I've noticed Andrew Bayer working on this today on freenode irc #jclouds Apparently, the shift of ids from numeric to opaque string means we have a choice of either apologizing and changing 2.x code to use strings or a potentially massive copy paste into a new version tree.
Also he noted some list ops are incompatible, but that's easier than the domain model. -A On May 18, 2012 10:36 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Anybody using jclouds to interact with CloudStack? > Currently jclouds does not support CloudStack 3.0 > I've raised an enhancement request [1] > > If you are interested (or can help out jclouds with this), please > contribute. > > My own interest is in being able to use Apache Whirr to launch Apache > Hadoop on CloudStack 3.0 > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/jclouds/issues/detail?id=927 > > > -- > Chiradeep > >
