xim installation set up to reject mail on spamminess,
using SpamAssassin or similar?
I find that SA detects a lot of mail using SA rules that probably
contain attachments or inline images that are virus laden, but it's
cheaper on system resources to reject at SMTP time than ru
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 08:49:55 +0200
Łukasz Baniecki via clamav-users wrote:
> It specifically says I get 403 from Cloudflare. I must be banned,
403 is temporary error, if it was permanent (which might be due to a
ban) it would be a 5xx error.
--
Brian Morri
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:22:43 -0500
Grant Taylor via clamav-users wrote:
> On 7/11/23 8:44 AM, Brian Morrison wrote:
> > 403 is temporary error, if it was permanent (which might be due to
> > a ban) it would be a 5xx error.
> I may need more coffee, but I don't think t
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:29:21 +0100
Steve Sargent wrote:
> Is ClamAV 0.95.2 available for Fedora?
>
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1470
--
Brian
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
h
ere any
> way to no show this information as it sometimes confuses and scares
> people.
I doubt that ClamAV is responsible for this message, it's probably
added by your MTA or some other piece of software that calls ClamAV.
--
Brian Morrison
__
natures and identifies them. It is the MTA at the ISP that is then
programmed to take appropriate action based on this identification.
Can you provide some more details?
--
Brian Morrison
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clam
for clamd and freshclam if
you use them, an easy way of doing that is using meld to see the diffs
between the files you have and the .rpmnew files created by the rpm
build process.
Doesn't take long to do, each new clamav update takes me about 10
minutes to have the new daemons installed and r
ed, so reject at SMTP time and thus never actually deliver the
email.
--
Brian Morrison
"I am not young enough to know everything"
Oscar Wilde
___
Help us build a comp
ction before you make it live.
--
Brian Morrison
"I am not young enough to know everything"
Oscar Wilde
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit h
n 48MB and when I
run my rpm build script it tells me that the main and daily cvd files
are missing.
--
Brian Morrison
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:39:19 -0400
Matt Olney wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Brian Morrison
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:13:30 -0400
> > Matt Olney wrote:
> >
> > > We're having some trouble with our freshmeat account. You can
>
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:59:46 -0400
gene heskett wrote:
> Is there a method that would faithfully duplicate the rpm installs
> image?
Rebuild the rpms after downloading the source tarball and changing the
version number in your spec file.
--
Brian Mo
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 15:17:03 +0200
"Len Conrad " wrote:
> Is there any clam tool to release from quarantine?
Surely it was postfix that actually quarantined these messages?
--
Brian Morrison
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV
r malicious acts to be possible. The source code doesn't even
have to contain the exploit.
http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/ken/trust.html
--
Brian Morrison
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:50:10 +0100 (BST)
"G.W. Haywood" wrote:
> PS Please don't mail somebody's email address to the whole world.
It's in the list headers, it's already been made public on the list
and in the archives.
--
Brian Morrison
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:02:40 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> if you post your own i will reply with it non hidded
Be my guest, my email address has been public for many years without
problems.
--
Brian Morrison
"I am not young enough to know ev
as well, so it's entirely possible that an address
in the list headers can be harvested.
--
Brian Morrison
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
to catch up?
>
There is a 0.97.7 directory at Sourceforge, updated on 11th March it
seems.
The changelog is a bit short of detail, but looks like a security fix
is included.
Seems not to have been announced yet.
--
Brian Morrison
___
Help us build
ing for a day or two last week or maybe the week before.
I assumed it was some sort of infrastructure problem and as it wasn't
affecting getting new signature files I didn't worry too much.
--
Brian Morrison
___
Help us build a com
signatures.
FYI I'm using self-built rpms for a machine running RH9.
Thanks.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
"Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud;
after a while you realize you are muddy and the pig is enjoying it."
Gnu
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 19:56:44 +0100
Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since updating to 0.9x I have noticed that from time to time after a
> cdiff update via freshclam, clamd reports a much smaller value for the
> number of signatures than freshclam. Some number of updates
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 23:02:22 +0300
"Török Edvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/9/07, Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 19:56:44 +0100
> > Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Since upda
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:58:35 +0200
Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 21:31:56 +0100
> Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Are you sure freshclam and clamd are configured the same database
> > > directory?
> >
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:04:01 +0200
Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:57:15 +0100
> Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:58:35 +0200
> > Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> &
h amavis) relys on clamd, so if it
> is down, the whole mail traffic is blocked!!
I'd say that it is more dangerous to stop mail delivery due to failed
virus scanning than it is not to scan mail while clamd is unresponsive.
--
Brian Morrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
ably not easily feasible)
Do you have any better ideas?
