On 26.02.2009, at 08:47, Jeff Valk wrote:
> String representation obviously uses :type now in a very particular
> way. I'm not sure where this happens though. Can anyone shed some
> light on the details?
print-method now dispatches on type, rather than class as it did
before. There is no d
On 26.02.2009, at 01:51, Rich Hickey wrote:
> You raise interesting issues and I'd like to explore them further. I'm
> not sure the issues you have with type-tag-or-class dispatch are all
> that prohibitive. In any case, I've added a type function that returns
> the :type metadata or the class if
2009/2/26 Konrad Hinsen
>
> On 26.02.2009, at 01:51, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> > You raise interesting issues and I'd like to explore them further. I'm
> > not sure the issues you have with type-tag-or-class dispatch are all
> > that prohibitive. In any case, I've added a type function that returns
Hi all.
First. For those who remember, I posted an individual-based model in
this group some time ago (eden.clj), and got some very helpful replies
on where I misunderstood clojure and did things the hard way. I wanted
to report that that model by now is written purely as nonblocking
agents, and
Hi Onorio
RC1-147 requires the use of Clojure's latest snapshot (can be obtained
from the SVN).
-Itay
On Feb 26, 4:21 am, Onorio Catenacci wrote:
> Hi Itay (and everyone else),
>
> Every time I try to run Waterfront I keep running into the same
> error. On line 83 of kit.clj the assertion f
On Feb 26, 2009, at 1:51, Rich Hickey wrote:
> You raise interesting issues and I'd like to explore them further. I'm
> not sure the issues you have with type-tag-or-class dispatch are all
> that prohibitive. In any case, I've added a type function that returns
> the :type metadata or the class i
I am trying to do the equivalent of a syntax-quote (converting
unqualified symbols to namespace-qualified symbols) inside a macro,
but it seems there is no built-in function to do this. Am I
overlooking something?
At the moment I am using the following function, which does a syntax-
quote
On Feb 26, 3:02 am, "Stephen C. Gilardi" wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2009, at 6:47 PM, Itay Maman wrote:
>
> > This version is fully functional and so far I didn't encounter any
> > bugs.
> > I guess that over the course of the next few days, as people start
> > using this version,
> > a few issues may
On Feb 26, 2009, at 12:30, Itay Maman wrote:
> In Java6 @Override can also be attached to a method that overrides an
> interface-declared method. So, the code is not supposed to compile w/
> a Java5 compiler. As for the Java6 compiler, my guess is that your
> compile is configured to be Java5 com
Hi Boris,
> (doseq [e [retire-host slowdown-host infect-hosts naturalrecovery-
> host pair-host breakup-host] i world]
> (send-off (agent nil) (fn [_] (e i))
>
> There doesn't seem to be any concurrency happening, and the whole
> thing just slows down to not doing much at all.
Th
On Feb 26, 2009, at 12:26, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> At the moment I am using the following function, which does a syntax-
> quote for a single symbol:
>
> (defn symbol-in-current-ns
>[s]
>(symbol (str *ns*) (str s)))
Of course that should better be
(defn qualified-symbol
[s]
(let [s
On Feb 26, 6:10 am, Itay Maman wrote:
> Hi Onorio
>
> RC1-147 requires the use of Clojure's latest snapshot (can be obtained
> from the SVN).
>
I figured that was probably the case but I thought you might want to
know about the assertion failure in case it were some other issue.
--
Onorio
--~--
On Feb 26, 4:00 am, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> On 26.02.2009, at 01:51, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> > You raise interesting issues and I'd like to explore them further. I'm
> > not sure the issues you have with type-tag-or-class dispatch are all
> > that prohibitive. In any case, I've added a type funct
On Feb 26, 4:17 am, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> 2009/2/26 Konrad Hinsen
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 26.02.2009, at 01:51, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> > > You raise interesting issues and I'd like to explore them further. I'm
> > > not sure the issues you have with type-tag-or-class dispatch are all
> > > that proh
super slick, I love it!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...
