Re: [DISCUSS]De-coupling Account Services and User services.

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Manikanta Kattamuri wrote: > Hi All, > > Presently Account Services and Account Manager classes are responsible for > all the user operations like create, login, edit/update, change password, > lock user etc.. > > What i am thinking of is to create a new UserServic

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1178) DB Commit warning logged for every Deploy VM request

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573282#comment-13573282 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1178: -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1037) Make cloudmonkey awesome-er: Online help docs and api discovery, better colored output, parameter value autocompletion

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573280#comment-13573280 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1037: -

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1077) Fix and move DomainChecker adapter to plugins/acl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rohit Yadav updated CLOUDSTACK-1077: Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0) 4.2.0 > Fix and move DomainChec

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-636) API refactoring -- Annotate api cmd classes with @ACL appropriately

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rohit Yadav reassigned CLOUDSTACK-636: -- Assignee: Fang Wang (was: Rohit Yadav) > API refactoring -- Annotate api cmd c

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-1077) Fix and move DomainChecker adapter to plugins/acl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rohit Yadav reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1077: --- Assignee: (was: Rohit Yadav) > Fix and move DomainChecker adapter to plu

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-681) Dedicate Pod, Cluster or Host to a domain

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] deepti dohare updated CLOUDSTACK-681: - Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0) 4.2.0 > Dedicate Pod, Cluster

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1184 Localization - Add Korean label to all locales

> On Feb. 7, 2013, 7:06 a.m., Pranav Saxena wrote: > > Hi Channy , > > > > Could you please check your patch once again ? It's not applying due to > > this- > > > > error: patch failed: > > client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ru_RU.properties:1114 > > error: client/WEB-INF/classes/resou

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1184 Localization - Add Korean label to all locales

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9359/#review16263 --- Hi Channy , Could you please check your patch once again ? It's not

[DISCUSS]De-coupling Account Services and User services.

Hi All, Presently Account Services and Account Manager classes are responsible for all the user operations like create, login, edit/update, change password, lock user etc.. What i am thinking of is to create a new UserService in Utils and move the user methods in AccountServices to it and follow

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1184) Localization - Add Korean label to all locales

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573252#comment-13573252 ] Channy Yun commented on CLOUDSTACK-1184: Please review https://reviews.apache

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1184 Localization - Add Korean label to all locales

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9359/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Pranav Saxena and Jessica Wang. Description -

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-667: VM's base image updation facility

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9158/#review16261 --- Your test file is giving an error on the review board. Can you please

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-924: source_template_id set to NULL when a template is created from a snapshot

> On Jan. 9, 2013, 8:43 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > You need to take care of migration as well. Any thoughts on that ? > > Saksham Srivastava wrote: > The fix is only for the new volumes which are created from snapshots > which were themselves created from volumes which have a non-null tem

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-1050 (No section for Adding Load Balancer Rule)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9097/#review16258 --- Patch applied cleanly and merged with master and 4.1 . 4.1 - Commit:

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1050) No Documentation on Adding a Load Balancer Rule

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573243#comment-13573243 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1050: -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1050) No Documentation on Adding a Load Balancer Rule

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573242#comment-13573242 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1050: -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1184) Localization - Add Korean label to all locales

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573235#comment-13573235 ] Pranav Saxena commented on CLOUDSTACK-1184: --- I have enabled it on the UI .

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-1050 (No section for Adding Load Balancer Rule)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9097/ --- (Updated Feb. 7, 2013, 6:13 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers,

RE: docs.cloudstack.org

Try this link https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Home. It also gives access to most of the design docs. Regards, Devdeep > -Original Message- > From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:28 AM > To: Abhinandan Prateek; Chi

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-520) Dependency jar names mismatch with install-non-oss.sh

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rohit Yadav resolved CLOUDSTACK-520. Resolution: Fixed While one can read that wiki suggests to rename them, fix applied on

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-520) Dependency jar names mismatch with install-non-oss.sh

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573228#comment-13573228 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-520: ---

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-520) Dependency jar names mismatch with install-non-oss.sh

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573229#comment-13573229 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-520: ---

Re: docs.cloudstack.org

That¹s a bad design. Clicking to show children every time. I am looking for High availability doc that used to be there. On 06/02/13 8:43 PM, "Abhinandan Prateek" wrote: >Probably you are looking for this >https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/design.html >You need to click on "Show Children" on

