That's such great news for the project and a strong endorsement of how we have
worked together successfully. Everyone should be so proud. Let us keep it up
as a TLP!
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wedne
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to invite the CloudStack community to
+1 (binding)
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 8:17 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Change the project bylaws to modify the PMC Chair voting
> process and add a term length
>
> Hi all
urce.java:73)
at
com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.run(DirectAgentAttache.java:191)
at
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:266)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
2013-02-12 14:11:24,653 WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-192:null) Unable to cleanup VIF
You gave an invalid object reference. The object may have recently been
deleted. The class parameter gives the type of reference given, and the
handle parameter echoes the bad value given.
at com.xensource.xenapi.Types.checkResponse(Types.java:207)
at com.xensource.xenapi.Connection.dispatch(Connection.java:368)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServerConnectionPool$XenServerConnection.dispatch(XenServerConnectionPool.java:909)
at com.xensource.xenapi.VIF.unplug(VIF.java:804)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.handleVmStartFailure(CitrixResourceBase.java:1100)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1353)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:497)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:73)
at
com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.run(DirectAgentAttache.java:191)
at
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:266)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
Regards,
kevin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
kevin parker updated CLOUDSTACK-1245:
-
Labels: Reproduceable (was: )
> Not able to install Debian based PV Instan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
kevin parker updated CLOUDSTACK-1245:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: Seems issue with Ubuntu 10.04 support for xen,as it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
kevin parker reopened CLOUDSTACK-1245:
--
It is possible to create PV Debian instances using xen centre
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
kevin parker closed CLOUDSTACK-1245.
Resolution: Not A Problem
Seems issue with Ubuntu 10.04 support for xen,as it is not
kevin parker created CLOUDSTACK-1245:
Summary: Not able to install Debian based PV Instances from
ISO,only HVM instances is possible.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1245
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
kevin parker updated CLOUDSTACK-1225:
-
Description:
Its been 3 weeks since i am working on Cloud Stack 4.0.1
(http
kevin parker created CLOUDSTACK-1225:
Summary: Storage System vm id keeps on increasing
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1225
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1225
Project: CloudStack
Kevin Kluge created CLOUDSTACK-1146:
---
Summary: auto update of KVM agent
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1146
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1146
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: New
Hi all,
I am not sure whether this is a problem with my setup
version:Cloudstack 3.0.5-0.4323 with mysql on Centos 6.2 (XCP domU)
Host:XCP 1.6.10 on xcp domU(Can this cause any such issues?? ie xcp on vm
which runs on xcp hosts)
While adding hosts i am getting these errors in accesslog
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Kluge reassigned CLOUDSTACK-993:
--
Assignee: Prachi Damle
> "admin" user is not getting created wh
+1 (binding)
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 7:30 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Project Bylaws
>
> Hi all,
>
> We've had some good discussions on the proposed bylaws over th
eviews, etc and be more efficient for the project. So
I'd propose to take the dates you listed and add two months to all of them.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 9:32 AM
> To:
&
minor releases
(presumably no features) in between the majors.
-kevin
> > Digging this out of the past, IIRC, we never got around to resolving
> > the time period for releases. We should come to a conclusion on this
> > topic! I'd like to propose that we follow a 4 month rele
+1, this is great news. Congrats to all!
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 10:21 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4
Thanks for having me, and thanks also to Rajesh et al for the Bangalore slot,
too. We had some great CloudStack interest and questions at both events.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 7:3
PS: this tool looks great!
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:59 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Name of the CLI
>
> Hi,
>
> I've named our new CLI, cloudmonkey after our mascot
Rohit, is this the name of the project or the name of the command line tool (as
run from the shell) or both?
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:59 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.o
+1 to the monkey
> -Original Message-
> From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 9:25 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Adopt the Monkey?
>
> +1 to the cloud monkey
>
> -Original Message
Who all will be there? I know David, Wido and I will be. Others? Sebastien,
are you at LinuxCon instead?
There's a series of CloudStack talks Tuesday afternoon. Anyone up for some
socializing afterwards?
-kevin
+1 (binding)
CentOS 6.2 for MS + XS 6.0.2 and NFS for primary.
The docs are vastly improved from what I saw in the last vote round. I have a
few nits but will just file them as bugs.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
+1
Important feature but IMO shouldn't hold the first release given that other
pieces are ready.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 9:55 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE][ASFCS40] Dro
nly problem I'd defer the fix.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:04 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?