On Feb 26, 6:19 am, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2009, at 1:51, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> > You raise interesting issues and I'd like to explore them further. I'm
> > not sure the issues you have with type-tag-or-class dispatch are all
> > that prohibitive. In any case, I've added a type func
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Brian Will wrote:
>
> I'm a bit mystified how syntax quote does what it does. I don't see
> how syntax quote can quote the whole while unquoting parts without
> some evaluation-time intervention. If I had to implement it myself,
> I'd just punt the problem to eval
On Feb 26, 2:11 pm, Onorio Catenacci wrote:
> On Feb 26, 6:10 am, Itay Maman wrote:
>
> > Hi Onorio
>
> > RC1-147 requires the use of Clojure's latest snapshot (can be obtained
> > from the SVN).
>
> I figured that was probably the case but I thought you might want to
> know about the assertio
On Feb 26, 2:02 pm, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2009, at 12:30, Itay Maman wrote:
>
> > In Java6 @Override can also be attached to a method that overrides an
> > interface-declared method. So, the code is not supposed to compile w/
> > a Java5 compiler. As for the Java6 compiler, my guess
Thanks for the reply Timothy! I'll look into the future things :).
The main reason for using refs was because I am constructing a contact
network between different refs (a graph, consisting of nodes and
edges.), which changes over time (all the short-term and long-term
relations between hosts bei
On Feb 25, 8:02 pm, Mark Engelberg wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Stuart Halloway
>
> > I believe it would be simpler to leave out this footnote. In my
> > perfect world, seq/ISeq/sequence are synonyms, and nillability is a
> > property only of *functions*: seq and next.
>
> I unders
2009/2/26 Itay Maman
>
>
>
> On Feb 26, 2:02 pm, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> > On Feb 26, 2009, at 12:30, Itay Maman wrote:
> >
> > > In Java6 @Override can also be attached to a method that overrides an
> > > interface-declared method. So, the code is not supposed to compile w/
> > > a Java5 compile
2009/2/26 Rich Hickey
>
>
>
> On Feb 26, 4:17 am, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> > 2009/2/26 Konrad Hinsen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 26.02.2009, at 01:51, Rich Hickey wrote:
> >
> > > > You raise interesting issues and I'd like to explore them further.
> I'm
> > > > not sure the issues you have with
On Feb 26, 12:00 am, dmiller wrote:
> Regarding the Sequential interface:
>
> There are a number of places where (x instanceof Sequential) is taken
> to imply something else about x:
>
> (a) that casting in the form of ((IPersistentCollection)x) is okay,
> or
> (b) that RT.seq(x) will succe
Would it make sense to make instance?/type-instance?/type .. multimethods
themselves ?
2009/2/26 Konrad Hinsen
>
> On 26.02.2009, at 01:51, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> > You raise interesting issues and I'd like to explore them further. I'm
> > not sure the issues you have with type-tag-or-class disp
On Feb 26, 8:30 am, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> 2009/2/26 Rich Hickey
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 26, 4:17 am, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> > > 2009/2/26 Konrad Hinsen
>
> > > > On 26.02.2009, at 01:51, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> > > > > You raise interesting issues and I'd like to explore them further.
> > I'm
>
Hi Jim,
On Feb 25, 6:38 pm, jim wrote:
> I've just uploaded a file that has the Mini-Kanren logic programming
> system described in "The Reasoned Schemer" implemented in idiomatic
> Clojure. The file is:
>
> http://clojure.googlegroups.com/web/mini_kanren.clj
>
I'm still reading my way through
Hello,
While not checking types at compile time, it seems to me that a lot of
clojure code still needs in the docstring some sort of "preconditions
warnings".
For example, that you can't pass a first argument if it cannot be callable
as a function, or if it cannot succeed the (seq) test ...