Re: Multiple IP addresses per nic

Jayapal, Can you also make sure the branch information is included in the corresponding ticket. -abhi On 07/02/13 10:42 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com>> wrote: Hi Pranav, Changes for the MIPN features are pushed to the below branch. https://github.com/Jayapal

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-710) Host addition fails if /root/.ssh does not exist

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rohit Yadav reassigned CLOUDSTACK-710: -- Assignee: (was: Rohit Yadav) > Host addition fails if /root/.ssh does not e

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-237) StopVMCommand reported success in spite of failing to stop a VM which got stuck during installation from an ISO

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rohit Yadav reassigned CLOUDSTACK-237: -- Assignee: (was: Rohit Yadav) > StopVMCommand reported success in spite of f

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-1176) Issue with snapshots(create/list)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mice Xia resolved CLOUDSTACK-1176. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Sailaja Mada (was: Mice Xia) 4.1 15d66094681f105fe2555

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-1181) mvn deploy db failing with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rohit Yadav resolved CLOUDSTACK-1181. - Resolution: Fixed > mvn deploy db failing with NPE > ---

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1181) mvn deploy db failing with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573216#comment-13573216 ] Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-1181: - The fix is to simply ignore NPEs i

Re: storage_refactor branch

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:33:32PM -0700, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:10:27PM -0700, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > >> OK, thanks...I wasn't sure when feature freeze was. > >> > >> Do we have a roadmap that might indicate

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1176) Issue with snapshots(create/list)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573215#comment-13573215 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1176: -

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1184) Localization - Add Korean label to all locales

Channy Yun created CLOUDSTACK-1184: -- Summary: Localization - Add Korean label to all locales Key: CLOUDSTACK-1184 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1184 Project: CloudStack

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1176) Issue with snapshots(create/list)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573214#comment-13573214 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1176: -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1181) mvn deploy db failing with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573213#comment-13573213 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1181: -

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1181) mvn deploy db failing with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rohit Yadav updated CLOUDSTACK-1181: Fix Version/s: (was: 4.2.0) 4.1.0 > mvn deploy db failing w

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1181) mvn deploy db failing with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573212#comment-13573212 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1181: -

Re: storage_refactor branch

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:10:27PM -0700, Mike Tutkowski wrote: >> OK, thanks...I wasn't sure when feature freeze was. >> >> Do we have a roadmap that might indicate when 4.2 (or whatever it will be >> called) is expected for release? > > I s

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-1181) mvn deploy db failing with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rohit Yadav reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1181: --- Assignee: Rohit Yadav (was: Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati) > mvn depl

Re: storage_refactor branch

As you can see, it doesn't matter for you that the storage refactor branch didn't make it into 4.1, because you wouldn't have had time to get any storage code into cloudstack 4.1 anyway. So it's fine to develop in tandem with Edison's branch, so long as it's far enough along to do so. If he merges

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-1176) Issue with snapshots(create/list)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mice Xia reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1176: Assignee: Mice Xia > Issue with snapshots(create/list) > -

Re: Review Request: cloudstack 4.0 UI - check in Korean translation.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9325/#review16255 --- Merged the patch with asf/4.1 as well - Localization:Korean Transla

Re: storage_refactor branch

Thanks, Chip! On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:10:27PM -0700, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > > OK, thanks...I wasn't sure when feature freeze was. > > > > Do we have a roadmap that might indicate when 4.2 (or whatever it will be > > called) is expected

Korean Translation now Available in CloudStack 4.0 UI

Thanks Channy for the patch . I have added the code for enabling it on the UI now . Regards, Pranav -Original Message- From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Pranav Saxena Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:49 AM To: Jessica Wang Cc: cloudstack; Pranav S

Re: storage_refactor branch

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:10:27PM -0700, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > OK, thanks...I wasn't sure when feature freeze was. > > Do we have a roadmap that might indicate when 4.2 (or whatever it will be > called) is expected for release? I should probaby put this on the wiki, but we've been planning on

Re: Review Request: cloudstack 4.0 UI - check in Korean translation.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9325/#review16254 --- I have merged the patch with asf/master .I'll cherry pick it up to 4.

