2009/2/26 Itay Maman <itay.ma...@gmail.com>

>
>
>
> On Feb 26, 2:02 pm, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hin...@laposte.net> wrote:
> > On Feb 26, 2009, at 12:30, Itay Maman wrote:
> >
> > > In Java6 @Override can also be attached to a method that overrides an
> > > interface-declared method. So, the code is not supposed to compile w/
> > > a Java5 compiler. As for the Java6 compiler, my guess is that your
> > > compile is configured to be Java5 complaint. So I would suggest to
> > > specify "-source 1.6" in the javac command line. Anyway, I will add it
> > > to the build.xml file.
> >
> > Do you need Java 1.6 features? Clojure itself works fine with 1.5,
> > and there are still machines around for which there is no 1.6 (my PPC
> > Mac running MacOS 10.4, for example), so it would be nice if
> > Waterfront could work with Java 1.5 as well.
>
> No I don't need Java6. My Eclipse is configured to be Java6-compliant
> so it generates


What ? You used Eclipse, and still wanted to get rid of it and of clojuredev
! How sad I am ... ;-)

I've taken a look at what you've done, wow !

How long did it take to realize that ? Were you working on it daily, or
nightly ?

Keep up the good work !

-- 
Laurent



>
> these @Overrides annotations automatically. I agree with your point.
> I'll get rid of those.
>
> Coming to think about it, I don't even need the Java code so much. It
> is just a few classes
> which realize some low-level UI stuff which seemed to be more natural
> in Java than in Clojure.
> I do want to translate them to Clojure at some point. This will solve
> this issue altogether.
>
> -Itay
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to