so that you reference the type tree in some way in your test and
get the appropriate id range on the fly (and, of course, maintain the bounding
pair of ids in the tree for each node).
Antony Blakey
-
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
If you pick up a starving dog and make
t, and so on.
>
> That's not the definition of depth-first, is it ?
It's a pre-order depth-first traversal.
Antony Blakey
-
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
On the other side, you have the customer and/or user, and they tend to do what
we call "automat
> are trying to solve and the issues of various approaches you considered
> then I can usually understand the solution.
Symbol resolution allows the environment to link symbols and their occurrences,
and the same with hyperlinked output.
Antony Blakey
-
CTO, Linkuistics Pty
erences require it. All publishers support
> it and it is widely used.
Going from the PLT form to Latex is possible. Why use Latex when you can use
Clojure?
The essence of the PLT model is the language integration that allows symbol
resolution by reusing the language mechanism for the document
Might be of interest to some here: http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/4017
Antony Blakey
--
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the
experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent
u have the type information at the call site. This way, you can pay for the
type-driven dispatch once at the start of a computation and end up doing
minimal testing (basically dynamically checking that type invariants are
maintained e.g. args haven't been promoted in the case under discuss
On 18/06/2010, at 2:26 PM, David Nolen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Antony Blakey
> wrote:
>
> That's fine for fact, but as a consumer of library functions, how do I know
> when I should pass in bigints? How do I know when an intermediate value, for
> my
be the easy solution
rather than the best solution, which, I acknowledge, might be very hard work,
possibly involving every such function having 2 polymorphic variants, one
generic boxed form and one unboxed form, automatically selected and
call-site-cached like OO dispatch.
Antony Blakey
---
page just
> presents a few of these answers).
+1
Antony Blakey
--
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
What can be done with fewer [assumptions] is done in vain with more
-- William of Ockham (ca. 1285-1349)
--
You received this message because you are su
On 11/06/2010, at 1:48 PM, Antony Blakey wrote:
>
> On 11/06/2010, at 7:28 AM, James Reeves wrote:
>
>> On 10 June 2010 22:40, Michael Jaaka wrote:
>>> Not good, since if database commit fail it is too late for dosync to
>>> rollback.
>>> In fact dat
change to clojure's transactional mechanism in order to break the
existing commit login into a prepare and commit.
Antony Blakey
--
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe
that ther
On 31/05/2010, at 2:27 PM, James Cunningham wrote:
>
>
> On May 30, 9:23 pm, Antony Blakey wrote:
>> I care about Mac and Windows primarily, and building software that will sell
>> (not dev tools) requires good native look and feel.
>
> Do you have a single examp
a lot), why get entangled
> in a complex process with all the above ramifications ?
>
> Simplicity as some value. You should meditate a bit on this.
I'm a big fan of simplicity. However there are two sayings that come to mind:
1. Make everything as simple as possible, but not simple
box as regards testing. It has it's own test
regime and cross-platform validation.
> Were not in the cosmetics business however so we speak for our business
> (cross-platform, cross-language, cross-)
You are begging the question then.
Antony Blakey
--
CTO
On 31/05/2010, at 12:31 PM, Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2010 10:53:45 +0930
> Antony Blakey wrote:
>
>>
>> On 31/05/2010, at 10:44 AM, Marc Spitzer wrote:
>>> also lets not forget about LD_LIBRARY_PATH issues,
>> No Mac or Windows user would encoun
a user's perspective for the two
consumer desktop platforms.
Antony Blakey
--
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
The project was so plagued by politics and ego that when the engineers
requested technical oversight, our manager hired a psychologist instead.
-
Better" is a good target and generally
> much more achievable then superlative. Shipped is also a wonderful
> thing. Better and shipped are really cool. And if you keep shipping
> better thing you get to superlative.
Not if your toolkit (Swing) places an upper bound on the quality
for producing
something great. And anyway is 'good enough' what we should be aiming for. How
about going for something superlative rather than something mediocre.
Bundling SWT into a native wrapper isn't a big deal.
Antony Blakey
--
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Lt
think, are well worth the
> effort.
