Re: [RFC] DevCloud, an all-in-one-box CloudStack development environment

Awesome! But...why so big? (will play with it this weekend) On Jul 6, 2012, at 19:38, "Edison Su" wrote: > Hi All, > I created an all-in-one-box CloudStack development environment, name it as > DevCloud. It's ready to download from > http://download.cloud.com/templates/devcloud/DevCloud.ov

Re: [RFC] DevCloud, an all-in-one-box CloudStack development environment

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Edison Su wrote: > Hi All, >I created an all-in-one-box CloudStack development environment, name it as > DevCloud. It's ready to download from > http://download.cloud.com/templates/devcloud/DevCloud.ova and the document is > put at http://wiki.cloudstack.org

Re: Review Request: CS-15430 Create snapshot should fail if creating snapshot results in exceeding snapshot resource limit for domain-admin or user accounts.

> On July 6, 2012, 9:52 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/storage/snapshot/SnapshotManagerImpl.java, line 375 > > > > > > Please use a finally() to do the decrement The intention here is to decrement th

[RFC] DevCloud, an all-in-one-box CloudStack development environment

Hi All, I created an all-in-one-box CloudStack development environment, name it as DevCloud. It's ready to download from http://download.cloud.com/templates/devcloud/DevCloud.ova and the document is put at http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/comm/DevCloud. If you are a CloudStack developer

RE: Review Request: listSnapshotPolicies command, volumeId parameter made optional.

Also with this implementation what happens is that when the admin calls the api without volumeid he sees all the policies >That¹s exactly what the bug CS-4109 asked for. > >But yes as you point out - >http://confluence.cloudstack.org/display/gen/3.0+API+list*+commands+cha >nge >s says oth

Re: Review Request: listSnapshotPolicies command, volumeId parameter made optional.

On 7/6/12 5:10 PM, "Prachi Damle" wrote: Also with this implementation what happens is that when the admin calls the api without volumeid he sees all the policies >That¹s exactly what the bug CS-4109 asked for. > >But yes as you point out - >http://confluence.cloudstack.org/display/gen/3

RE: Planet Cloudstack

I am all ready to test. Let me know when the system is built. I'm most interested in the functionality of the experience than anything else. Also hopefully the aggregator we choose supports image-blogging. Kelcey Jamison-Damage Infrastructure Systems Architect Backbone IT Service | Backbone Dat

RE: Review Request: listSnapshotPolicies command, volumeId parameter made optional.

>>> Also with this implementation what happens is that when the admin calls the >>> api without volumeid he sees all the policies That’s exactly what the bug CS-4109 asked for. But yes as you point out - http://confluence.cloudstack.org/display/gen/3.0+API+list*+commands+changes says otherwise

Re: Review Request: listSnapshotPolicies command, volumeId parameter made optional.

> On June 28, 2012, 12:21 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > Ideally listSnapshotPolicy should be part of > > BaseListProjectAndAccountResourcesCmd. > > Prachi Damle wrote: > listSnapshotPolicy cannot extend BaseListProjectAndAccountResourcesCmd, > since the snapshotPolicy entity does not carry

Re: Review Request: listSnapshotPolicies command, volumeId parameter made optional.

> On June 28, 2012, 12:21 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > Ideally listSnapshotPolicy should be part of > > BaseListProjectAndAccountResourcesCmd. listSnapshotPolicy cannot extend BaseListProjectAndAccountResourcesCmd, since the snapshotPolicy entity does not carry the account/domain attributes. I

Re: Functional specs for Burbank features "Inter-Vlan Routing" and "Vm Tiers" are posted on wiki

Thanks Chandan. With the level of detail in these test cases, it seems that a significant portion can be automated using Marvin? Are these UI-driven testcases or API-driven, or both? IMO, a performance test establishing a baseline for forwarding performance between various networks is necessary.

Re: Review Request: AWS API calls do not honor the "admin" accounts ability to view/act on the resources owned by regular users.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5606/#review8932 --- Ship it! These changes look good to me. I will apply the patch. -

RE: signing off patches

Yes, I had the same issue as well and sadly review board was not helpful for committing the code. I had to do all the hacks like changing the author info, putting in signed off info manually. That is not the way to go. Either review board should have good integration with submitting the git patc

RE: Functional specs for Burbank features "Inter-Vlan Routing" and "Vm Tiers" are posted on wiki

Test cases for Inter-Vlan Routing(VPC) are provided at http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/QA/Inter-VLAN+Routing+Test+Cases . This is an initial draft and it is periodically being updated, Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com

