While embedding the publisher inside CloudStack could be one way to go, it is 
probably more immediately useful if we push events to a popular queueing system 
such as AMQP?
Having CS have its own unique way of publishing events does make it more work 
for others to utilize these events.
Agree on having a design that allows for other systems of notifications.

From: George Reese 
<george.re...@enstratus.com<mailto:george.re...@enstratus.com>>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 05:24:42 -0700
To: 
"cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org<mailto:cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>"
 
<cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org<mailto:cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>>
Cc: Nitin Mehta <nitin.me...@citrix.com<mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com>>, Kishan 
Kavala <kishan.kav...@citrix.com<mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com>>, Dean 
<cl...@tizatron.com<mailto:cl...@tizatron.com>>, Chiradeep Vittal 
<chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com<mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com>>
Subject: Re: Event Publish and Subscribe ( was perhaps Re: Cloudstack Questions 
)

Here's the way event pub sub should work…

People interested in events will subscribe to them via API and CloudStack will 
maintain a record that includes:

* What type of event(s) the subscriber cares about
* The URI of an endpoint to notify on events
* An optional API key for signing event publications

If you want it to be really rich, you allow for multiple notifications 
endpoints, including SMS and email.

When the existing event management system in CloudStack identifies a state 
change, it published it to a message queue.

A new CloudStack component is subscribed to the message queue and pulls the 
state change off. It then sends the event to all interested parties. It does 
not keep delivery state. It sends and forgets. The only thing resembling state 
is the counting of failures, eventually killing an endpoint that fails to often.

-George

On May 17, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:

Cloudstack already have a well-defined set of events, currently being used by 
the Usage module.
We can extend this to publish the events to registered listeners/subscribers.

Nitin,
  We should evaluate the google guava package for this purpose.

-abhi

-----Original Message-----
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 3:48 AM
To: 
cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org<mailto:cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Cc: Dean
Subject: Re: Event Publish and Subscribe ( was perhaps Re: Cloudstack
Questions )

+1.
This could also be used for example to update DNS records on a DNS server
whenever a VM is started / stopped in a network.
A subscriber to the event bus can do this, and potentially things like updating 
a
CMDB or an LDAP server.

The important caveat is that this will be asynchronous to the stuff happening
inside the management server: it has limited utility for doing stuff that  is
required to succeed before an API operation can succeed.
For example, if a VM start requires a NAT rule to be programmed on the
firewall before the start can be considered successful. You could write a event
bus subscriber that does this, but the management server would not know if
it was successful or not.

There's at least a couple of entry points:
1. com.cloud.utils.fsm.StateListener. Classes that implement this listener get
notified on finite state event transitions. Examples include VM start / stop 2.
com.cloud.network.element.NetworkElement. Classes that implement this
get notified of network state transitions. Examples include adding nics and
removing nics to/from a network.

I think the first question regarding monitoring VMs on the isolated VLAN had a
different origin though.
The intention there was to have a monitoring service (e.g., Nagios) reach into
the VM and monitor stuff like CPU, IO, or even applications.
The issue there was around network reachability.

--
Chiradeep



On 5/11/12 2:09 PM, "Adrian Cole" 
<adr...@jclouds.org<mailto:adr...@jclouds.org>> wrote:

+1

Makes sense to have pubsub.  Inside the java codebase, we could
consider a clean and idiomatic lib like guava which is easy to unit test.

http://codingjunkie.net/guava-eventbus/

Then, expose out-of-JVM hooks for any of the popular services people use.

-A
On May 11, 2012 1:58 PM, "Dean" <cl...@tizatron.com<mailto:cl...@tizatron.com>> 
wrote:

Cross reference to:



http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-
dev/201204.
mbox/browser

[ from: Marlon Davids ]
< munch >
2) How do we monitor VM's that are in Cloudstack when they are in
an
isolated VLAN does
anyone have a clever workaround?
3) Has anyone developed a script for parsing and alerting on
warning
events in the
management Log yet?

I would like to propose cloudstack consider a pub/sub model for event
handling to complement API calls like listEvents.

Polling can be problematic and sensitive to scaling.

A simple example would be state change on a physical device.  The
admin  server can simply publish a message on a network socket
indicating that the  device has changed it's state.

If a subscriber was interested in that device, it could make an api
call  to the admin server for state change information for that device only.
The
admin server may choose to validate that physical device against the
current state table in the database.

The API would reply that this node changed it's state from
Operational to  Prep For Maintenance.  (or whatever the transition
state would be)

The message exchange could be wrapped around vm states, resource
additions/removals etc.

Using a library like zeromq, a developer can write any number of
consumers  in any language they wanted to subscribe to the Event Bus.

Comments?

--
-Dean


--
George Reese - Chief Technology Officer, enStratus
e: george.re...@enstratus.com<mailto:george.re...@enstratus.com>    Skype: 
nspollution    t: @GeorgeReese    p: +1.207.956.0217
enStratus: Enterprise Cloud Management - @enStratus - 
http://www.enstratus.com<http://www.enstratus.com/>
To schedule a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/GeorgeReese

Reply via email to