+1 SWT. I think arguments that focus on the ease of deployment are misguided
because an app is *used* far more times than it is deployed, so one really
should focus on the quality of the end application. In any case, deployment and
pack
reliable
semantic versioning drop points e.g. stable major version numbers. I only raise
this point because being a subproject IME discourages major-point releases in
deference to the version number of the containing project.
In an ideal world of course.
Antony Blakey
--
ore needs to first pass into the quarantine zone that
is clojure.contrib.
Antony Blakey
--
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you
do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possib
you shouldn't be using me" status.
I'd like to advise you to only rely on single-purpose packages you find through
dependency resolution (maven or lein) rather then the one-version-fits-all
you're-a-fool-if-you-use-this indispensable big bundle of stuff that is
contrib. But IM
t] (with-open [w (clojure.contrib.io/writer
> "/tmp/out")](clojure.contrib.io/copy (clojure.contrib.http.agent/stream
> agnt) w)))
>
> Is there anything obvious I'm missing here?
The error is that it can't send your XML as the body. Convert the XML to a
string and send that
IN THE FACE all along? Well, this is mine:
>
> (ns org.InfoML.genclassObject
> (:gen-class
> :extends [java.lang.Object]
:extends java.lang.Object
(or just extends Object, because java.lang.* is automatically imported)
Antony Blakey
-
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 8
to select the
> right containment function. So the theoretical concerns about this issue
> have basically no exemplars in practice.
>
> "In theory, you may be right about 'contains?.' In practice, Rich Hickey is
> right." - Stu Halloway. :-)
Antony Blakey
-
On 22/04/2010, at 10:48 AM, Sean Devlin wrote:
> I think* the SE one will work, but I haven't tested it.
Yes it does.
Antony Blakey
--
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. Then quit. No use being a damn
fool
xes for anyone else.
I also have a version (1.1.1) of the Enclojure plugin that fixes the
can't-find-clojure-jar when starting a project REPL (which is 100% of the time
with my version of NB). I've sent a pull request to Eric, but in the meantime
I'll make my version available.
An
mplete Leiningen documentation indicates that there
are a number of things not covered in my defproject macro :) I waver between
thinking I should ignore properties I don't understand and wanting to deal with
everything I possibly can, by treating unknowns as errors because you never
know when th
, or I
can make an OS/X .dmg available (but not other platforms).
Of course it works with the latest update-site version of Enclojure, and apart
from a small bug with REPL classpath detection, that I hope is fixed soon, is
really a very nice Clojure environment with useful, albeit minimal Pol
>
>
> Right. Thanks for the thorough explanation. It's not so bad if you
> quote the vectors instead of the individual symbols. However, it seems
> to me that defmaven could very well be a plain function in that case
> (just (reset! *MODEL* (apply Model args))). :)
Yes,
:configuration [[:scanIntervalSeconds 10] [:stopKey "foo"]
[:stopPort ]])]))
where Model, Dependency, Build,. Plugin, Execution (and many more) are
functions that create e.g. org.apache.maven.model.Model and set the properties
from key/value arguments. There are a variety
vn -f project.clj
install should work.
Antony Blakey
-
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and
convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.
-- Martin Luther King
--
You received
e at the end of
reader.clj to see how it works. Because it's a programatic format with
declarative conveniences, I hope it's fairly straightforward to understand.
It also includes a leiningen defproject macro.
I'm hoping to uploaded a prebuilt zip soon.
Antony Blakey
and may get you where you
> want to be for now.
>
> I hope this is helpful.
> Eric
>
> On Mar 17, 9:36 am, Phil Ventura wrote:
>> Are there any plans to integrate Leiningen into enclojure?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
On 28/03/2010, at 8:01 PM, B Smith-Mannschott wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 08:39, Antony Blakey wrote:
>>
>> On 28/03/2010, at 4:42 PM, Antony Blakey wrote:
>>
>>> (defproject main "org.clojars.the-kenny:clojure-couchdb:0.2"
>>> :add-defau
project.clj. Therefore leiningen input files are valid polyglot maven
input files. It isn't 100% or bidirectionally interoperable because a)
leiningen plugins don't work and b) leiningen can't take the full format. Given
all of the above, the following leiningen project.clj would be
* of a string literal, rather than a single token.
