> >> > >> Well, that's kind off a Citrix question. Is Citrix interested in > >> having a public branch to work in? From a community perspective it > >> woudl appear that only the master branch is of interest plus any > >> feature branches that are public. > > > > I don't get the Citrix question? > > Cirtix has released/is releasing their product from the 3.0.x branch. It is > AFAIK > immaterial to the community. However, if Citrix is interested in keeping the > 3.0.x branch in the open on the Apache git server, the community should not > remove the branch as Cirtrix is after all also a member of the community. > > Thus the Citrix connection and the relevance to this discussion.
Citrix could continue to do commercial releases off the 3.0.x branch even if it were deleted from the Apache git repo since there are several other places that would still have 3.0.x. I'd ask if anyone (besides Citrix) has cause to be interested in the 3.0.x branch at this point. If not it seems harmless to delete it, and push focus to master and a new 4.0.x branch. -kevin