--
Brian Morrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
;s 0.90.1 src rpm
but with the 0.90.2 tarball in about 5 minutes this morning. Waiting for
the official rpms is unnecessary, you can switch to those when they appear.
--
Brian Morrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: vi
ry cleanup script that sits
in /etc/cron.daily where if there is no .cvd file in the database
directory (usually /var/lib/clamav) a file named *.cvd is put there.
There is a fix for this if you look further up this list you will find
a post containing alternative code. I think this has now made it i
Clovis Tristao wrote:
> Brian Morrison wrote:
>> Which FC version are you running?
>>
>> I built and installed rpms based on the crash-hat repo's 0.90.1 src rpm
>> but with the 0.90.2 tarball in about 5 minutes this morning. Waiting for
>> the official rpms i
lt or src rpms available from there
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
"Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud;
after a while you realize you are muddy and the pig is enjoying it."
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwk
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:37:05 -0400
"Sai Bathina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have about 16 viruses that are not being caught by the 0.90.1 version
You need to install 0.90.2, I doubt the developers will do much if
you're using the previous version.
--
Brian Morriso
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 23:02:22 +0300
"Török Edvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/9/07, Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 19:56:44 +0100
> > Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Since upda
it clearly
depends on another package that contains the clamav libraries.
If you need clamd, then if you don't install clamav-server, you won't
have it.
--
Brian Morrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Help us build a comprehensive Cla
Even more surprisingly, the link still appears to point to 0.90rc3, but
when the mirror actually delivers the file, it is indeed 0.91rc1.
"These are not the tarballs you are looking for!"
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
"Arguing with an engineer is like wrestli
t the spec file needs the addition of the
libclamunrar*.so* libraries to the files section.
It's easy, find the line that adds the libclamav*.so.* files and copy
it, then modify it as shown in my first sentence.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
"Arguing with an engineer
aries
so you need to either change:
%attr(0755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libclamav.so.*
to:
%attr(0755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libclam*.so.*
or add:
%attr(0755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libclamaunrar*.so.*
immediately after the original statement for libclamav.so.*
The latter is probably better as it
;PhishingScanURLs yes" in
clamd.conf.
It's highly likely that you have another copy of clamd running, check
in your path and delete the one that doesn't belong to the package you
installed.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
"Arguing with an engineer is like wr
I've just built and installed 0.93, when the new versions try and start
I get this error:
/usr/sbin/clamd: relocation error: /usr/libclamav.so.4: undefined
symbol: rarvm_free
A grep through the source doesn't appear to show anything obvious to me
anyway, the system in use is RH9 BTW, patched u
Török Edwin wrote:
> Brian Morrison wrote:
>> I've just built and installed 0.93, when the new versions try and start
>> I get this error:
>>
>> /usr/sbin/clamd: relocation error: /usr/libclamav.so.4: undefined
>> symbol: rarvm_free
>>
>> A grep
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Is the http://clamav.com/download/sources page reporting the wrong
> version or is my cache hosed?
If you're expecting 0.93 then it hasn't got there yet, I see 0.92.1 on
that page.
--
Brian
___
Help us build a comprehensive
Brian Morrison wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Is the http://clamav.com/download/sources page reporting the wrong
>> version or is my cache hosed?
>
> If you're expecting 0.93 then it hasn't got there yet, I see 0.92.1 on
> that page.
>
That changed
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Brian Morrison wrote:
>> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>> Is the http://clamav.com/download/sources page reporting the wrong
>>> version or is my cache hosed?
>> If you're expecting 0.93 then it hasn't got there yet, I see 0.92.1 on
Török Edwin wrote:
> Brian Morrison wrote:
>> Török Edwin wrote:
>>
>>> Brian Morrison wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've just built and installed 0.93, when the new versions try and start
>>>> I get this error:
>>>>
>>&
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:38:21 +0300
Török Edwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Morrison wrote:
> > Török Edwin wrote:
> >
> >> Brian Morrison wrote:
> >>
> >>> I've just built and installed 0.93, when the new versions try and st
Brian Morrison wrote:
> OK, I'll do that if I can't resolve it.
>
> I've checked that there are no old libclamav* files anywhere, they are
> only in /usr/lib/, I've also checked that ld.so.conf is sane, and indeed
> it is the only relevant paths are /usr/l
Brian Morrison wrote:
> Brian Morrison wrote:
>> Brian Morrison wrote:
>>
>>> OK, I'll do that if I can't resolve it.
>>>
>>> I've checked that there are no old libclamav* files anywhere, they are
>>> only in /usr/lib/, I'
Brian Morrison wrote:
> Brian Morrison wrote:
>
>> OK, I'll do that if I can't resolve it.