>
> Do we have any idea how many CS
Kevin Kluge created CLOUDSTACK-367:
--
Summary: CLI
Key: CLOUDSTACK-367
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-367
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: New Feature
Affects
e to later post docs that actually work so people can use
the RPMs they build. Then we're telling people not to use the released docs,
etc... We should just do it right the first time.
-kevin
PS: ditto for debs...
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip
I don't see how we can ship without the RPM install docs posted. Once you
build the RPMs I haven't found anything posted that tells you what to do.
Seems like many developers and all non-developers will fail at the install. Am
I missing something?
-kevin
> -Ori
+1 (binding)
> -Original Message-
> From: chip.child...@sungard.com [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] On
> Behalf Of Chip Childers (ASF)
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:21 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, firs
f the
console to system VM's is working, confirming all the nics on the system VM's
are on the right network definitions is a painful thing. Each time I tweak a CS
setting that requires a CS service restart on mgmt server I have to re-login
and drill down again.
Kevin F.
Sent from my p
It will also work with the 5.6.* releases. But I'd recommend new installs
using the latest XenServer release, which is 6.0.2.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 5:26 AM
> T
Brett/Chip, I think you're right. I probably just looked at the license text
and assumed it was modified beyond usual BSD. I suggest we get it approved as
a BSD derivative. See
https://github.com/jenkinsci/trilead-ssh2/blob/master/LICENSE.txt.
-kevin
> -Original Message
't be a very long talk.
> > Most of the storage stuff is inside Ceph and for CloudStack is just an
> > integration.
> >
> > We could do a "new in 4.0" talk? I could highlight RBD and you can
> > take a bit more time for the Nicira integration?
> >
old/poor. Since the big RHEL upgrade I
haven't seen as much interest.
-kevin
some commits on
Nicira NVP integration as well. SDN is bleeding edge for CloudStack now but is
an interesting future direction. Would be great to get some feedback on these
features.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Outback Dingo [mailto:outbackdi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tues
then could we not
set author for that commit as the actual author rather than the whole team?
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 8:26 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re:
> The point David also made is the question: Which platforms are we going to
> build binaries for?
>
> To put it in a simple way: "The agent is nothing more then a couple of JAR
> files which need to be run with JSVC and it needs the libvirt-java bindings to
> talk to a recent version of libvirt
7;ll
get from making a change for this reason.
-kevin
>
> OK, in that case I propose Mice for discussion by the PMC. Kevin, David, over
> to you.
>
That's in process now. In fact, Mice has been voted as committer and accepted.
Congrats, Mice!!
-kevin
rk you'll have to be able to live migrate where source host OS
version is lesser than destination host OS version. Does anyone know if that's
actually supported by Ubuntu 10.04/12.04 and RHEL 6.{0,1}/RHEL 6.{2,3}?
-kevin
uring build? Even make it optional in the
build, default off.
-kevin
eople wanted to know where
to go to download the binary.
Also, I assume all community members are welcome to staff the booth for Apache
CloudStack?
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Hinkle Mark R. [mailto:mrhin...@cloudstack.org]
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 11:19 AM
&g
Chip, I'm always happy to get mails that show progress being made. Thanks for
all the effort on Apache CloudStack!
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 12:00 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@inc
I'd support doing query only. If a significant user need for SOAP emerges we
can re-evaluate with clear data on the use case or tool that needs it.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Johnston Watt
> [mailto:duncan.johnstonw...@cloudsoftcorp.com]
> Sent: Th
code, that's just
what it is.
I'm not a lawyer so please don't take this as legal advice from Citrix or me.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:09 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubat
he hypervisor host from and
expect CloudStack to manage the host.
For Ubuntu, I'd personally be fine with only supporting 12.04, but then we
should have a procedure that tells people running CS 3.0.2 with ubuntu 10.04
how to upgrade to CS 4.0 with Ubuntu 12.04 with minimal downtime. Same for
RHEL/CentOS at 6.2+.
-kevin
why multiple features would go into the same feature branch.
I could potentially see a desire for a feature branch off a feature branch
where there is a dependency. Perhaps someone can explain why this mixing was
done with VPC and Autoscale.
-kevin
My understanding is that the "convenience builds" can include KVM support
enabled. The source release will include the code with the build option off.
So most users won't notice any changes.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...
; Or do we want to go for more integration-like talks?
>
> What about the new packaging/devCloud/future directions?
I was also thinking of a scalability talk. It could span
operational/deployment issues, software design and architecture, issues we've
had to fix, and how we test for scale.
-kevin
I don't see an upside to a change. And there's clear downside from loss of
what has been built. So I view any move from "Apache CloudStack" as a
counter-productive distraction.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co
Are we agreed this is the workflow -- original submitter should check and then
close as Submitted after the checkin?
