> -----Original Message----- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 2:20 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Patches review > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Adrian Cole <adrian.f.c...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > +1 gerrit, particularly as it helps avoid additional process > > +mismatches for > > folks working in both openstack and cloudstack > > So while I like the thinking here, let me present the flip side of the coin. > Reviewboard is what is used in a large number of other ASF projects, so > getting reviewboard up and running is just a ticket. Whereas gerrit would > mean we would need to have a set of committers maintain that > infrastructure. Not necessarily a blocker, but something else to consider. > This > also means we could likely get reviewboard up in short order, while gerrit > could potentially take longer as we have to both do the work, and wait for > allocation of resources.
If that's the case can we default to ReviewBoard, and choose something else only if there is strong objection? Does anyone have anything +/- to say from actual use of ReviewBoard? -kevin