Could
2009/2/26 Rich Hickey
>
>
>
> On Feb 26, 8:30 am, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> > 2009/2/26 Rich Hickey
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 26, 4:17 am, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> > > > 2009/2/26 Konrad Hinsen
> >
> > > > > On 26.02.2009, at 01:51, Rich Hickey wrote:
> >
> > > > > > You raise interesting i
Very interesting ideas, everyone... thanks a lot for the input.
Yeah, I recognize that each case is going to be different - I guess I
was just looking for suggestions on how to manage it. Which I found...
Comp and partial look particularly interesting. Thanks!
-Luke
On Feb 25, 5:09 pm, Kevin Do
Hello.
Simplest way to run empty REPL is to create empty Clojure script and
invoke new run configuration on it (marking appropriate checkbox in
configuration settings). In next version we're going to integrate
support for background REPL, but for now we have no, so there is no
possibility to load
>
> What ? You used Eclipse, and still wanted to get rid of it and of clojuredev
> ! How sad I am ... ;-)
:))
>
> I've taken a look at what you've done, wow !
>
> How long did it take to realize that ? Were you working on it daily, or
> nightly ?
I had a couple of weeks off at Dec. Since Jan. i
On Feb 26, 2009, at 13:04, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> Of course that should better be
...
>
> so that it doesn't mess up already qualified symbols.
And even that is not good enough: it won't handle symbols/vars from
other namespaces that are referred to. And that's where I am lost. I
can't find
I don't have a Scheme here to check it out, but doesn't
(cons 1)
yield
'(1)
or am I wrong?
In either case how could it be stated more accurately/clearly?
Thanks
Jim
On Feb 26, 7:52 am, "Michel S." wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> "In Scheme, passing cons one parameter encloses that parameter in a
> li
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 4:03 PM, jim wrote:
>
> I don't have a Scheme here to check it out, but doesn't
>
> (cons 1)
>
> yield
>
> '(1)
no. in scheme (and in all modern lisps), cons is a 2 arguments procedure.
Giving it 1 is an error.
Some very old lisp dialects supplied NIL in place of missin
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:00 AM, David Sletten wrote:
>
> Whoops...it's "rational?" that was missing from the API page and
> still is.
The API page is programmaticly generated from the docstrings, but like
the rest of the site generally reflects the latest release, not the
latest svn version.
-
Looking at the code, lcons does indeed require two parms. I must've
been zoned out when I wrote the comment. Thanks for catching that.
On Feb 26, 9:10 am, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
> no. in scheme (and in all modern lisps), cons is a 2 arguments procedure.
> Giving it 1 is an error.
>
> Some v
Hi all,
I could use a version of 'partial' that would allow me to:
- Partially apply a function to any of its arguments, not just the
first one
- 'Unapply' a partially-applied function from one of its arguments.
Is any such thing already available?
Thanks,
Anand
--~--~-~--~~---
2009/2/26 Anand Patil
>
> Hi all,
>
> I could use a version of 'partial' that would allow me to:
>
> - Partially apply a function to any of its arguments, not just the
> first one
That's already the case, haven't you made a little test ?
>
> - 'Unapply' a partially-applied function from one o
"partial" is a currying function. It can be provided any number of
parameter(s), but it is always behaves sequentially from start to finish.
That is what currying *is*.
You can easily partially apply to other arguments by doing this: #(fred %1
some-arg %2 other-arg).
"partial" could not easily
I thought for sure it would be faster to use "some" to determine
whether an item was in a list rather than convert the list to a set
and then use "contains?", but it turns out I was wrong. The latter
approach takes about 1/3 to 1/2 the time! This is the case even when
the list contains 100 items.
2009/2/26 Jeffrey Straszheim
> "partial" is a currying function. It can be provided any number of
> parameter(s), but it is always behaves sequentially from start to finish.
> That is what currying *is*.
