On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Frank Zhang wrote:
> I noticed a nic is associated with ReservationStrategy where
> ReservationStrategy is :
> public enum ReservationStrategy {
> PlaceHolder, Create, Start, Managed;
> }
>
> What does each strategy mean?
> Create -- does it mean the
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Mike McClurg wrote:
> I just checked the XenServer API bindings for Java, and it seems that
> we've dual-licensed them under the LGPLv2 and Apache v2.0 licenses.
> Are there different XenServer API bindings for Java that are licensed
> differently, that I'm not awa
> ReservationStrategy controls when IP address of the nic is allocated and
> released
>
> PlaceHolder - used as a marker to identify place holder NIC used by
> ExternalLB/Firewall device
> Create - IP address assigned to the NIC stays across start/stop
> sessions
> Start - IP add
ReservationStrategy controls when IP address of the nic is allocated and
released
PlaceHolder - used as a marker to identify place holder NIC used by
ExternalLB/Firewall device
Create - IP address assigned to the NIC stays across start/stop sessions
Start - IP address is
David Nalley just shared LEGAL-135 with you
Asking for Legal review of WTFPL license used in jquery.timers.
> Is the WTFPL license acceptable
> ---
>
> Key: LEGAL-135
> URL: https://issue
Hi, Kevin.
Andrew's experience seems to gel with that, so far. Only a quirk
about listAll, which seems harmless.
http://code.google.com/p/jclouds/issues/detail?id=927
-A
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> Adrian, do you have specific list calls that are not backwards compat
Adrian, do you have specific list calls that are not backwards compatible from
3.0.x to 2.2.x?I thought we had made the end-user API backwards compatible
(assuming IDs are strings...).
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: fernc...@gmail.com [mailto:fernc...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
I noticed a nic is associated with ReservationStrategy where
ReservationStrategy is :
public enum ReservationStrategy {
PlaceHolder, Create, Start, Managed;
}
What does each strategy mean?
Create -- does it mean the nic is just created because it's owner VM is being
created? I w
>
> I suspect we'll have similar issues around vmware - which incidentally
> I didn't see in that list. I'll go add that now.
>
> --David
So on the page - VMware Infrastructure Java API is listed - which is
vijava.sourceforge.net - but unless something has changed really
recently - that's not what
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
> On 05/17/2012 01:26 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks:
>>
>> I saw the recent changes to the dependency license page[1] and wanted
>> to discuss XAPI API - which I think is the xenserver-java package. I
>> don't think this is in any
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
>
> I know David mentioned he maintains a Fedora package, but this didn't sound
> like a straight forward undertaking.
Robert:
If you are interested, you can find my spec here:
http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/xenserverjava.spec
--David
The existing EULA and logo should be removed. This is just one of those TODO
we did not get to yet but we have already begun to setup processes to removing
that along with rest of the potential thirdparty incompatible libraries
CloudStack still be may using at this moment.
Will
-Original
I've noticed Andrew Bayer working on this today on freenode irc #jclouds
Apparently, the shift of ids from numeric to opaque string means we have a
choice of either apologizing and changing 2.x code to use strings or a
potentially massive copy paste into a new version tree.
Also he noted some lis
> -Original Message-
> From: Murali Reddy [mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 10:16 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: basic zone for public clouds
>
> >
> >
> >
> >> When EIP feature is enabled, all tenant instances automatically get a
On 05/18/2012 02:03 PM, David Nalley wrote:
Hi Robert,
If you check the actual source, you will find ASLv2 headers.
The page you discovered has a typo, 3.1 should be 3.0.1
And the license, EULA file is an artifact of Citrix commercial version, and
should be removed.
If no one steps up I will
In one of my project we build the project with maven (instate of ant) and
we have some plugin like http://code.google.com/p/maven-license-plugin/
So we can address licence issue module by module (automaticly add/change
licence on code header )
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Nalley w
Hi Robert,
If you check the actual source, you will find ASLv2 headers.
The page you discovered has a typo, 3.1 should be 3.0.1
And the license, EULA file is an artifact of Citrix commercial version, and
should be removed.
If no one steps up I will happily defenestrate all of that Citrix li
That makes sense. So both assigning a public IP directly to the SSVM/CPVM
and public IP backed by EIP are possible.