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-1050 (No section for Adding Load Balancer Rule)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9097/ --- (Updated Feb. 7, 2013, 5:18 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers,

Re: Question about storage plug-in architecture

Cool! Thanks, Marcus On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > That's right. The primary storage mechanism was designed such that you > could just continue adding primary storage devices as you go. So you > could have four storage devices/primary storage pools all with the tag >

Re: Question about storage plug-in architecture

That's right. The primary storage mechanism was designed such that you could just continue adding primary storage devices as you go. So you could have four storage devices/primary storage pools all with the tag 'fast', and cloudstack will use them up. There's an allocation algorithm that you can se

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-1050 (No section for Adding Load Balancer Rule)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9097/#review16253 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jessica Tomechak On Jan. 29, 2013, 5:32 a.m.,

Re: Review Request: Fix for CloudStack-462. Installation Guide Errors Are Fixed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8636/#review16252 --- Created a ticket to request QA to test the new installation procedure

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1183) QA documentation changes in Install Guide for bug CLOUDSTACK-462

Jessica Tomechak created CLOUDSTACK-1183: Summary: QA documentation changes in Install Guide for bug CLOUDSTACK-462 Key: CLOUDSTACK-1183 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1183

Re: storage_refactor branch

OK, thanks...I wasn't sure when feature freeze was. Do we have a roadmap that might indicate when 4.2 (or whatever it will be called) is expected for release? On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:28:54AM +0530, Devdeep Singh wrote: > > HI Mike, > >

Re: storage_refactor branch

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:28:54AM +0530, Devdeep Singh wrote: > HI Mike, > > My understanding is that feature freeze for 4.1.0 happened on Jan 31st. So, > storage refactoring work may not be in it. It would be in 4.2 or whatever the > next release is. Someone on the list can correct me if I am

Re: Fwd: Question about storage plug-in architecture

That's the reply to issue that everyone has been discussing. I did it too, even knowing about it. On Feb 6, 2013 9:58 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > It looks like I accidentally sent this out only to you, Marcus. > > Sending it onto the community at large now. > > -- Forwarded message

Re: Question about storage plug-in architecture

Based on your walk through above, it looks like two different SolidFire storage clusters would equal setting up two different Primary Storage types (because each SolidFire cluster would have a different Management VIP and Storage VIP). That makes sense. Even if the customer only has a single Soli

RE: storage_refactor branch

HI Mike, My understanding is that feature freeze for 4.1.0 happened on Jan 31st. So, storage refactoring work may not be in it. It would be in 4.2 or whatever the next release is. Someone on the list can correct me if I am wrong. Regards, Devdeep > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutko

Fwd: Question about storage plug-in architecture

It looks like I accidentally sent this out only to you, Marcus. Sending it onto the community at large now. -- Forwarded message -- From: Mike Tutkowski Date: Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:52 PM Subject: Re: Question about storage plug-in architecture To: Marcus Sorensen Awesome - tha

Re: Review Request: Fix for CloudStack-462. Installation Guide Errors Are Fixed

> On Jan. 15, 2013, 6:21 a.m., Jessica Tomechak wrote: > > Need someone to test the installation with the changes reflected in this > > proposed doc update. Any takers? > > Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > CS-462 to refers to 4.0 install guide. Is this relevant to 4.1 The errors in the bug pers

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1182) ApiDiscoveryService to present filtered view of API's based on parameters (entity type, since when etc)

Murali Reddy created CLOUDSTACK-1182: Summary: ApiDiscoveryService to present filtered view of API's based on parameters (entity type, since when etc) Key: CLOUDSTACK-1182 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/b

Re: Question about storage plug-in architecture

I know you asked Edison, but I'll chime in and he can confirm/reject. Primary storage will define where your storage is and how to connect. These are up to the developer to decide on, and really come down to what it takes to identify/configure the device management IP address target address/IQN d

Question about storage plug-in architecture

Hi Edison, I have another quick question for you. :) So, my first priority at SolidFire is to get a CloudStack storage plug-in up and running. Once that is complete, I need to look into how to enable CloudStack users to make use of our hard quality of service (QoS) feature. This is the feature

Storage plug-in question

Hi Edison, I have a quick question for you. :) A week or so ago, I went through the process of setting up iSCSI storage to be used from CloudStack with XenServer. When I tried to set the storage up by creating a Primary Storage type and selecting iSCSI as the protocol, the process did not work

storage_refactor branch

Hi Edison, I just wanted to confirm that I understood correctly that the work being done in the storage_refactor branch (to support storage plug-ins) is, in fact, scheduled to be released with CloudStack 4.1.0. As you know, I'm in the process of developing a plug-in for SolidFire. My management

Re: JSON Question

Sounds good, Edison. Thanks! On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Edison Su wrote: > AFAIK, there is no other component using JSON-RPC in CloudStack, maybe you > can try https://code.google.com/p/json-rpc/wiki/Usage, add the following > in your pom file: > > > > > > org.json.

