Doh! *engage brain BEFORE emailing* Sorry to be not thinking... Coffee now!
:-P Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -----Original Message----- From: Perry Trolard <trol...@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:13:49 To: Clojure<clojure@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: "Adding" strings > Is there any reason that str is limited to 2 arguments? It would be > nice to do (str "foo" "bar" "baz") --> "foobarbaz". Try it! (Hint: "With more than one arg, returns the concatenation of the str values of the args.") > Is there a good reason that + can't do the right thing as with other > Java and scripting languages? I think this would be popular with > non-LISPers. I think any desire for that disappears once you discover str, but the implementation reason against it is that it'd require arg checks for +, which you want to be fast. Look at the source for + & str -- they're both optimized for what they do. Perry --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