I could be wrong, but still think that this will be against the notion of
basic networking zone. Unlike advanced mode where all zone Vlan's need to
be trunked,in this case just for e
I am not a lawyer, but
As I ran a diff between the 3.0.1 tarball and the recently released
3.0.2 tarball I stumbled across a license issue. Having already built
3.0.1 packages in OBS I might be in trouble already, but I didn't read
it all and figured I'd ask some questions first.
The sou
Anybody using jclouds to interact with CloudStack?
Currently jclouds does not support CloudStack 3.0
I've raised an enhancement request [1]
If you are interested (or can help out jclouds with this), please
contribute.
My own interest is in being able to use Apache Whirr to launch Apache
Hadoop on
On 5/18/12 10:16 AM, "Murali Reddy" wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> When EIP feature is enabled, all tenant instances automatically get a
>>> public IP that is 1:1 NAT to their RFC1918 IP.
>>
>>Is it true for SSVM and CPVM as well? If so, it will be a minor change
>>for SSVM and CPVM to hand out the public
>
>
>
>> When EIP feature is enabled, all tenant instances automatically get a
>> public IP that is 1:1 NAT to their RFC1918 IP.
>
>Is it true for SSVM and CPVM as well? If so, it will be a minor change
>for SSVM and CPVM to hand out the public IP backed by EIP to support the
>feature Murali asks.
We're not looking for a message queue, we're looking for a notifications system
ala AWS SNS. CloudStack needs to be able to *push* events out to endpoints; not
send them to an MQ for interested parties to pull.
-George
On May 18, 2012, at 12:09 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> While embedding the
While embedding the publisher inside CloudStack could be one way to go, it is
probably more immediately useful if we push events to a popular queueing system
such as AMQP?
Having CS have its own unique way of publishing events does make it more work
for others to utilize these events.
Agree on h
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
> On 05/17/2012 01:26 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks:
>>
>> I saw the recent changes to the dependency license page[1] and wanted
>> to discuss XAPI API - which I think is the xenserver-java package. I
>> don't think this is in any
On 05/17/2012 01:26 AM, David Nalley wrote:
Hi folks:
I saw the recent changes to the dependency license page[1] and wanted
to discuss XAPI API - which I think is the xenserver-java package. I
don't think this is in any of the currently targeted distributions.
And I just learned that this is C
> Are there any use-cases for which it make sense to have publishers (that use
> CloudStack API to publish) other than CloudStack? If its not overkill we can
> have generic mechanism of publish/subscribe as service in CloudStack. I can
> think of tenants workload VM's be able to leverage this and
On 05/18/2012 10:20 AM, Mike McClurg wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
On 05/18/2012 06:49 AM, Mike McClurg wrote:
These bindings are autogenerated, which is why there is no source
repository for them. The license on the API bindings generation code
is GPLv2, so
On 05/17/2012 05:29 PM, David Nalley wrote:
[lots of snippage below]
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
A release a month does not work for packagers. With CloudStack code being
open source it can be included in distributions. If there is a release every
month packagers
On 05/17/2012 05:57 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
On May 17, 2012, at 2:29 PM, David Nalley wrote:
[lots of snippage below]
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
My suggestion would be to go with a 6 month time based release cycle and
also decide on a version numbering scheme.
Hi Mohammad Nour,
I've acknowledged receipt of an ICLA from Alex Huang:
Dear Alex Huang,
This message acknowledges receipt of your ICLA, which has been filed
in the Apache Software Foundation records.
If you have been invited as a committer, please advise the project
PMC that your ICLA h
Hi Craig...
Thanks a lot for your explanation. I will proceed with that.
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
> Hi Mohammad Nour,
>
> I've acknowledged receipt of an ICLA from Alex Huang:
>
> Dear Alex Huang,
>
> This message acknowledges receipt of your ICLA, which has been
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
> On 05/18/2012 06:49 AM, Mike McClurg wrote:
>> These bindings are autogenerated, which is why there is no source
>> repository for them. The license on the API bindings generation code
>> is GPLv2, so I don't see any reason why we couldn'
On 05/18/2012 06:49 AM, Mike McClurg wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:20 AM, David Nalley wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
David, I had assumed that we could just get this library released under AL2 and
bundle the jar with CloudStack. It'd be great if distros pic
You mean for something like enStratus to send one of its events to CloudStack
to publish via the CloudStack event notifications?