>
Ah, I thought currying / uncurrying what the term reserved for this
operation (as I reme
Hey all,
What is the idiomatic way to concatenate strings? Here are some things
that I expected to work, but didn't
(+ "foo" "bah")
(conj "foo" "bah")
(into "foo" "bah")
For the moment I am doing
(.concat "foo" "bah")
But it seems wrong
Thanks
P
--~--~-~--~~-
(str "foo" "bah")
and if you have a collection you can (apply str coll)
HTH,
--
Laurent
2009/2/26 Peter Wolf
>
> Hey all,
>
> What is the idiomatic way to concatenate strings? Here are some things
> that I expected to work, but didn't
>
>(+ "foo" "bah")
>(conj "foo" "bah")
>(int
On Feb 26, 5:11 pm, Peter Wolf wrote:
> What is the idiomatic way to concatenate strings? Here are some things
> that I expected to work, but didn't
>
> (+ "foo" "bah")
> (conj "foo" "bah")
> (into "foo" "bah")
>
> For the moment I am doing
>
> (.concat "foo" "bah")
(str "foo" "
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Peter Wolf wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> What is the idiomatic way to concatenate strings? Here are some things
> that I expected to work, but didn't
>
>(+ "foo" "bah")
>(conj "foo" "bah")
>(into "foo" "bah")
>
> For the moment I am doing
>
>(.concat "
Thanks for the responses, guys.
>> - Partially apply a function to any of its arguments, not just the
>> first one
>That's already the case, haven't you made a little test ?
I meant I want to apply it out of sequence, sorry.
> You can easily partially apply to other arguments by doing this: #(
Thanks for the responses, guys.
>> - Partially apply a function to any of its arguments, not just the
>> first one
>That's already the case, haven't you made a little test ?
I meant I want to apply it out of sequence, sorry.
> You can easily partially apply to other arguments by doing this: #(
Sorry, I thought I had pushed 'stop' in time to stop the first
response.
On Feb 26, 4:16 pm, Anand Patil
wrote:
> Thanks for the responses, guys.
>
> >> - Partially apply a function to any of its arguments, not just the
> >> first one
> >That's already the case, haven't you made a little test ?
On Feb 26, 9:24 am, Anand Patil
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I could use a version of 'partial' that would allow me to:
>
> - Partially apply a function to any of its arguments, not just the
> first one
> - 'Unapply' a partially-applied function from one of its arguments.
>
> Is any such thing already
On Feb 26, 4:41 pm, mikel wrote:
> Other people have explained currying and partial application, and why
> it doesn't normally spply the feature you want.
I'd be interested in reading about this if you know of a link.
> Normally, in a lnaguage that supplies partial application, the way to
> a
Nice initiative!
However, it the net-ssh dependency has problems:
[cvh: ~]$ sudo gem install djspiewak-buildr
ERROR: While executing gem ... (Gem::RemoteFetcher::FetchError)
timed out (http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/net-ssh-2.0.4.gem)
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Daniel Spiewak wrote
On Feb 25, 6:51 pm, Rich Hickey wrote:
> user=> (type #^{:type ::Fred} [1 2 3])
> :user/Fred
This is extremely appealing, as David said, for those of us building
type systems for our application data.
There's one wart for my particular use:
(binding [*print-dup* true]
(prn-str #^{:
Thanks for the insight, Konrad. I know this is a sideshow to the larger
discussion on types, but it does present an unexpected usability issue.
On 26 February 2009 at 02:44, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> The fix is to provide a default implementation for print-method. Try
> executing this:
>
> (def
Odd. Must be a problem with RubyForge. If you try again, does it
work?
Daniel
On Feb 26, 10:58 am, Christian Vest Hansen
wrote:
> Nice initiative!
>
> However, it the net-ssh dependency has problems:
>
> [cvh: ~]$ sudo gem install djspiewak-buildr
> ERROR: While executing gem ... (Gem::Remot
Wow, great !
