t see what would be the added value here, the wrapping fn would only be
calling the protocol method.
Nothing else...
If you require more in your context then define your own wrapper.
Nothing generic can help you at this point... I think...
Luc P.
> I was just refering to the fact that the &#x
So far so good, will go in prod with it next Wednesday.
Will run some heavy integrated tests in the next 48 hours.
Will report if anything shows up.
Thank you,
Luc P.
> For my projects swapping 1.7.0-alpha4 -> alpha5 has not culminated in any
> abnormalities. So... looking good thus
with
ThrowableRecompose
* Added more tests for TTRACE-12
--
Luc Préfontaine
SoftAddicts inc.
Québec, Canada
Rabat, Morocco
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
implementations.
If someone comes up with a better
implementation while providing
the same behaviours as the current
str fn, then it should make it's way
maybe in clojure.string.
"fast-strings" ? Whatever it may be
named.
Luc P.
> Core fns should be simple, unsurprising, and general.
&g
Use (apply base-fun opts)
Luc P.
> I'm trying to define a couple of functions that support the same options,
> but return different return types.
>
> I have one function that is the "base" function that provides the most raw
> access, and some other functions th
course,
this was to increase my general
knowledge and to be more relaxed
on the job :)
Knowing your enemy is essential...
Luc P.
> On 16/03/14 18:24, Softaddicts wrote:
> > I think that significant optimizations have to be decided at a higher level.
> > I doubt that any of that can
r random access to memory.
This will probably shake the software
stack a lot. Which brings other issues...
Meanwhile we are stuck with
finding the least painful path to get
our stuff to run asap.
Luc P.
> From what I understand, a single core can easily saturate a memory bus. At
> the sa
make sure there's no missing
references, ...
But this is not used in interactive
development where you want to
redefine stuff, change states,
and be as dynamic as possible.
Do you have a specific need that
you want to cover ?
Luc P.
> Why are the toplevel forms which arent macros e
first
version written in Teco on tops-20.
In these times it was a vast improvement on line by line editing.
But I can't get back to it, the keyboard
shortcuts do not seem to fit in my
brain anymore. Years of WYSIWYG
probably shrank this brain function
to a bare minimum :)
Luc P.
>
>
was I writing a few seconds ago ?
Luc P.
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Cecil Westerhof
> wrote:
> > 2014-05-05 19:48 GMT+02:00 Brian Craft :
> >> I would never have guessed modularity as a reason to worry about security
> >> in fp.
> >>
> >> I w
getting them to participate on the
Clojure side of the fence.
But I may be old fashion...
Luc P.
> OK. this thread is a bit worrying. If I understand correctly, it means
> that we've now got inconsistent hash and equals functions. I suspect this
> hasn't bitten many
the new bindings evaled.
Leaving def unwrapped would get it
done at compilation time,
not at runtime.
Is this a bit clearer ?
Luc P.
>
> On Thursday, May 29, 2014 8:43:58 PM UTC-7, squeegee wrote:
> >
> >
> > On May 29, 2014, at 7:11 PM, ian.tegebo >
> > w
me
space switches while improving
or fixing code.
Luc P
> Hi everyone, I'm looking to get some opinions on code style.
>
> Specifically, I like to write my code in a top-down.
>
> What I mean by that is that within a file the highest-level functions sit
> at the top, and ar
o the readers of the
above lines, I could not resist :)))
Luc P.
> It takes a while (a couple months) to get used to reading things
> upside-down, but I wouldn't want to go back. Knowing with certainty that
> some called method is defined above in the compilation strategy simplifies
x27;s
voice here) else can do it :))
Luc P.
Luc P.
>
>
> On Wednesday, June 4, 2014 9:42:41 AM UTC-5, Mars0i wrote:
> >
> > ... Then I add the new functions to the declare statement by hand, or I
> > periodically do something like:
> >
> > grep defn
;s now their own
and that you should get lost.
I hope you stay anchored in the
real world :)))
Luc P.
> Sorry if that was already answered,
>
> Is there a possibility to get rid of this legalwall?
>
> I realize that there are good intents behind the existing practice, but it
Hopefully, we all knew it :))
And you should add that auto boxing
Is done on the literal, otherwise this
magic would not work.