>>
>> I've checked that there are no old libclamav* files anywhere, they are
>> only in /usr/lib/, I've also checked that ld.so.conf is sane, and indeed
Török Edwin wrote:
> Brian Morrison wrote:
>> Brian Morrison wrote:
>>
>>> Brian Morrison wrote:
>>>
>>>> Brian Morrison wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> OK, I'll do that if I can't resolve it.
>
same thing, and it fixed my problem as
well. I don't understand exactly why this happens, I need to understand
the cause and fix the underlying problem.
Thanks for the assistance. Probably not a clamav bug after all!
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
"Arguing
;t use the old databases.
>
> And today I found some upgrade notes that yesterday in the morning, when I
> download the package, there was not there.
The upgrade notes were there on Monday on Sourceforge, well before the
Clamav home pages were updated.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> So I currently have a main.cvd and a daily.cld, both files. Is this what
> 0.93 uses or will main.cvd be swapped out with a cld container at some
> point?
And might someone explain what this change is about, how it improves
performance or whatever? I had assumed that t
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:49:59 +0100
> Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> And might someone explain what this change is about, how it improves
>> performance or whatever? I had assumed that the change to using .inc
>> dire
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:38:05 +0100
> Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Does the unsigned .cld file mean that an attack vector could be to edit
>> the .cld file and thus corrupt it? I can see that the cdiff signing
>> prote
Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Yes, I realise that. I run clamd under user clamav, hence it's probably
>> easier to access /var/lib/clamav/* than it would be if owned by root.
>
> Why would that be? It is no more work to crack the root account than any
> other account. Nor any less. Hopefully too yo
Sripati Prasad padhy wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Please help me. I have clamav 0.88 installed on my Postfix Mail Server. Can
> I uninstall the rpm & install the new Clamav 0.92 rpm Please help.
>
> Regards,
> Sripati Prasad Padhy
> Mobile - +919818274355
Three things:
1. Please don't top post. Put yo
; thereby not linking to the libclamunrar_iface library in /usr/lib (wrong
> version).
Does this ensure correct linking to libgmp.so.3 and libbz2.so.1?
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
"Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud;
after a while
Konstantin Boyandin wrote:
> Whom could I contact to ask about official mirroring policy?
Luca Gibelli would be a good starting point I think.
--
Brian
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav
Konstantin Boyandin wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> 2008/5/14 Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Konstantin Boyandin wrote:
>>
>> > Whom could I contact to ask about official mirroring policy?
>>
>> Luca Gibelli would be a good starting point I think
I've just downloaded and built 0.93.2 on my RH9 (yes I know) box, but
ended up having to manually adjust the databases as the automatic update
stuff failed.
I had a daily.cld and a main.cvd in /var/lib/clamav, the version of the
.cld file was 7655 and clamav 0.93.1 was happy with it.
On updating
Brandon Perry wrote:
> Just installed 0.93.2 (might have been too early, not all pushes are
> finished). Running freshclam gave me a warning saying that 0.93.1 is the
> recommended version and that 0.93.2 is outdated.
I was about 15 to 20 minutes after you and I got exactly the opposite
message fr
Brian Morrison wrote:
> So, bearing in mind that the package for clamav-db built contained two
> .cvd files and didn't install one of them for some reason, what
> happened? I have not changed the spec file I use to build clamav other
> than editing the version number to be
Brian Morrison wrote:
> Brian Morrison wrote:
>
>> So, bearing in mind that the package for clamav-db built contained two
>> .cvd files and didn't install one of them for some reason, what
>> happened? I have not changed the spec file I use to build clamav other
>&
problem Nigel, 0.93.3 is working here now, but I note
that after 0.93.2 tried to update a manually installed daily.cvd using
cdiffs it seems that clamd crashed when reading in the new file.
I had some problems with the installation of my self-built 0.93.2 rpms,
so maybe that was why?
--
Brian Mor
Nigel Horne wrote:
>> So what was the problem Nigel, 0.93.3 is working here now,
>
> The problem related to a 3rd party library used to load some of the
> signatures used by ClamAV in its database.
OK, at least it was a short lived problem.
>
> I am pleased that 0.93.3 is working for you.
So
Sim wrote:
> Hi!
>
> After first # freshclam
> the# /var/qmail/bin/simscanmk -g
> work without any problem.
>
> # ll
> total 15788
> -rw-r--r-- 1 clamav clamav 930977 Jul 8 10:17 daily.cvd
> -rw-r--r-- 1 clamav clamav 15200793 Jul 8 10:17 main.cvd
> -rw--- 1 clamav clamav
Britto I wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I updated the version 0.92.1 to 0.93.1 by using yum update in my distribution.
Current version is 0.93.3, best you update to that before reporting a
problem.
--
Brian
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit
t; under 20 megabytes I cancelled it.
Well it's not *that* big!