Some notes I took while reading your e-mail : (those are some pitfalls I
came through while implementing clojuredev's eclipse auto-build feature)
* does it support namespaces separated in several files (handling files
that begin with 'in-ns, or just not trying to compile them ?)
*
> > Note that you cannot mix Java and Clojure sources within the same
> > project.
>
> Aww... :(
Joint-compilation is actually a hard problem normally. However, since
Clojure is late-bound, I should be able to do it without too much
horror. Actually, I should be able to do joint compilation wi
On Feb 26, 10:58 am, Anand Patil
wrote:
> On Feb 26, 4:41 pm, mikel wrote:
>
> > Other people have explained currying and partial application, and why
> > it doesn't normally spply the feature you want.
>
> I'd be interested in reading about this if you know of a link.
What I meant was, other
Hi Mark,
The results will depend on the objects you are comparing. If you need
to search through the list multiple times, converting to a set once is
almost certainly going to be faster. But, if you're just doing it
once, iterating will usually be much faster:
user> (time (dotimes [_ 10] (
> * does it support namespaces separated in several files (handling files
> that begin with 'in-ns, or just not trying to compile them ?)
> * if so, will it support the scenario of multiple files per ns, where just
> another file (and not the file defining the ns) is modified ?
I didn't even k
Well, I guess the second number is a bit misleading. Of course, when
you're iterating the time taken will depend on the (expected) presence
and position of the target in the list. Still, the order is the same
even in the worst case:
user> (time (dotimes [_ 10] (some #(= 100 %) (range 100)))
On Feb 26, 5:27 pm, mikel wrote:
> On Feb 26, 10:58 am, Anand Patil
> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 26, 4:41 pm, mikel wrote:
>
> > > Other people have explained currying and partial application, and why
> > > it doesn't normally spply the feature you want.
>
> > I'd be interested in reading about this i
For those of you who encountered issues/bugs with Waterfront, you not
submit reports at:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=browse&group_id=249246&atid=1126790
My intention is to get Waterfront into contrib in the near future.
Till then, Waterfront will stay on sf.net.
Also, thank you very m
Should be "you can now submit..."
Sorry for the typo.
-Itay
On Feb 26, 9:37 pm, Itay Maman wrote:
> For those of you who encountered issues/bugs with Waterfront, you not
> submit reports
> at:http://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=browse&group_id=249246&atid=112...
>
> My intention is to get W
On Feb 26, 12:34 pm, Anand Patil
wrote:
> On Feb 26, 5:27 pm, mikel wrote:
>
> > On Feb 26, 10:58 am, Anand Patil
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 26, 4:41 pm, mikel wrote:
>
> > > > Other people have explained currying and partial application, and why
> > > > it doesn't normally spply the feature
Thanks all.
I think appending a bunch of strings is a pretty common operation.
Is there any reason that str is limited to 2 arguments? It would be
nice to do (str "foo" "bar" "baz") --> "foobarbaz".
Is there a good reason that + can't do the right thing as with other
Java and scripting lang
On Feb 26, 2009, at 2:01 PM, Peter Wolf wrote:
>
> Thanks all.
>
> I think appending a bunch of strings is a pretty common operation.
>
> Is there any reason that str is limited to 2 arguments? It would be
> nice to do (str "foo" "bar" "baz") --> "foobarbaz".
It does. Try it out. =)
>
>
> Is
Hello Ilya,
Thanks for the workaround.
I'm glad to hear you're working on a "surround with" feature. Some
other parenthesis commands that I most commonly use is:
1) Delete next Sexp.
2) Splice Sexp. (Remove the parenthesis around the current sexp).
3) Move cursor to next/previous sexp.
Jus
> Is there any reason that str is limited to 2 arguments? It would be
> nice to do (str "foo" "bar" "baz") --> "foobarbaz".
Try it! (Hint: "With more than one arg, returns the concatenation of
the str values of the args.")
