On 17/06/2009, at 10:37 AM, Mark Volkmann wrote:
> I think you've got that backwards. A "git push" is how I would ask > the remote repo to accept my changes. A "git pull" says I want to > update my local repo with changes someone made in the remote repo. No, you can send a *request* to Rich, via GitHub, to pull from your repository. That's what a git pull *request* is - it's a request for someone else to git pull. A 'git pull' is, as you say, the command to pull commits into your repository and apply them, but that's not what Rich is talking about here. A common GitHub workflow is to fork someone's repository, clone your fork, push your changes to your GitHub fork, and then send a pull request to the owner of the 'canonical' repository that you forked from, asking them to pull certain commits from your fork. Antony Blakey -------------------------- CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd Ph: 0438 840 787 Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. -- Douglas Adams --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