Otherwise, Java would be the most
brittled language.
It probably is anyway :))
Luc P..
> The string concatenation operator in java calls 'toString'
Count me in,
Luc P.
> I'm considering putting together a screencast, or a series of screencasts,
> based on my Functional Web
> Architecture<http://skillsmatter.com/podcast/home/functional-web>
> talk.
> The base presentation would be improved, and I'd probably w
Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
&g
I meant collection ... not sequence.
Luc P.
> Strings are character sequences, count is a better option to stay
> within the sequence abstraction.
>
> Lic P.
>
>
> > count does some type checks, but it's negligible in most cases as I already
> > said.
No, no, I can assure you, it's not an
insult, you are well beyond.
:))) --> toward the edge of
the universe
Luc P
> Is that intended as some sort of an insult aimed at me? I'm just pointing
> out that "the web" != "everything that might conceivabl
o do it.
http://rotpier.over-blog.com/article-97207983.html
Luc P.
> I jumped on the FP bandwagon over a year ago and have been using Scala both
> at work and for personal interest. Recently however I decided to take a
> closer look at Clojure and see if it is something i actually
anguage and its related tools
make your job so complex that your
brain overloads then you are
shooting yourself in the foot.
Luc P.
> Do you guys have any concrete examples?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 23 Dec 2013, at 10:13, Korny Sietsma wrote:
>
> > This tie
?
Luc P.
--
Luc Prefontaine sent by ibisMail!
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
firs
This depends strictly on your learning speed which I will
not comment here :)
It took me three months full time to start to feel at ease with
Clojure writing production code and I was around 45 years
old at the time.
Learning is never inefficient... when you want to learn.
Luc P
>
get the prototype
working.
Choose carefully... :)
Luc P.
> The point is that Clojure is not the only modern language out there. I
> can't possibly learn them all in depth just to decide which language to use
> for my production code. That would be time-inefficient because my goa
.
Luc P.
> Then we have more in common
> than you may think :)
>
> I learned Ruby first, went through
> Scala which appeared in the same
> time frame,
> all this to pick up the language of
> choice to replace Java and Ruby
> which we used to prototype our
> produc
makes it easy to implement.
Versioning is mainly a way for us to
revert back to previous configs but it's
also a way to fake an immutable
config state. It's an operational
requirement more than a code
or design issue.
Luc P.
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Softaddicts
> wrote
missing
piece in the puzzle. Not sure that
this kind of book would be popular
these days.
Luc P.
> That makes me think that maybe there's a need for more books about Clojure.
> There are many introductory books but nothing more advanced such as best
> practices, patterns, etc...
&g
Been writing these on my iPhone most of the day and if I do not cut
lines myself, it looks pretty ugly
on my side :)
I am pretty bad at writing poetry,
glad to see I could fake at it :)
Luc P.
> Luc, I've just got to say, your tiny margin widths always make me think
> your message i
We added this as part of our standard
logging, not only when exceptions
are raised. It does help a lot in prod...
Luc P.
>
> On Dec 27, 2013, at 11:33 PM, guns wrote:
>
> > On Fri 27 Dec 2013 at 11:23:22PM -0500, Lee Spector wrote:
> >>
> >> On Dec
I would say use macros to avoid
hiding calls from the go macro
scope.
Luc P.
> I recently discovered that parking calls only work if they're directly
> contained within a go block. So this works fine:
>
> (defn foo [ch]
> (go
> (
> But this:
>
> (defn
You are trying to close a nil
channel.
W/O the code it's all I can say :)
Did you check to make sure
you are not trying to handle nil
as a channel ?
Luc P.
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting the following error over and over again in my code, I've tried
> adding in some print
data compliant with our
business model it simplifies the
support of these plugins.
Thank you, great idea :)
Luc P.
> Yesql is a simple library for blending SQL queries & Clojure together,
> cleanly. Here's how it
> works<https://github.com/krisajenkins/yesql#rationale&g
nic
on the look of the expansion,
the code shuffling is kind of
heavy.
Luc
> I do not have a single close! statement in my code anywhere. I've double
> checked with grep -lhr "close\!" . through my whole codebase and all the
> projects in it.