I prefer the forms that don't invent new lexical constructs. For a start
they're more amenable to manipulation using direct language facilities.
Antony Blakey
-
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
If a train station
f this discussion:
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/license.html
Antony Blakey
--
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not
sure about the former.
-- Albert Einstein
--
You received
On 28/03/2010, at 4:42 PM, Antony Blakey wrote:
> (defproject main "org.clojars.the-kenny:clojure-couchdb:0.2"
> :add-default-plugins true
> :description "Simple Clojure interface to Apache CouchDB, fork of the
> original project with function arguments instead
ugh without leiningen plugins. I'm not
sure if it's worth it, and I'm interested in hearing arguments pro and con.
My next step is to make sure it's easy to write polyglot maven plugins in
Clojure, with easy deployment.
Antony Blakey
-
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 8
that's trivial -
the command to produce pom.xml from pom.clj (and the translation is
bidirectional) is this:
translate pom.clj newpom.xml
assuming the polyglot maven translate command is on your path. Note that you
can use either maven 2 or 3 to run the resultant pom.xml.
You can use eith
I think that
reinventing all that Maven can do, all of the IDE support, tools, documentation
etc is misdirected effort. Especially given the appearance of polyglot Maven
(Maven 3), which is Maven recast as a Java library that can be driven by
languanges such as Clojure.
Antony Blakey
-
On 26/03/2010, at 4:37 PM, Rayne wrote:
> I don't think I've ever seen a language in which part of the community
> shunned build tools written in the language itself. It's quite
> hilarious.
I've seen many examples where an overwhelming Not-Invented-Here attit
Has anyone looked at driving LLVM from Clojure and then doing code generation
to LLVM? I've had some experience doing it in a JIT context for VisualWorks
Smalltalk, but I'd rather not reinvent the wheel. I'd love to be able to use
Clojure on the iPad.
Antony Blakey
--
e to adopt
both the language, and a different development environment / toolchain e.g.
leiningen etc (which IMO is classic NIH). You can't cross the chasm with too
much baggage. Personally I don't believe this will happen unless core
developers use the tools and practices that users want t
ally I wish that leiningen effort was instead put towards polyglot maven
http://polyglot.sonatype.org/
Antony Blakey
-
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
Nothing is really work unless you would rather be doing something else.
-- J. M. Barre
--
You received this message bec
On 07/08/2009, at 7:15 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
>
> Ruby and Gem is such great terminology, can we come up with something
> half as cool?
Closure and Resolution, are a pair of parallel hononymic puns.
Or Clojure/Seal - you close the package and seal it.
Antony Blakey
mented project I have found in a
> long time.
This is the first I've heard of this project, but what about the 255
page user guide available from:
http://mirror.cc.vt.edu/pub/eclipse/tools/buckminster/doc/BuckyBook.pdf
?
Antony Blakey
--
CTO, Linkuistics
eclisp :)
On 24/06/2009, at 11:05 AM, Matthew Erker wrote:
>
> I second that vote.
> (Though I prefer Clipse, which is somewhat taken.)
>
>
> On Jun 23, 6:47 pm, Rayne wrote:
>> I vote Corona.
>
> >
Antony Blakey
-
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 04
On 17/06/2009, at 10:58 AM, Antony Blakey wrote:
> http://www.pragprog.com/screencasts/v-scgithub/insider-guide-to-github
BTW: the first episode of this is free, and includes a section called
'Send Pull Request'. It's purely about GitHub, rather than git itse
On 17/06/2009, at 10:58 AM, Antony Blakey wrote:
> For anyone looking for explanatory material on git, I have, and can
> therefore recommend these:
>
> http://www.pragprog.com/titles/tsgit/pragmatic-version-control-using-git
> http://www.pragprog.com/screencasts/v-scgithub/i
For anyone looking for explanatory material on git, I have, and can
therefore recommend these:
http://www.pragprog.com/titles/tsgit/pragmatic-version-control-using-git
http://www.pragprog.com/screencasts/v-scgithub/insider-guide-to-github
https://peepcode.com/products/git
Antony Blakey
7;s not what
Rich is talking about here.
