> On Feb. 5, 2013, 7:38 a.m., Koushik Das wrote:
> > plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/network/VmwareTrafficLabel.java, 
> > line 48
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/9189/diff/3/?file=255404#file255404line48>
> >
> >     Based on the options that you have provided, parseLabel() (remove _ 
> > from method name) will handle cases 4 & 5, what about 1, 2, 3. 
> >     
> >     [1] ""
> >     [2] "Name of vSwitch/dvSwitch"
> >     [3] "Name of vSwitch/dvSwitch","VLAN ID"
> >     [4] "Name of vSwitch/dvSwitch","VLAN ID","vSwitch Type" - Example: 
> > dvSwitch0,100,vmwaredvs
> >     [5] "Name of vSwitch/dvSwitch",,"vSwitch Type" - Example: 
> > dvSwitch0,,vmwaredvs
> >     The way you are handling networkLabel doesn't match the description you 
> > have provided

Update patch with additional label processing.
Prefixing method name with _ as it is private method.
Referred to code conventions at 
http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/develop/coding-conventions.html. Didn't 
see specific recommendation for private methods. Hence followed _ prefixing of 
private methods in other places of cloudstack, to quote we can find _getSocket 
in RawHttp.java 


- Sateesh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9189/#review16085
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 7, 2013, 12:13 a.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9189/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 7, 2013, 12:13 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy and Kelven Yang.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is 1st patch for feature 'Support for VMware dvSwitch in CloudStack'.
> This contains 3 newly introduced classes. Added apache license header for all 
> 3 files.
> [1]TrafficLable and [2]VmwareTrafficLabel classes are to define and 
> encapsulate virtual switch type per traffic type along with other network 
> label fields (VLAN ID and physical network).
> [3]DistributedVirtualSwitchMO class is wrapper class for vSphere API calls 
> specific to a distributed virtual switch in a vCenter datacenter.
> Feature highlights:
> Virtual switch type could be chosen at zone level or at cluster level for 
> specific traffic type. All virtual network orchestration would use the 
> specified virtual switch. So far CloudStack could use only vSwitch of type 
> standard vSwitch, with this feature CloudStack can use VMware dvSwitch as 
> well. Support for VMware dvSwitch is available for guest and public traffic 
> types.
> autoExpand of dvPortGroup is available in code but disabled as its breaking 
> because vCenter 4.1 does not support autoExpand feature.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-657.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/network/VmwareTrafficLabel.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9189/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manual testing:-
> 1) Tested guest traffic over dvSwitch on a dedicated physical network. In 
> this case management and public traffic uses standard vSwitch on a common 
> physical network.
> 2) Tested both guest traffic and public traffic over dvSwitch on a physical 
> network.
> 3) Use optional parameters added to AddClusterCmd to override Zone level 
> network traffic label. Tested 2 clusters, one with standard vSwitch and other 
> with dvSwitch.
> 4) Tested all 3 traffic types on single physical network with global 
> parameter 'vmware.use.dvswitch' set to false. This is default configuration 
> scenario.
> 
> 
> Added following tests,
> 1) Test fetching dvSwitch object from vCenter
> 2) Test for presence of dvPortGroup
> 3) Test presence of dvPortGroup
> 4) Test get existing dvPortGroup
> 5) fetch dvPortGroup configuration
> 6) Test compare dvPortGroup configuration
> 7) Test update dvPortGroup configuration
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sateesh Chodapuneedi
> 
>

Reply via email to