>
>
>
>
Just got your email, I remember
vaguely about this issue maybe when
Tim did is presentation at fhe
Conj.
Or maybe on the mailing list.
You may try what I described
in my previous email and make
your mind about this.
Luc P.
>
> I've changed all of the go blocks to thread and got a
Wrap the read in a try catch just return nil in the catch clause
for this specific exception and wrap it in a function for ease
of use. You might want to throw up any other exceptions and
only catch this one
Luc P.
> I should add: this problem arises due to cljs / clojure talking over
Oups, skipped the last part of your
emal. With edn I see no way to
do this.
Luc
> Either you misunderstood my question or I misunderstood your answer.
>
> I don't want the entire expression to return nil. I only want the
> _unparsable_ part to return nil.
>
> Thus, the
r w/o some deeper analysis :)))
Luc P.
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I'm not an expert in security but AFAIK this is not a problem. Every user
> input is a string and you chose how to parse it. There is a edn reader that
> is safe, but you can use specific parsers depending on the input
Just joking :)
There are a bunch of "golden rules"
that violate on a regular basis for
good reasons.
With some satisfaction I have to
confess.
When you have a
muti purpose tool in your hands
that you can bend to almost any
use it's hard to be restrained by
taboos :)
Luc P.
s approach.
Swapping the name space or adding
one to overload the default one
is quite practical.
The line by line annotation is a
painful approach to such changes and
should be only required in rare cases
(mixed operand computations ?)
Luc P.
Sent from my iPod
On 2010-06-20, at 6:39 AM, Ni
that choice depending on its purpose.
Luc P.
Sent from my iPod
On 2010-06-20, at 8:35 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On 19 June 2010 15:26, cageface wrote:
Maybe it's only because I'm coming from Ruby, in which number
promotion is automatic and everything is slow, but if I have to
choose
betw
ntrol they do not
need yet.
Luc P
Sent from my iPod
On 2010-06-22, at 12:44 AM, Mark Engelberg
wrote:
The new uber-loop is fantastic.
So I guess the main point still to be finalized is whether the default
arithmetic ops will auto-promote or error when long addition
overflows.
Playing a
rious
implementations provide plenty of
options to attain the nirvana of
high performance. That's good.
Lets just make things easy for the
average guy..,
Luc P
Sent from my iPod
On 2010-06-22, at 7:53 AM, Nicolas Oury wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Luc Préfontaine a>
As the implementor Rich, it's your
call as I said :))
If auto promotion brings in chaos
then lets drop it entirely.
If people want to eat elephants they can still choose to use directly
big number
implementations.
Luc P
Sent from my iPod
On 2010-06-22, at 10:46 AM, Rich Hickey
rtial renderings
provided by the plugin.
We just provide layouts and customize
CSS stuf.
We will give a closer look to
Compojure this year and see if can
achieve the same code ratio somehow.
Luc P
Sent from my iPod
On 2010-06-24, at 12:27, Daniel Gagnon wrote:
I don't use Cloju
ts to return to
java iterators now :)))
Luc P.
Sent from my iPod
On 2010-06-27, at 14:22, José Luis Romero wrote:
Hi! I am learning the core of clojure, and so far, I am loving it. But
I am not a lisp programmer (python, java, among others), but never
functional programming. I am practicing with c
r apps and establish
a common ground in the supporting
scripts we use.
It helps structuring the file space were
all our components reside in dev test
and prod.
Honestly, by the time this thread ends
on that simple and obvious matter,
Clojure 1.5 will be released...
Luc P.
Sent from my iPod
On
Yep, we have been using this for a
year or so and this solves the
classpath/jar file location issue nicely.
Hence the usefulness of CLOJURE_HOME and alikes to locate
this single folder from a very simple wrapper script...
Luc P.
Sent from my iPod
On 2010-07-01, at 10:29, Laurent PETIT wrote
folder.
Luc P
Sent from my iPod
On 2010-07-01, at 10:49, Paul Moore wrote:
On 1 July 2010 15:29, Laurent PETIT wrote:
Hello,
note that with java 6 you can specify at once to add all the jars
located in a directory:
java -cp "libs/*" clojure.main
and you can place any jar y
NSF documentation
and I am not convinced that the
red tape is minimal.