Re: ASF repo tags

On Jul 6, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >>> How about this, just to define it (more or less what David just said): >>> * For development/feature branches, the developer(s) have a >> responsibility of making sure their

Re: Review Request: CS-15430 Create snapshot should fail if creating snapshot results in exceeding snapshot resource limit for domain-admin or user accounts.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5806/#review8930 --- server/src/com/cloud/storage/snapshot/SnapshotManagerImpl.java

Re: ASF repo tags

> I agree, in that case we'd have to release a 5.2.1, otherwise the users will > go somewhere else. > > I assume whoever was release manager for the 5.2.0 release would own the > subsequent maintenance releases -- including deciding whether or not there is > one, and what goes in if there is one

RE: ASF repo tags

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 12:02 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: ASF repo tags > > > How about this, just to define it (more or less what David just said): > > * For development/feature bran

Re: Review Request: cs-15401- Disjunct Arrow in Network Screen only in Japnese UI in the advanced networking mode

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5801/#review8929 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Federle On July 6, 2012, 10:49 a.m., Pra

Re: Planet Cloudstack

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 02:57:16PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 02:14:18PM -0500, Kelcey Damage (BBITS) wrote: >> > Just moving this over to the dev list. >> > >> > We are building a blog aggregator, kindly hosted by j

Re: Planet Cloudstack

On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 02:57:16PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 02:14:18PM -0500, Kelcey Damage (BBITS) wrote: > > Just moving this over to the dev list. > > > > We are building a blog aggregator, kindly hosted by jlkinsel. > > Possible goals for the aggregator: > > 1) all

Re: Review Request: CS-15429: Create Instance should fail if creating instance results in exceeding volume resource limit for domain-admin or user accounts.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5766/ --- (Updated July 6, 2012, 8:40 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Description (

RE: [DISCUSS] tools directory

I'll try, before the patch is accepted by Xen community, I may need to keep this directory somewhere else. Anthony > -Original Message- > From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:kevin.kl...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 9:56 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISC

Re: Planet Cloudstack

On Jul 6, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 02:14:18PM -0500, Kelcey Damage (BBITS) wrote: >> Just moving this over to the dev list. >> >> We are building a blog aggregator, kindly hosted by jlkinsel. > > Possible goals for the aggregator: > > 1) allow CS developers

Re: Planet Cloudstack

On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 03:52:44PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > just a step back, I think part of the goal would be to get content up > from users as well as committers, as often the user blogs are useful > in a way that committer blogs might not be. +1 to this. There's a lot of folks working w

RE: Planet Cloudstack

Maybe we should keep it as an independent community project for now. We don't want alienate the people we are trying to build this for. Kelcey Jamison-Damage Infrastructure Systems Architect Backbone IT Service | Backbone Datavault | Backbone Technology 55 East 7th Ave Vancouver - BC Canada V5T

Re: Planet Cloudstack

On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 07:44:19PM +, John Kinsella wrote: > Next - what aggregator to use. Drupal and WordPress might be overkill here. I haven't set up a planet in quite some time, and the original Planet Planet software seems to be unmaintained. There's MoonMoon (fork of Planet) though,

Re: Planet Cloudstack

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Kelcey Damage (BBITS) wrote: > If you think it's a good idea I happily second the notion of a different > aggregator on planet.apache. > > I'm not even sure what ASF overhead even amounts to. > It's not much but it is something. Historically p.a.o has all been comm

RE: Planet Cloudstack

As long as it remains community driven and managed. This should be about sharing knowledge and not introducing any form of bureaucracy of tiering in content. Kelcey Jamison-Damage Infrastructure Systems Architect Backbone IT Service | Backbone Datavault | Backbone Technology 55 East 7th Ave Vanc

RE: Planet Cloudstack

If you think it's a good idea I happily second the notion of a different aggregator on planet.apache. I'm not even sure what ASF overhead even amounts to. Kelcey Jamison-Damage Infrastructure Systems Architect Backbone IT Service | Backbone Datavault | Backbone Technology 55 East 7th Ave Vancouv

Re: Planet Cloudstack

On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 02:14:18PM -0500, Kelcey Damage (BBITS) wrote: > Just moving this over to the dev list. > > We are building a blog aggregator, kindly hosted by jlkinsel. Possible goals for the aggregator: 1) allow CS developers to post about their CS work (e.g. pull specific tagged RS

RE: Review Request: CS-15429: Create Instance should fail if creating instance results in exceeding volume resource limit for domain-admin or user accounts.