I don't think so. I think it's best to keep this dead simple. Just notify
interested party of CloudStack events, and I'd even start simple there with
just state chang
Are there any use-cases for which it make sense to have publishers (that
use CloudStack API to publish) other than CloudStack? If its not overkill
we can have generic mechanism of publish/subscribe as service in
CloudStack. I can think of tenants workload VM's be able to leverage this
and publish
Are there any use-cases for which it make sense to have publishers (that
use CloudStack API to publish) other than CloudStack? If its not overkill
we can have generic mechanism of publish/subscribe as service in
CloudStack. I can think of tenants workload VM's be able to leverage this
and publish
Hi Ram...
I still can not find the signed ICLA of Murali Reddy.
Please do not include more than one signed ICLA in one file, I don't
believe this will work. Would you please check about that, and if needed
resend it. Looking forward to your reply.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Ram Chinta
Here's the way event pub sub should work…
People interested in events will subscribe to them via API and CloudStack will
maintain a record that includes:
* What type of event(s) the subscriber cares about
* The URI of an endpoint to notify on events
* An optional API key for signing event public
Hi Kelven...
I've just sent an account creation request taking into account your
usernames/id(s) preference.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Kelven Yang wrote:
> Hi Mohammad,
>
> For some reason my name is not in green(kelven.y...@citrix.com), my pick
> of usernames are as,
>
> kelveny
> ke
Hi Ram...
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Ram Chinta wrote:
> Mohammad,
> Murali Reddy's ICLA can be found in the same pdf that has Nitin and
> Kishan. I can resend if you are unable to locate it.
>
> Janardhana Reddy can be taken off the list.
>
Can you please more clear about that ? Do you m
Hi Edison...
An account creation request has been sent taking your usernames/id(s)
preferences into account.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> Hi Mohammad,
>
> My prefer usernames are:
>
> Edison
>
> Edison.SU
>
> sudison
>
> ** **
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:20 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
>> David, I had assumed that we could just get this library released under AL2
>> and bundle the jar with CloudStack. It'd be great if distros picked it up
>> but that seems more diffic
Please look at [1] in the mailing lists section, and to subscribe you need
to follow this rule:
For example cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org you subscribe by sending an
empty e-mail to cloudstack-dev-subscr...@incubator.apache.org
The same goes with other mailing lists. See you around on the
Hi Anthony...
As you indicated in your filed ICLA, you prefer 'anthony.xu' to be your
username/id, but this does not follow the required format. would
'anthonyxu' be OK for you ?
Looking forward to your reply
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi Anthony...
>
>
Please read below :)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mohammad Nour El-Din
Date: Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: CloudStack CLA
To: Alex Huang
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org, Craig L Russell <
craig.russ...@sun.com>
Hi Alex...
The ICLA you attached in this
Hi Alex...
The ICLA you attached in this e-mail is different than the on filed. For
me I have no problem. But I would like to know for sure which one to use as
a reference cause in the one attached to this e-mail you use your personal,
while the filed one you use Citrix e-mail which is the one
Hi Alena...
Apologies for the delay and thanks for giving me all the information I
need. You new account creation request has been sent.
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi...
>
>Thanks for your trust about sending me your ICLA, but I can not do
> this, you s
More patches - sorry I missed this one.
-- Forwarded message --
From: CrackerJackMack
Date: Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:45 PM
Subject: [CloudStack] Allow management networks with additional routes (#9)
that are not the default gateway to manage cloudstack VM hosts.
You can merge th
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:09 AM, John Kinsella wrote:
> On May 17, 2012, at 10:57 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:42 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
>>> I'd like to document the process for Apache CloudStack, as well...for this
>>> one I sent a pull request to CloudStack on github,
On May 17, 2012, at 10:57 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:42 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
>> I'd like to document the process for Apache CloudStack, as well...for this
>> one I sent a pull request to CloudStack on github, but I suspect that
>> process is going to change in the com
51 matches
Mail list logo