You certainly loose some flexibilty
by having to get scope changes
approved by them.
Anyone got involved with them ?
Luc P
Sent from my iPod
On 2010-07-07, at 14:49, David Blubaugh
wrote:
To All,
I am extremely intereste
Zack if you need help with this Rail
app let us now. We can give you a
hand, the wish list keeps growing :)))
Luc P.
Sent from my iPod
On 2010-07-09, at 15:07, zkim wrote:
Hi Justin, thanks again for the go-ahead to pull examples from
http://clojure-examples.appspot.com.
Zack, you had
.
We monitor the situation however
and will change our mind as soon
as it looks promiding...
Zack, keep the focus on the problem
to solve :)))
Luc P.
Sent from my iPod
On 2010-07-11, at 19:31, zkim wrote:
Rich-
It sounded to me like he was only saying that he's more familiar with
Ruby/
lifies it a
lot.
You cannot expect a tool to "guess" your project dependencies.
Dependencies are a fact of life and cannot be avoided in any significant
project.
It's not "gargage"...
--
Luc P.
The rabid Muppet
--
You received this message because
in day to day use by most of us.
You should get used to it or live as an hermit on some far away mountain.
Which I am tempted to do from time to time but for real bureaucratic
issues like income tax reports :)
Life can be hard...
Luc
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
ultranewb wrote:
&
he above did not ring a bell.
Hence the expectancy reset. Learn to live with it because there will not be a
solution as simple as the one you expect in the near future.
So much for FANPERV.. We should call this FAMUNE (FAilure to Meet Unrealistic
Newbie's Expectations :)
Luc
O
r.
Comments are welcomed. The TODO list is not yet published but we see a few
things we want to add to it especially
in the area of resource management and some optimizations.
Code wise I think it's not too horrible given that I had to squeeze this in my
already ultra-tight schedule in
the last
you have suggestions, they are welcomed. I saw DynaSpring but lacked
the time to go trough it throughly. I will have more time in the next month
to look at it deeper.
Thanx,
Luc P.
On Wed, 4 May 2011 02:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
Alessio Stalla wrote:
> On 4 Mag, 06:53, Luc Prefontaine wrote:
>
.
>
> Any help, tips, or insight would be very much appreciated on this
> one! Is there is a more appropriate group to address this question?
>
> Thanks so much!
> Dudaroo
>
--
Luc P.
The rabid Muppet
--
You received this message because you are su
Use:
(read-string (read-string "[{:a \"blah\" :b 23} {:d 34 :c \"hello\"}]")
I believe your expression is wrong, (:d should be {:d.
Luc P.
On Wed, 25 May 2011 18:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
ron peterson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I have a following string for example:
h)
> (> k m-v) (recur l (dec m))
> :else m)
>
> This bombs out with:
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: recur arg for primitive local: h
> must be matching primitive
>
> With 1.3.0-master-SNAPSHOT it works fine. Any ideas what I
boxed value.
No mystery here. Life should be simpler in 1.3 in numeric computations.
Luc P.
On Fri, 27 May 2011 13:31:46 +1000
Andreas Kostler wrote:
> The question is though, why doesn't this work to begin with and why
> does it work on 1.3.0-master-SNAPSHOT...? Is it brok
ed that this stuff was no accident.
It's an efficient thinking process and it's not restricted to my bath.
I remember mornings where I woke up and wrote solutions on paper,
they literally popped in my mind suddenly by the moment I woke up.
Luc P.
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 19:09:34 +0200
Brian Mari
onths aside from eventual
bug fixes.
The other features on the to do list can wait.
Luc P.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are mod
gt; (get (transient {:a 1}) :a)
1
user=> ((transient {:a 1}) :a)
1
user=> (get [1] 0)
1
user=> (get (transient [1]) 0)
1
user=> (get #{1} 1)
1
user=> (get (transient #{1}) 1)
nil <--- Oups...
user=>
Dunno if it is fixed in 1.3, no time to play with it these times.
--
L
And I thought my posts were long :)
Luc P.