Please also correct the commit message. " When an instance is created with data volume, disk offering is not taken into account while checking the account limit. Adding a check for the diskoffering" It should instead say something like this - " When an instance is created with data volume, acco

RE: Planet Cloudstack

Most planet sites avoid TM issues by being considered FAN sites, and the derivative. And as for content, I meant ALL users by community, and not specifically contributors. :) Kelcey Jamison-Damage Infrastructure Systems Architect Backbone IT Service | Backbone Datavault | Backbone Technology 55

Re: Planet Cloudstack

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Kelcey Damage (BBITS) wrote: > I vote for planetcloudstack.org as it removes us from ASF and foes not cause > trademark infringement. > One could argue that the presence of cloudstack in the domain name is enough to trigger trademark violation. There's been some t

Re: Review Request: CS-15429: Create Instance should fail if creating instance results in exceeding volume resource limit for domain-admin or user accounts.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5766/#review8928 --- server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java

RE: Planet Cloudstack

To aggregate cloudstack related blogs, from the community. Kelcey Jamison-Damage Infrastructure Systems Architect Backbone IT Service | Backbone Datavault | Backbone Technology 55 East 7th Ave Vancouver - BC Canada V5T 1M4 kel...@bbits.ca | 604-331-1152 ext. 114 -Original Message- From:

RE: Planet Cloudstack

I would be nice if the site was a hybrid, such that it posted aggregation but could also be directly contributed to. Just a thought. Kelcey Jamison-Damage Infrastructure Systems Architect Backbone IT Service | Backbone Datavault | Backbone Technology 55 East 7th Ave Vancouver - BC Canada V5T 1M4

RE: Planet Cloudstack

I vote for planetcloudstack.org as it removes us from ASF and foes not cause trademark infringement. Kelcey Jamison-Damage Infrastructure Systems Architect Backbone IT Service | Backbone Datavault | Backbone Technology 55 East 7th Ave Vancouver - BC Canada V5T 1M4 kel...@bbits.ca | 604-331-1152 e

RE: Planet Cloudstack

Sorry. What is the context for this? Is it to aggregate all blogs regarding cloudstack or cloud? --Alex > -Original Message- > From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 12:44 PM > To: > Subject: Re: Planet Cloudstack > > So I think the first questio

Re: signing off patches

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:51 AM, David Nalley wrote: > git commit has a --author argument > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-commit.html Reviewboard removed author information is annoying. Otherwise git-am would do the trick(and force contributor to respect coding style) well

Re: Planet Cloudstack

So I think the first question is what domain name to give it - the two thoughts I saw were planet.cloudstack.org, or planetcloudstack.org (I just registered the later, just in case). There were some concerns about ASF overhead if we use the cs.o domain, somebody also mentioned the word "tradema

OSC Kyoto, Japan (Aug 3rd and 4th)

We will join OSC Kyoto in Japan on Aug 3rd and 4th. Please feel free to join us. See the following URL (Japanese) in detail. http://www.ospn.jp/osc2012-kyoto/ Thanks Kimi

RE: Planet Cloudstack

Just moving this over to the dev list. We are building a blog aggregator, kindly hosted by jlkinsel. Please use this thread for discussion. Kelcey Jamison-Damage Infrastructure Systems Architect Backbone IT Service | Backbone Datavault | Backbone Technology 55 East 7th Ave Vancouv

Re: Review Request: CS-15425: Clicking on "About" button - Message refers to CloudStack instead of CloudPlatform(p1)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5811/#review8926 --- Unfortunately this is not relevant for the Apache/OSS version, so a re

Re: Review Request: CS-15425: Clicking on "About" button - Message refers to CloudStack instead of CloudPlatform(p1)

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Brian Federle wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/5811/ > > On July 6th, 2012, 6:39 p.m., *David Nalley* wrote: > > This is not at all the desired output. > > This is Apache CloudStack, and the about

Re: Review Request: CS-15425: Clicking on "About" button - Message refers to CloudStack instead of CloudPlatform(p1)

> On July 6, 2012, 6:39 p.m., David Nalley wrote: > > This is not at all the desired output. > > > > This is Apache CloudStack, and the about should reference "Apache > > CloudStack" This bug won't happen on the OSS version ('CloudStack' will always appear in the Apache verison). The modific

RE: Review Request: CS-15425: Clicking on "About" button - Message refers to CloudStack instead of CloudPlatform(p1)

The bug ticket says (created by Chandan) - http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15425 that it is supposed to be 'CloudPlatform' . In case it needs to be 'Apache CloudStack' , I can update the patch by changing my regular expression. Regards, Pranav -Original Message- From: David Nalley

Re: Review Request: CS-15425: Clicking on "About" button - Message refers to CloudStack instead of CloudPlatform(p1)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5811/#review8924 --- This is not at all the desired output. This is Apache CloudStack, an