Re: [DISCUSS] Should cloudstack-dev mailing list strip "Reply-to" header?

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > > On 07/02/2013, at 12:05 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > >> The previous setting won't respect CC after the CCed guy replied mail. >> I don't think that's useful. >> >> I truly believe it's developer's responsible to keep track of their >> own topic,

Re: Building SystemVM template appliance

It is confusing -- gaah. I could be persuaded that it could be licensed as Apache. But IANAL and we went through the legal wringer already on this in Aug/Sep. To build the actual systemvm, I would call another helper script in post install: cloudstack.sh which replicates the packages() function in

Re: [DISCUSS] Should cloudstack-dev mailing list strip "Reply-to" header?

On 07/02/2013, at 12:05 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > The previous setting won't respect CC after the CCed guy replied mail. > I don't think that's useful. > > I truly believe it's developer's responsible to keep track of their > own topic, but I also think make it easier for developer to keep track

RE: [DISCUSS] Should cloudstack-dev mailing list strip "Reply-to" header?

CC is a great tool for high traffic mailing list, for example, in LKML, it specifically says(http://www.tux.org/lkml/): Why doesn't answer my mails? Isn't that rude? If you post to the list and want to make sure a specific individual will see the message, Cc: that person. We agreed on CC is ac

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding a page to our website for ecosystem projects / products (Was: Re: Redistributing 3rd party code licensed under Apache License 2.0)

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 09:05:12PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Chip Childers >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:40:17PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: >> >> Excepting the marketing-speak I agree. :) >> >>

[DISCUSS] Adding a page to our website for ecosystem projects / products (Was: Re: Redistributing 3rd party code licensed under Apache License 2.0)

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 09:05:12PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:40:17PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: > >> Excepting the marketing-speak I agree. :) > >> Things that we provide governance for should live at the ASF

Re: Redistributing 3rd party code licensed under Apache License 2.0

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:40:17PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: >> Excepting the marketing-speak I agree. :) >> Things that we provide governance for should live at the ASF. >> Things that don't live at the ASF we (as a whole community) shouldn'

Re: [DISCUSS] Should cloudstack-dev mailing list strip "Reply-to" header?

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 05:05:38PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote: >> The previous setting won't respect CC after the CCed guy replied mail. >> I don't think that's useful. >> >> I truly believe it's developer's responsible to keep track of their >>

Re: Redistributing 3rd party code licensed under Apache License 2.0

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:40:17PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: > Excepting the marketing-speak I agree. :) > Things that we provide governance for should live at the ASF. > Things that don't live at the ASF we (as a whole community) shouldn't > meddle with, and they should feel free to live elsewher

Re: [DISCUSS] Should cloudstack-dev mailing list strip "Reply-to" header?

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 05:05:38PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote: > The previous setting won't respect CC after the CCed guy replied mail. > I don't think that's useful. > > I truly believe it's developer's responsible to keep track of their > own topic, but I also think make it easier for developer to

Re: Redistributing 3rd party code licensed under Apache License 2.0

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 04:03:43PM +, Donal Lafferty wrote: >> > > 4. Finally, where is the best place for 3rd party plugins? This point >> > > was >> > raised in relation to the API client for C#. Any preferences for leaving >> > 3r

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:31:14PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > >> Well, first, Apache CloudStack only releases source code. > >> > >> But Wido is kind enough to also host RPM / DEB package repos for users > >> to take advantage of. Our install

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Alex Huang wrote: >> Well, first, Apache CloudStack only releases source code. >> >> But Wido is kind enough to also host RPM / DEB package repos for users >> to take advantage of. Our install guide explains how to build from >> source, as well as how to use Wido's

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

On Wednesday, February 6, 2013, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 03:30:04PM +0530, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote: > > Thanks Hugo, Wido and Noa for bringing this to some closure :) > > > > I am able to package rpm using "packaging/centos63/package.sh" after > some modification in the p

RE: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

> Well, first, Apache CloudStack only releases source code. > > But Wido is kind enough to also host RPM / DEB package repos for users > to take advantage of. Our install guide explains how to build from > source, as well as how to use Wido's repos. > > This was all true for 4.0.0-incubating, an

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

On Wednesday, February 6, 2013, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote: > Thanks Hugo, Wido and Noa for bringing this to some closure :) > > I am able to package rpm using "packaging/centos63/package.sh" after some > modification in the package.sh script since cloud.spec is looking for > 'cloudstack' Name. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Should cloudstack-dev mailing list strip "Reply-to" header?