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 19:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
nchubrich wrote:
> It did go on too long. I hope when someone \does read it, they will
> see I am not being wholly unreasonable.
>
> On Jul 6, 7:21 pm, Ken Wesson wrote:
> > On Wed,
in industry seriously
> considers Clojure for enterprise systems.
--
Luc P.
The rabid Muppet
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts
red "enterprise" then?
> >
> > On 10/07/2011, at 9:07 AM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> >
> >> In which case, apologies to Shree... but those lists don't really
> >> offer many companies that would generally be considered
> >> "enterprise&qu
Hey, if it does not take a year and an army of nuclear scientists to implement,
it would already
be better :
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:22:18 +0530
Vivek Khurana wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Luc Prefontaine
> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we should create somethi
No, use it any time you need an arbitrary symbol.
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 10:41:56 +0200
Kazimir Majorinc wrote:
> Is gensym used for anything in Clojure except for alpha-conversion in
> macros?
>
--
Luc P.
The rabid Muppet
--
You received this message becaus
binding without a
> > let?
> >
> > Question 2: What is the map {:added "1.0"} doing?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > cmn
>
--
Luc P.
The rabid Muppet
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Cloju
ot;x" is a different binding in each of the forms, not the same "x"
across forms.
Luc P.
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
octopusgrabbus wrote:
> If the function is called with one argument, what Clojure language
> rule allows x to appear outside the vector brack
We use 1.2 in prod with protocols... no need to wait for 1.3
Luc P.
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:52:01 -0400
Albert Cardona wrote:
> Chas,
>
> "It seems that relatively few people are taking advantage of some of
> Clojure’s most sophisticated and unique features: metadata; protocol
:doc
"Returns the value mapped to key, not-found or nil if key not present."}
works because a contains the fn object (get in this case).
If your intent is to get the meta data of an unnamed fn at runtime the above
solves your issue.
Luc P.
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
Tim
By string I mean human readable...
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:56:58 -0400
Luc Prefontaine wrote:
> # is a string representation of
> the fn object, not the object itself.
>
> user=> (def a get)
> #'user/a
> user=> (meta a)
> {:ns #, :name get, :file
> "
(defmacro choose [[c choices] & body]
`(choose* (fn [~c] ~@body) ~choices)) <--- not ~@, just ~
~@ expects a sequence result
In your first example, [:a :b :c] is a sequence but in the second example, y is
not.
body is a sequence (& body), using ~@ there is ok there.
Luc P.
On
features and now, apart from the occasional annoying red
> notification icon in Gmail, I can completely ignore it.
>
> Is it just a case of "ooh, shiny! Google released a new toy!" or is
> there actually some tangible useful benefit to a developer being on
> G+?
--
Luc P.
Use (declare ...) to declare vars not yet defined (vars include fns).
You will be able to preserve the presentation order you want.
This will also make it clear which "implementation details" are
defined in the same source file versus stuff imported from another
name space.
Luc P.
erent name spaces is even more work.
Luc P.
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 04:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
Jevgeni Holodkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Usually, when I write a program, I tend to organize the function to
> keep with higher abstraction on the top and the details implementation
> in the
deal with.
Divide to conquer they say... I think this division created faked walls that
slowed down improvements
in software in general.
Luc P.
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:22:13 -0400
daly wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 22:16 -0700, Sean Corfield wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:14
ource constraints, mobile apps,...)
Not having read-eval in this context is acceptable for a number of very good
reasons
as Rich explained.
But this does not mean that this recipe should be applied wall to wall to all
Clojure
implementations.
Luc P.
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 00:12:02 +1200
Mark Derr
in the 1980s/90s in low level libraries and in resource constrained environments
(bank tellers, ...)
Being able to use Java libs from Clojure in the same fashion is valuable.
No one would like to rewrite all the Java libs in Clojure or any other
of today's high level language. It's simply
You can lower the values. I changed them to -Xmx1G -Xms1G
There was not enough memory on my machine to meet these values.
My next laptop will have 8Gigs of RAM but now I am topped to 4Gigs...
Luc P.