Review Request: CS-15425: Clicking on "About" button - Message refers to CloudStack instead of CloudPlatform(p1)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5811/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Brian Federle. Description --- 1. Log in

RE: Review Request: CS-13376:Vm is stuck in Stopping state when MS is rebooted after the stop command was issued, but answer wasn't recieved from the backend yet

Thanks for providing the patch. But this patch may introduce race condition in clustered management servers. Consider below situation. 1. two management servers 2. M1 stop a VM , VM is stopped in backend, the StopCommand haven't return, so the VM is still in Stopping Status. 3. restart M2, M2 s

Re: [DISCUSS] tools directory

On 07/06/2012 01:31 PM, David Nalley wrote: On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Robert Schweikert wrote: On 07/06/2012 12:54 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: I understood GCC to have a AL 2.0 license and to be used by the UI, as described in [1]. So it should at least be acceptable per license. I don't

Cloudstack event, "CloudStack Developer Day" in Japan

Hello We will have an event to introduce the detail architecture of CloudStack, how to use CloudStack API, customize CloudStack UI, setup dev environment, etc.. on July 21th in Tokyo. All session will be held in English with Japanese simultaneous interpretation. If you are interested in this ev

Re: [DISCUSS] tools directory

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Robert Schweikert wrote: > On 07/06/2012 12:54 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: >> >> I understood GCC to have a AL 2.0 license and to be used by the UI, as >> described in [1]. So it should at least be acceptable per license. I >> don't see why it has to be kept in the s

RE: Docs: Management server prereqs question

I don't see how there is a capability issue. At one time we had problems with people not having enough space to uncompress the downloaded system VM template during install time. We added prereqs to help avoid that problem. But I don't see how to justify 250 GB. > -Original Message- >

Re: [DISCUSS] systemvms

On Jul 6, 2012, at 8:25 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Correct! Due to licensing we are however not allowed to distribute it in the > official releases. But we can always write a script: > > $ cloud-download-and-install-systemvm /srv/my-secondary-storage > > If URL is not specified it will dow

Re: Review Request: cs-15388: New Compute offering window is missing the required values for CPU and RAM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5795/#review8918 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Federle On July 6, 2012, 4:39 a.m., Pran

Re: [DISCUSS] systemvms

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: > I had mentioned this concern (licensing and system VM presence) in the > earliest Apache discussions, and I included it in the CloudStack project > proposal at [1]. I had been told that it was a non-issue. That is, as long > as the code in

Re: [DISCUSS] tools directory

On 07/06/2012 12:54 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: I understood GCC to have a AL 2.0 license and to be used by the UI, as described in [1]. So it should at least be acceptable per license. I don't see why it has to be kept in the source tree but a removal of it should also include build changes to

RE: [DISCUSS] systemvms

I had mentioned this concern (licensing and system VM presence) in the earliest Apache discussions, and I included it in the CloudStack project proposal at [1]. I had been told that it was a non-issue. That is, as long as the code in our repo is of allowed license this dependency is fine, and

RE: [DISCUSS] tools directory

Anthony, would you be able to reach out to the Xen Community to see if they will take this upstream, or introduce a config that allows it to be disabled? -kevin > -Original Message- > From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 12:56 PM > To: clouds

RE: [DISCUSS] tools directory

I understood GCC to have a AL 2.0 license and to be used by the UI, as described in [1]. So it should at least be acceptable per license. I don't see why it has to be kept in the source tree but a removal of it should also include build changes to download a known-stable version for use in t

RE: Licensing: libvirt-java (from RBD thread)

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 9:06 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Licensing: libvirt-java (from RBD thread) > > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > Since the RBD thre

Re: Review Request: [Defect / Enhancement / New Feature] CS-15281 : Removal of third party dependencies in Citrix code base

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote: > Hi David, > > Let me understand the requirement properly. Please let me know do I have to > remove Paramiko completely or do I have to call Paramiko from somewhere else. > > The patch I sent already will remove Paramiko completely fr

Re: Licensing: libvirt-java (from RBD thread)

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Since the RBD thread was spinning out of control I figured it would be best > to start a new thread: > > "Wido: perhaps you could produce some packages for testing? at least .debs? > > --David" > > I've been doing that today. I can now g

RE: Review Request: [Defect / Enhancement / New Feature] CS-15281 : Removal of third party dependencies in Citrix code base

Hi David, Let me understand the requirement properly. Please let me know do I have to remove Paramiko completely or do I have to call Paramiko from somewhere else. The patch I sent already will remove Paramiko completely from the code base. Thanks, Pradeep.S -Original Message- From:

