If we wrote (add 2 3), there would be no confusion at > all about what (add "foo" 2) should do, because you'd be writing (conj > "foo" (str 2))
I wrote this too hastily. This could more easily be written (str "foo" 2) --Allen --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