> Is there a good reason that + can't do the right thing as with other
>
Peter Wolf writes:
> Is there a good reason that + can't do the right thing as with other
> Java and scripting languages? I think this would be popular with
> non-LISPers.
Putting a type check in + would slow down basic math, and there is a
class of user who will complain loudly if basic mat
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Konrad Hinsen
wrote:
>
> I figured out one way to do it, but it relies on features that are
> perhaps not safe to rely on: I get var first, and then I get the
> var's namespace from its public attribute ns:
>
> (defn qualified-symbol
> [s]
> (if-let [var (reso
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
>
> Peter Wolf writes:
>
> > Is there a good reason that + can't do the right thing as with other
> > Java and scripting languages? I think this would be popular with
> > non-LISPers.
>
> Putting a type check in + would slow down basic math
> > > Note that you cannot mix Java and Clojure sources within the same
> > > project.
It is supported in the latest changeset. The following configurations
are possible:
-
Just Clojure:
* src/main/clojure
Clojure and Scala:
* src/main/clojure
* src/main/scala
Clojure,
Doh! *engage brain BEFORE emailing*
Sorry to be not thinking... Coffee now!
:-P
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Perry Trolard
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:13:49
To: Clojure
Subject: Re: "Adding" strings
> Is there any reason that str is limited to 2 argum
On Feb 26, 5:55 am, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> While not checking types at compile time, it seems to me that a lot of
> clojure code still needs in the docstring some sort of "preconditions
> warnings".
Do you mean something like "Contract Programming," as in e.g., the
Eiffel programming language?
My first thought was just : "could some information that is currently placed
in the docstring be more useful is written differently, while still
complying with the DRY principle (that is, the parts that are extracted from
the current docstring should still be available in a useful form to the
clien
Is there a quick way to read a file into a java array of bytes?
martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe fro
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Jason Wolfe wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> The results will depend on the objects you are comparing. If you need
> to search through the list multiple times, converting to a set once is
> almost certainly going to be faster. But, if you're just doing it
> once, iterat
Ah, OK, a couple of things.
First, if you're running timing experiments, you probably want the
times to be measured in seconds for them to be at all reliable. It
seems to take up to 10 seconds of executing a bit of code before
HotSpot is done optimizing it (depending on complexity of what
On 26.02.2009, at 20:25, Chouser wrote:
> I've got essentially the same thing for use in error-kit:
>
> (defn- qualify-sym [sym]
> (let [v (resolve sym)]
> (assert v)
> (apply symbol (map #(str (% ^v)) [:ns :name]
Except that you get the information from the metadata. I won
This is an example:
(contains? (set (range 100)) 10)))
(some #(= 10 %) (range 100
I would like some way to rule the order of the arguments. For example
what - where.
contains? what where
some what where
I'm sure you can think some rules to cover many cases. As I am not so
young, I'm ge
On 26.02.2009, at 10:00, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> I know, but as I said, my current implementation is just a proof of
> concept. It is not viable for production use for a variety of
> reasons. I was planning to replace it by something based on gen-class
> and proxy, but I will first try to get away
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
>
> Odd. Must be a problem with RubyForge. If you try again, does it
> work?
I tried again at home and got quite a bit further. Maybe it was just a
hiccup at rubyforge.
However, I still see some questionable things in the output, and I
ha
On Feb 26, 2009, at 3:57 PM, camponoblanco wrote:
This is an example:
(contains? (set (range 100)) 10)))
(some #(= 10 %) (range 100
I would like some way to rule the order of the arguments. For example
what - where.
contains? what where
some what where
I'm sure you can think some rule
I'm not sure what the File not found thing is all about, but you
should still be ok (crazy gems). Try the following:
buildr --version
Daniel
On Feb 26, 3:16 pm, Christian Vest Hansen
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
>
> > Odd. Must be a problem with RubyForg
OK had my coffee, and had several thoughts...