We should also have the committers " use the exact phrase and author in the
commit" as David says.This seems preferable as is effectively automated.
-kevin
>
I'm surprised by the number of Pending and Submitted. I have seen so many
approval messages (I counted 48 in my quick mailbox search) that it seems odd
that only 5 patches are classified as submitted. Are people just not
completing the workflow when something gets submitted?
-
rred when I was working to understand what challenges
would exist if there were an "Apache CloudStack" project, prior to a project
submission. That discussion wasn't public.
-kevin
n fix from master into the 5.2.x branch. Perhaps the release
manager should create a ticket then assign it to whoever committed the original
patch? So by committing a patch you agree to subsequently merge it into other
branches if asked to do so by a release manager in the project.
-kevin
I don't see how there is a capability issue. At one time we had problems with
people not having enough space to uncompress the downloaded system VM template
during install time. We added prereqs to help avoid that problem. But I don't
see how to justify 250 GB.
> -Original Message-
>
I had mentioned this concern (licensing and system VM presence) in the earliest
Apache discussions, and I included it in the CloudStack project proposal at
[1]. I had been told that it was a non-issue. That is, as long as the code in
our repo is of allowed license this dependency is fine, and
Anthony, would you be able to reach out to the Xen Community to see if they
will take this upstream, or introduce a config that allows it to be disabled?
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 12:5
I understood GCC to have a AL 2.0 license and to be used by the UI, as
described in [1]. So it should at least be acceptable per license. I don't
see why it has to be kept in the source tree but a removal of it should also
include build changes to download a known-stable version for use in t
I've heard some requests for that and I do think it would be a good feature.
CloudBridge is notably different from site-site VPN though. It works at layer
2, does WAN optimization, and requires CloudBridge at both ends of the
connection.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> Fr
Rajesh, can you provide some rationale for this choice versus other options.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 10:44 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Hibernate
There's some detail on this at
http://confluence.cloudstack.org/display/dev/Moving+dependencies+to+ASF+approved+licenses.
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 3:36 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: R
With NFS, XenServer can do thin provisioning in the VHD files.
With iSCSI (and without StorageLink), XenServer assumes the storage device does
the thin provisioning.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Diego Spinola Castro [mailto:spinolacas...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June
Kimi, create a ticket for INFRA at http://issues.apache.org. following the
convention with cn this would create cloudstack-users...@incubator.apache.org.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Kimihiko Kitase [mailto:kimihiko.kit...@citrix.co.jp]
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 201
Lu, you might visit UShareSoft. See http://www.usharesoft.com/appstore.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Lu Heng [mailto:h...@anytimechinese.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 10:27 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Cloudstack pre-configed t
I haven't heard of anyone working on it. Please don't hesitate to start the
effort.:)
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Xin Liu [mailto:codeoe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 5:09 PM
> To: Kevin Kluge
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
the volume commands
needed in this environment, so if something goes wrong the debugging process
can be tedious (as compared to NFS, where you can manage VHD files with
ls,cp,etc).
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Lucas Hughes [mailto:lucas.hug...@ecommerce.com]
> Sent: Wednesda
I've heard the request before several times. But I don't know of anyone
working on it. I don't recall seeing further messages from the original poster
on that thread.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesda
rit
> could potentially take longer as we have to both do the work, and wait for
> allocation of resources.
If that's the case can we default to ReviewBoard, and choose something else
only if there is strong objection?
Does anyone have anything +/- to say from actual use of ReviewBoard?
-kevin
support team as Swamy
suggests. Thanks.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Lu Heng [mailto:h...@anytimechinese.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 10:53 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Regarding 3.0.3
>
> Hi
>
> I saw the release not
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 12:15 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: OCSON
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 14
Can we have the maintainers take responsibility for the incoming patch stream
right away?
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 4:46 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Maint
system is fully implemented this
will be easier given broader ownership, but if a tool could help us track (as
in Alena's suggestions) that would be a big win. It should also help us be
more responsive to the community as it'd help ensure we respond to patches.
-kevin
> -Origina
Yes, Citrix CloudPlatform is based on Apache CloudStack. You can download it
from www.citrix.com.
Suggest we take any further commercial discussion off list…
-kevin
From: d...@soleks.com [mailto:d...@soleks.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 11:24 AM
To: Kevin Kluge
Cc: cloudstack-dev
.
-kevin
From: d...@soleks.com [mailto:d...@soleks.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 10:52 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Kevin Kluge
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: BIG-IP F5 support in cloud stack 3.0.x
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for reply. My CS installation is domain
de of existing deployments
in addition to changes in the use of the F5 SDK. It will be much easier to
adapt CloudStack to the new API...