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:53:06 -0400
Tamreen Khan wrote:
> I've removed the first t
No need to wait in desperation for this, just add a filter rule in your email
client
to send these to trash directly. I have a couple of these and it saves me a
significant
# of frustrating hours :)
Luc P.
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
pmbauer wrote:
> These "unhappy"
that's a breeze compared to the hell we
went through with the
build process before jumping in the Leiningen wagon.
Luc P.
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:49:42 -0700
Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Michal B
> wrote:
> > Why does it have to be so complicated to use
have created something as coherent as Clojure.
It's entirely up to you to live with hairy dependency problems if you wish so.
Choose your own hell, use Maven as-is, Ant or even manage you dependencies by
hand with -cp .... when starting the JVM.
Luc P.
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:23:08 +0
od track record decision wise + an
astounding achievements.
Stop hammering on him and if you are not happy with Clojure, find another
language
that matches your aspirations. They are plenty out there.
Luc P.
daly wrote:
>
>
> Try to see the situation from the lead developer pe
s about 28kb (5kb
> zipped) in advanced mode for a simple example.
>
--
Luc P.
The rabid Muppet
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note tha
buzz. It's nearly 700 lines. Not sure
you would
like to code that directly in JavaScript:) (I would not)
Luc P.
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:21:08 +0300
Sergey Didenko wrote:
> Yes, after compiling this example and its raw Google Closure
> equivalent:
>
> (ns bgcolor
> (:r
Hi Rich,
Zero footprint ?
If you ever approach that goal I suggest a name change like ClojureRTA (Clojure
Running on Thin Air:))
Luc P.
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 20:25:43 -0400
Rich Hickey wrote:
> That said, it is our intention to look at minimizing the base
> footprint as far as we ca
otherwise.
I rarely now type code to call a function without the required parenthesis.
The advantage here is that most of the time you have less code lines to deal
with
compared to its Java equivalent.
Luc P.
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 15:19:05 -0700
Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 201
that once you require a name space, is entirely loaded so the
explicit narrowing of function used
looks to me an overkill. Especially if you have an alias in your require call.
There's no possible confusion with
an alias and calls are can easily be searched as text strings which all IDEs
l play with this in the next couple of days.
Luc
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:26:03 -0800
Mark Engelberg wrote:
> I can relate to Denis' issue. I find it pretty common to have a
> common set of dependencies across every file in a project. Copying
> and pasting this header to every
You are missing the robert hook library.
https://github.com/technomancy/robert-hooke
This is used by leiningen and should be installed as part of the leiningen
install.
Did you do a clean reinstall of leinigen with the windows dist to ensure you
have all the pieces ?
Luc P.
On Wed, 17 Aug
Or you could use Boing to create your data source and hide most of that wiring
away from your code.
I am doing a sales pitch here for my own stuff :)))
https://github.com/lprefontaine/Boing/blob/master/examples/spring-1-to-boing.clj
Luc P.
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 03:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
"M
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:19:46 -0400
Alexandre Patry wrote:
Some reading:
http://david-mcneil.com/post/1475458103/implementation-inheritance-in-clojure
Luc P.
> Hi,
>
> I would like to define a protocol as a super set of another. For
> example:
>
> (defprotoc
tocol to change them. It's not inheritance, it's overriding
implementations.
Luc P.
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:42:46 -0400
Alexandre Patry wrote:
>
> On 2011-08-28, at 2:27 PM, Luc Prefontaine wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:19:46 -0400
> > Alexandre Pa
If I recall correctly, #^String is the "old" type hint syntax. Can't remember
when the change
occurred however.
The later (^String) is the syntax to use.
Luc P.
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
yeejlan wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Here is what I did:
>
> us
Look at this:
http://clojure.org/contributing
Luc P.
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 04:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Ralph Moritz wrote:
> Hi Clojurians!
>
> I created my first JIRA issue today (CLJ-834), but I didn't assign it
> to anyone, because I didn't know who to assign it to! Also, I
quot;Returns the meaningful "blblblbl..." string.
It expects a single parameter, the length of the returned string"
[length]
...)
You can describe the expected inputs and the result, ...
Do the same thing with your name space definitions, protocols. ...
It's easy, fits with your
201 - 300 of 392 matches
Mail list logo
