On 26.02.2009, at 10:00, Konrad Hinsen wrote: > I know, but as I said, my current implementation is just a proof of > concept. It is not viable for production use for a variety of > reasons. I was planning to replace it by something based on gen-class > and proxy, but I will first try to get away with the new type > function.
I just committed a completely new implementation to clojure.contrib. It uses a vector with type metadata for representing algebraic data types. Overall I am rather happy with this version. It is used almost exactly like the previous one. There is probably still room for improvement, but I don't expect the interface to change significantly any more, so I'd say it's safe for adoption by adventurous Clojurians :-) Konrad. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