Review Request: CS-15478: UI cosmetic bug, empty buttons/viewAll section.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5808/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang. Description -

Re: [DISCUSS] systemvms

On 07/06/2012 01:04 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: On 7/5/12 11:58 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: Right now you have to download this weird qcow2 from the CS website, but that should be different I think: You set up CloudStack, configure your zone and then it will ask you to provide the System VM

Re: First review of RBD support for primary storage

On 07/05/2012 11:34 PM, Senner, Talin wrote: Awesomeness Wido. +10. I'd be happy to do any testing on my Ubuntu 12.04 cluster + ceph .48... Testing is needed. Be aware, on Ubuntu 12.04 there is the bug with libvirt and the secrets. If you run into problems, check if libvirtd is linked aga

Licensing: libvirt-java (from RBD thread)

Since the RBD thread was spinning out of control I figured it would be best to start a new thread: "Wido: perhaps you could produce some packages for testing? at least .debs? --David" I've been doing that today. I can now generate a libvirt-java debian package which should work on Debian and

Re: First review of RBD support for primary storage

First: Thanks for reviewing! On 07/06/2012 12:54 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: I took a first glance at this. Really pleased about this feature. EBS-like scalable primary storage is within reach! A few comments: 1. I see quite a few blocks of code ( > 20 times?) that are like if (pool.get

Re: Review Request: Small stop-gap fix to include cloud-elb.jar and cloud-netapp.jar in the rpms

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5805/#review8916 --- Ship it! Thanks for the patch. Applied - David Nalley On July 6, 2

Re: Review Request: Fix removed package statement is S3CopyObjectRequest

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5803/#review8915 --- Ship it! Applied - sorry that you had to patch this. --David - Dav

Re: signing off patches

git commit has a --author argument http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-commit.html --David On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: >>-Original Message- >>From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:prasanna.santha...@citrix.com] >>Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 4:39

Review Request: CS-15430 Create snapshot should fail if creating snapshot results in exceeding snapshot resource limit for domain-admin or user accounts.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5806/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- Change: 1. Before creating t

Review Request: Small stop-gap fix to include cloud-elb.jar and cloud-netapp.jar in the rpms

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5805/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- See https://reviews.apache.o

Review Request: cloud-vmware.jar needs to be in the system vm for the PremiumSecondaryStorageResource to work

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5804/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- PremiumSecondaryStorageResou

RE: signing off patches

>-Original Message- >From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:prasanna.santha...@citrix.com] >Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 4:39 PM >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: signing off patches > >On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 07:01:58AM -0400, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: >> >> After reviewing p

Re: Review Request: Fix removed package statement is S3CopyObjectRequest

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5803/#review8914 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Rajesh Battala On July 6, 2012, 11:39 a.m., Hu

Review Request: Fix removed package statement is S3CopyObjectRequest

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5803/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- package statement was remove

Review Request: Implementation of 3 ec2 commands: ec2-create-tags, ec2-delete-tags and ec2-decribe-tags. Component: AWSAPI.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5802/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle. Description --- Adding supp

Re: signing off patches

On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 07:01:58AM -0400, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > After reviewing patches on *review board* downloaded the patch using > "Download Diff". The downloaded patch removes the author > information. > Is it the right way to download patch or is there some problem with > the downloa

signing off patches

After reviewing patches on *review board* downloaded the patch using "Download Diff". The downloaded patch removes the author information. Is it the right way to download patch or is there some problem with the download functionality ? -abhi

Simple Build failures on master

The CloudStack Simple_build has been failing on jenkins since last night : http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/Simple_build/623/console But the emails aren't going out to the list. David - do we subscribe jenk...@cloudstack.org to the dev list? Thanks, -- Prasanna.,

Review Request: cs-15401- Disjunct Arrow in Network Screen only in Japnese UI in the advanced networking mode

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5801/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Brian Federle. Description --- When openi

Re: Review Request: CS-13376:Vm is stuck in Stopping state when MS is rebooted after the stop command was issued, but answer wasn't recieved from the backend yet

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5767/#review8913 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhinandan Prateek On July 5, 2012, 3:05 p.m.,

Re: Review Request: CS-13376:Vm is stuck in Stopping state when MS is rebooted after the stop command was issued, but answer wasn't recieved from the backend yet

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5767/#review8912 --- Ship it! ok - Abhinandan Prateek On July 5, 2012, 3:05 p.m., Prana

Review Request: PremiumSecondaryStorageResource should be part of core and not of the vmware plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5797/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- PremiumSecondaryStorageResou