1 -- What are Strings? How should the Clojure programmer think about
them? Are they sequences, in which case all the sequence functions
should work. Or are they atomic built-in types like Integers and Floats?
2 -- There is already some type chec
rowe:~$ buildr --version
/opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in
`gem_original_require': no such file to load -- buildr (LoadError)
from
/opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in
`require'
from
/opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/g
>
> So my vote is that String are atomic built in objects, and at least +, <
> and > should work with Strings. The behavior should be just like Java,
> so (+ "foo" 2) --> "foo2"
>
-1
Concatenation is not addition. I'm almost opposed to numeric operators
all together. If we wrote (add 2 3), the
Thanks. I will definitely be using this function... keep me up to
date on any changes.
Bill wrote:
> > It occurs to me that the "unbean" function could be very useful when
> > writing tests for code that calls Java objects.
>
> Yes, that is exactly the use I have in mind.
--~--~-~--~
Ah I see, yes that makes sense.
Relationships truly are a contract in this case!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubs
Agree,
I even think there *could* be some utility in having the opposite behavior
(but I'm not even sure about that) :
(+ "1" 2) --> 3 by + trying to cast its non numeric arguments before
throwing an exception ...
--
Laurent
2009/2/26 Allen Rohner
>
>
> >
> > So my vote is that String are at
Laurent PETIT writes:
> > Concatenation is not addition. I'm almost opposed to numeric operators
> > all together. If we wrote (add 2 3), there would be no confusion at
> > all about what (add "foo" 2) should do, because you'd be writing (conj
> > "foo" (str 2))
>
> Agree
I agre
On Feb 26, 4:56 pm, Peter Wolf wrote:
>
> So my vote is that String are atomic built in objects, and at least +, <
> and > should work with Strings. The behavior should be just like Java,
> so (+ "foo" 2) --> "foo2"
I have an HP calculator. (I may get some of the details wrong here, I
haven
> I agree regarding concatenation as well, but I think the case for
> comparison of non-numerics is still pretty strong.
>
> -Phil
Are you referring to using <, >, =, with objects that implement
java.lang.Comparable?
i.e. given x.compareTo(y) == -1
(< x y)
=> true
I would find that useful.
Al
If we wrote (add 2 3), there would be no confusion at
> all about what (add "foo" 2) should do, because you'd be writing (conj
> "foo" (str 2))
I wrote this too hastily. This could more easily be written (str "foo"
2)
--Allen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received th
I've only had a couple of minutes to work with it, but I'm already
liking it. I just can't keep switching between Emacs and IDEA and
IDEA is the work that pays the bills!
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:08 AM, CuppoJava wrote:
>
> Hello Ilya,
> Thanks for the workaround.
>
> I'm glad to hear you're
Crud. I suspect this is something weird with the way that the GitHib
gem server works. I'll try to repeat the problem on Ubuntu as soon as
I get back to my computer. In the meantime, you could try these
commands:
sudo gem uninstall djspiewak-buildr
sudo gem install djspiewak-buildr
Daniel
Hi,
After having used Clojure for a few months now, I'm still having lots
of trouble separating my mutable code from my immutable code. My use-
case is pretty typical I think, so I'm wondering what sort of
structure everyone else is using.
Here's my current structure.
I have an engine that manag
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Martin DeMello wrote:
>
> Is there a quick way to read a file into a java array of bytes?
(let [fl (java.io.File. "/tmp/datafile")
ary (make-array Byte/TYPE (.length fl))]
(with-open [strm (java.io.FileInputStream. fl)]
(.read strm ary 0 (.length fl))
On Feb 26, 3:04 pm, Martin DeMello wrote:
> Is there a quick way to read a file into a java array of bytes?
You want Apache Commons IO:
http://commons.apache.org/io/
Specifically, http://tinyurl.com/cytspt
-Stuart Sierra
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