The previous setting won't respect CC after the CCed guy replied mail. I don't think that's useful. I truly believe it's developer's responsible to keep track of their own topic, but I also think make it easier for developer to keep track is better. --Sheng On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Alex H

[DISCUSS] Should cloudstack-dev mailing list strip "Reply-to" header?

So let me ask the question then. Right now there's 3 people who believes the agreement was cc if you know the recipient you want and it was not to change the reply to address. One person believes it was to change the reply-to address. Anyone else who thought that was the agreement? Only CC:

Re: Review Request: Patch1 for feature - (CLOUDSTACK-657) VMware vNetwork Distributed Virtual Switch support in CloudStack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9189/ --- (Updated Feb. 7, 2013, 12:33 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy a

Re: Review Request: Patch1 for feature - (CLOUDSTACK-657) VMware vNetwork Distributed Virtual Switch support in CloudStack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9189/ --- (Updated Feb. 7, 2013, 12:33 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy a

RE: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

As per Pradeep's suggestion I modified package.sh, (updated "cloud" to "cloudstack" in .../centos63/package.sh) I am able to create new packages with above changes in Centos6.3, and also able to install MS; but "cloudstack-setup-management" failed with below error [root@auto_ms1 CloudStack

Re: Review Request: Patch1 for feature - (CLOUDSTACK-657) VMware vNetwork Distributed Virtual Switch support in CloudStack

> On Feb. 5, 2013, 7:38 a.m., Koushik Das wrote: > > plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/network/VmwareTrafficLabel.java, > > line 48 > > > > > > Based on the options that you have provided, parseLabel() (remove _

Re: Review Request: Patch1 for feature - (CLOUDSTACK-657) VMware vNetwork Distributed Virtual Switch support in CloudStack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9189/ --- (Updated Feb. 7, 2013, 12:13 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy a

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-953) QA - additional VMX settings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-953: Assignee: Kiran Koneti > QA - additional VMX settings > ---

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-909) QA - OVS support for KVM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-909: Assignee: angeline shen > QA - OVS support for KVM > --

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-905) [QA] Test networking functionality after refactoring

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-905: Assignee: Rayees Namathponnan > [QA] Test networking functionality after re

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-913) QA - Reset SSH Key to access VM (similar to reset password)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-913: Assignee: Sanjeev N > QA - Reset SSH Key to access VM (similar to reset pas

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-826) QA: Testing of Advanced Search Capabilities

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-826: Assignee: Parth Jagirdar (was: angeline shen) > QA: Testing of Advanced Se

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-857) QA - Sanity validatoin for Quickview

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-857: Assignee: Parth Jagirdar > QA - Sanity validatoin for Quickview > -

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-826) QA: Testing of Advanced Search Capabilities

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-826: Assignee: angeline shen (was: Jessica Wang) > QA: Testing of Advanced Sear

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1168) Create firewall rule broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572993#comment-13572993 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1168: -

RE: JSON Question

AFAIK, there is no other component using JSON-RPC in CloudStack, maybe you can try https://code.google.com/p/json-rpc/wiki/Usage, add the following in your pom file: org.json.rpc jsonrpc 1.0 json-rpc http://json-rpc.googlecode.com/svn/mavenrepo

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1139) Ipv6 - Even after the Vm is "Expunged" we see the entry still being present in the router in /etc/dhcphosts.txt

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572957#comment-13572957 ] Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1139: IPv4 has the same issue. We didn't c

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1141) Ipv6 - After network restart (and reboot router) , we do not see the existing vms dnsentries not being programmed in the router.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572898#comment-13572898 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1141: -

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-1141) Ipv6 - After network restart (and reboot router) , we do not see the existing vms dnsentries not being programmed in the router.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1141. Resolution: Fixed > Ipv6 - After network restart (and reboot router) , we do not s

  1   2   3   >