A common GitHub workflow is to fork someone's repository, clone your
fork, push your changes to your GitHub fork, and then send a pull
request to the owner of the 'canonical' repository that you forked
from, asking them to pull cer
se don't send pull requests via GitHub at this
> time.
>
> What's the reason to avoid "git pull"? Is there another way to get
> updates?
To send a pull *request* in git is asking a remote repository to
accept *your* changes. It's how you contribute, it&#x
o be
written and maintained if it's not right there, with the source files,
and that's ignoring the issues of tool support and version control.
Antony Blakey
-
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
In anything at all, perfection is finally attained not when there is
no
ase review the doc for your
> contributions to make sure it is complete and correct in general. Let
> me know if anything doesn't seem to be going through the wringer
> correctly.
>
> Happy perusing!
>
> Tom
>
> >
Antony Blakey
-
CTO, Linkuistics Pty
On 21/04/2009, at 10:51 AM, Antony Blakey wrote:
> On 21/04/2009, at 10:22 AM, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
>> I'm unfamiliar with the POM version coordinate system - any hints?
>
> My comment was in support of Laurent's proposal. I'm a relative
> maven newb, b
will not satisfy a request for 'a.b.c' e.g. -SNAPSHOT is not a further
qualifier.
Antony Blakey
--
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
The project was so plagued by politics and ego that when the engineers
request
e scheme that maps to and
from the pom version coordinate system in a transparent fashion,
particularly in relation to this particular feature of that system.
Antony Blakey
--
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
Always have a vis
On 20/04/2009, at 6:13 PM, fft1976 wrote:
> On Apr 19, 3:20 am, Antony Blakey wrote:
>
>> If I use Clojure commercially, I'll certainly pay for it.
>
> Please do not forget to pay for JVM, Java, Linux, tar and others.
When they start asking for donations, and don'
. I've bought every Scala book
available, and I'll do the same for Clojure to encourage the market
for books in niche markets.
If I use Clojure commercially, I'll certainly pay for it. Apart from
the fact that I believe one should do so, it has the practical benefit
of encouragin
On 19/04/2009, at 8:08 AM, Rayne wrote:
>
> So you want him to write something that Rich hasn't said on his
> website to market his book? :\
But Rich has written that - it's from Rich's forward to Stuart's book.
Am I misunderstanding your point?
Antony Blakey
-
is the only committer *and contributor* to core, then it's a
moot point what VCS is used for core.
Antony Blakey
-
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
A Buddhist walks up to a hot-dog stand and says, "Make me one with
e
es of a book about the language,
1.0 is pretty much ready now, although wasn't there something about
method dispatch / hierarchies that Rich was looking at?
Antony Blakey
--
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
Hi, I'd like to do $THING. I know that $SOLU
ub - in my experience it motivates
contributions/contributors because it is such a low-barrier platform
for collaborative/experimentation.
Antony Blakey
-
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of
comfort and convenie
al APL
operators. More convenient, but for me it loses some of the charm of
APL.
Not at all Lispy.
Antony Blakey
--
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
A priest, a minister and a rabbi walk into a bar. The bartender says
"What is t
tivity aspect. (ie. how quick can I
> get real work done)
If you are interested in Forth you should probably check Factor at
http://factorcode.org/
Antony Blakey
-
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
It is no measure of health to be well adjust
, which was my point.
> I personally use IntelliJ IDEA. But who says I
> paid for it?
I'm not sure what point you are making.
Antony Blakey
--
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
Don't anthropomorp
for which I pay 5% of my gross billings, is good deal
because the productivity benefits pay for themselves.
Antony Blakey
-
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
He who would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy
from repression.
On 01/04/2009, at 10:47 AM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> Something that can be thought of as "workable specs" for the GUI,
> where one does not have to switch language from one abstraction
> level to the other.
You should have a look at the Scala wrapping of SWT.
Antony Blake
ou want to do
mixed Scala/Clojure development, IntelliJ's Scala support has
considerably loftier goals than Eclipse/NetBeans e.g. first-class
support for the language model wrt refactoring etc.
Antony Blakey
--
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
Lack of will
sive (and in any case precisely equivalent to my first
suggestion).
Antony Blakey
-
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the
other way
72 matches
Mail list logo
