Operation not supported

hi all: after create VM, all of them can not connect,because mii does not exist. when i launch mii-tool ,error occurs. SIOCGMIIPHY on 'eth0' failed: Operation not supported. it is a debug environment Cloudstack 2.X, xenserver version is 5.6 SP2 1.have you all encountered this question? 2.whe

RE: [ASFCS40] Help needed to resolve the mysql-connector blocker issue

Dave, Without the actual library, those things will break. A lot of unit testing is testing access to DB. Deploy db is more or less changes to mysql. I'm not sure how you expect Rajesh and Pradeep to fix them. Any suggestions? --Alex > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailt

Re: [ASFCS40] Help needed to resolve the mysql-connector blocker issue

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Dave, > > Without the actual library, those things will break. A lot of unit testing > is testing access to DB. Deploy db is more or less changes to mysql. I'm > not sure how you expect Rajesh and Pradeep to fix them. Any suggestions? > >

RE: [ASFCS40] Help needed to resolve the mysql-connector blocker issue

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 7:12 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: Rajesh Battala; Pradeep Soundararajan > Subject: Re: [ASFCS40] Help needed to resolve the mysql-connector blocker > issue > > On Mon, A

Re: [Discuss] CloudStack architecture to a loosely-coupled component oriented distributed architecture

On 20/08/12 11:23 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote: >Murali, > >The key point is the shifting to event-driven programming model itself at >orchestration layer, the underlying facility is currently not at critical >path, we will need to do a messaging arbitration here so that we can >plugin a suitable MQ s

Re: [Discuss] CloudStack architecture to a loosely-coupled component oriented distributed architecture

Sure Darren. Current StateListener has both pre and post state transitions. I think post transition fits exactly. On 20/08/12 10:32 PM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote: >Murali, > >This is just a random implementation note. Beware of DB transactions >and events. Events shouldn't be sent until DB tran

Re: [Discuss] CloudStack architecture to a loosely-coupled component oriented distributed architecture

On 8/20/12 9:33 PM, "Murali Reddy" wrote: >On 20/08/12 11:23 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote: > >>Murali, >> >>The key point is the shifting to event-driven programming model itself at >>orchestration layer, the underlying facility is currently not at critical >>path, we will need to do a messaging ar

Re: [Discuss] CloudStack architecture to a loosely-coupled component oriented distributed architecture

On 8/20/12 9:49 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote: > > >On 8/20/12 9:33 PM, "Murali Reddy" wrote: > >>On 20/08/12 11:23 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote: >> >>>Murali, >>> >>>The key point is the shifting to event-driven programming model itself >>>at >>>orchestration layer, the underlying facility is currently

Re: Domr and Network

Hi, On 21-Aug-2012, at 2:52 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > On 8/20/12 2:34 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> A domr is checked for its existence and if it does not exist it is >> created whenever an instance is launched. If I stop or stop and delete >> the domr, HA won't recreate domr. I

Re: Review Request: Return reference to existing NAS datastore in vCenter

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6701/#review10567 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sateesh Chodapuneedi On Aug. 21, 2012, 1:11 a

Re: Review Request: Support for local data disk feature. (CS-14277)

> On Aug. 20, 2012, 8:49 p.m., edison su wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java, line 3040 > > > > > > why is volume migration between local storage pool disabled? Migration between local stor

Re: Ideas for virtual Redundant Router

Hi Chiradeep, On 21-Aug-2012, at 2:50 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > On 8/16/12 2:41 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >> >> >> 1. Async Callback: >> With bug http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15970 fixed, the >> management server knows when router's redundant changed and CS re-applies >> iptables r