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: d...@soleks.com [mailto:d...@soleks.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 9:36 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@inc
Rajesh, do you think it's limited in the sense of number of test cases and/or
coverage?If not, what do you mean by 'limited'?
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 8:39
d few have followed the
steps in it. Would appreciate constructive feedback...
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric [mailto:epretori...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 4:51 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Bug Fix + Feature Request: cloud-in
repo since there are several other places that
would still have 3.0.x.
I'd ask if anyone (besides Citrix) has cause to be interested in the 3.0.x
branch at this point. If not it seems harmless to delete it, and push focus
to master and a new 4.0.x branch.
-kevin
d check the stability to confirm my first paragraph...
-kevin
alify as
"quick". So I'd request that Citrix do a release of the XenServerJava library
outside the XenServer release framework. This could even be a re-release of
whatever CloudStack is currently using.
-kevin
with new
codenames if desired. This clear assignment will help reduce confusion as we
split Citrix and Apache release cycles. It will require further scrubbing in
the bug db and on the wiki as these codenames are referenced there.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: David
ct we'll be doing more in the
U.S., Japan, and the U.K. or Germany as well.
-kevin
[1] http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/COMM/BeijingMay2012
into master or that some
existing change in master obviated the need for the new change there. Git
should be able to help with making sure we don't miss anything.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Pradeep Soundararajan [mailto:pradeep.soundarara...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Mond
Adrian, do you have specific list calls that are not backwards compatible from
3.0.x to 2.2.x?I thought we had made the end-user API backwards compatible
(assuming IDs are strings...).
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: fernc...@gmail.com [mailto:fernc...@gmail.com] On Beh
n run regularly,
and with the new automation framework and the code changes since the last run I
don't think the old results are meaningful.
But yes, would love to see it for some typical deployment.
-kevin
ce of software. (My
understanding is that Citrix wrote all that code, and it could be released
under multiple licenses if needed, which would presumably not upset the
Xen/XenServer community.)
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Wednesday
Yes please, keep filing the bugs! A lot of work went into 3.0.x to fix the
most common cases of "X does not work so I need to go edit the db". We have to
keep rooting out these problems.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Russell [mailto:charles.russ...@ki
Mohammad, these ICLAs were all mailed or faxed in several weeks ago. I will
investigate what happened.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: nour.moham...@gmail.com [mailto:nour.moham...@gmail.com]
> On Behalf Of Mohammad Nour El-Din
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012
>
> To fix, I stood up separate vlan and subnet for storage traffic.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Landreth [mailto:crackerjackm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:57 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [xenserver6 netwo
Emailing this to the list as per the IRC conversation.
I was having issues two nics and the default route which wasn't used
for cloudstack management.
I am using advanced networking so this "patch" works for me. I don't
know exactly why the
conditional is in there or even why the gateway is need
s with Chiradeep some timeback. There is probably
already a bug for this. But either way, I agree getting feedback from the SSVM
to the user would be a huge step forward in debugging initial install problems.
-kevin
> The particular behavior in question is how we handle provisioning instances
> that don't have a matching tag. Today, you might not have that
> 'really_really_fast' tag but your machine might still end up on the
> 'really_really_fast'-tagged storage. (e.g. the tagged resources aren't
> exclusively
Matt, thanks much for your attendance. This was a great introduction to
Apache for the attendees.
We'll continue with day two tomorrow. All are welcome, even if you missed the
first day. The second day will be more code-oriented.
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Ma
ng a zone, then configuring the physical network outside of the
> wizard.
>
> Will
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:kevin.kl...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 9:56 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Salvatore Orlando
> Subje
to cleartext exclusively?
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 10:08 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: user credntials
>
> In your example, they would need to know how t
2/12 6:40 AM, "Salvatore Orlando"
> wrote:
>
> >I believe it is used as a default setting for all clusters in the zone.
> >But then you are still free to override that setting for specific
> >clusters.
> >
> >Salvatore
> >
> >> -Ori
When you add a zone in 3.0.x there is a field for Hypervisor. Why is that?
Hi Alex, glad to hear you think the community is working well. We followed
the template that was pre-existing and added content to it. Personally I
think it's fine, but this is my first involvement in producing this report so
would certainly appreciate feedback.
-kevin
> -
y and keeps the password
> >safe as is done by countless other websites taking plaintext passwords
> >from the users.
> >
> >With plaintext passwords cloudstack can now seamlessly work with
> >external authentication systems as well. With this we do not need a new
>
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