FWIW it built quite happily on my RH9 (I know!) box with no changes
needed to my spec file. As yet I have not actually installed and run
the resulting rpms.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
"Arguing wit
e I then build it on my Linux box. I find that when
doing a package update the database associated with the previous
version is no use because its dependencies are the previous version's
binaries and it will then be removed and must be downloaded in any case.
There is no simple answer.
--
Br
this expected. Yes I do use the --enable-experimental switch when
building.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
"Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud;
after a while you realize you are muddy and the pig is enjoying it."
GnuPG key ID
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:08:11 -0500
Nigel Horne wrote:
> If you don't have access to a
> test machine you can still help us by downloading it and checking that
> it compiles and links on your platform.
I successfully built RPMs in the usual way on my rather old Redhat 9
syste
getting the updates-testing rpms. It's easier on Fedora
than just about any other distro!
--
Brian Morrison
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Help us build a comp
t the same time reporting a local version of
> clamav-0.99.4 (current version, correct?).
It's worth checking that you only have one clamav binary installed,
just to be on the safe side.
--
Brian Morrison
___
clamav-users mailing list
c
doesn't do this on Fedora 27, for me at least. I
wonder if there is some other package version that isn't quite right on
your systems that is different in the RH/Fedora universe.
--
Brian Morrison
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.c
On Fri, 18 May 2018 15:18:06 +
"Joel Esler (jesler)" wrote:
> db.gb was overlooked in the move of db.uk<http://db.uk> to our CDN
> for freshclam. We just moved db.gb over to our CDN. Problem should
> clear itself up shortly.
Sorry Joel, no change here this mo
On Sat, 19 May 2018 12:23:29 +
"Joel Esler (jesler)" wrote:
> Try removing your mirrors.dat.
Fixed itself overnight before I did that, but thanks for the suggestion.
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On May 19, 2018, at 05:45, Brian Morrison wrote:
> &
On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 04:02:58 -0700
Al Varnell wrote:
> Does the evidence available infivsyr that it's the mirrors that are
> out-of-date or is it DNS? Everything I've seen shows that they are
> not in sync, but I'm not sure which get's updated first.
It should not matter if the mirrors are ahead
On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:26:34 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 02.07.2018 um 08:44 schrieb Bill Maidment:
> > Maybe these are dumb questions; if so, please ignore.
> > But doesn't it make more sense to update all the mirrors first,
> > before changing the DNS? Is there some mechanism to do it that wa
On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 19:17:32 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 02.07.2018 um 19:07 schrieb Brian Morrison:
> > On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:26:34 +0200
> > Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >> Am 02.07.2018 um 08:44 schrieb Bill Maidment:
> >>> Maybe these are dumb
On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 19:50:55 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> > For me freshclam runs roughly every 2 hours, so I think that the
> > load is an order of magnitude higher than you state. I will confess
> > that I don't know about the capability of web servers in this
> > regard, but the point that d.net
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 22:45:09 +0200
"Maurizio Caloro" wrote:
>
>
> Nobody knows this?
>
Have a look here. I am not a Debian user so I am unsure of the detail.
https://serverfault.com/questions/798587/debian-8-cant-get-clamav-to-listen-on-tcp-3310
>
>
> Sun Jul 8 22:42:25 2018 -> +++ Sta
-"). The bug does _not_ affect
scanning files given to clamdscan directly on command line.
The bug was reported today by Piotr Gackiewicz.
A fix will be available tomorrow in CVS.
Maybe this is the thing causing your problem?
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
GnuPG key ID D
lk" header is really stupid.
Quite possibly she's using an MUA that doesn't understand the Precedence
header's meaning. Outlook Express perhaps?
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html
24 hours.
So, 12 makes freshclam update every 2 hours and 24 makes it do so every
hour.
Is that clear?
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html
---
This SF.Net em
header
Are you using exiscan? If so I can send you my exim.conf file as an
example of a system using exim and clamav via a Unix socket where clamd
and freshclam work just fine.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html
ter path towards the bottom of the files
> section.
No, just supply --without milter as an argument to the rpmbuild command,
I do:
rpmbuild -bb --without milter clamav.spec
and it just works.
You do need the bzip2-devel package installed though.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 17:42:10 -0400 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Brian Bruns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 07, 2004 2:58 AM [EST], Brian Morrison wrote:
>
> >
> > No, just supply --without milter as an argument to the rpmbuild
> > command, I d
a
similar problem for a few other people, but as yet no explanation as to
what is going on.
I'm running clamav-0.74 built from source rpm.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpn
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:59:32 -0500 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel
J McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 15:04, Brian Morrison wrote:
> > After a hiccough with connectivity where I needed to change the
> > resolv.conf server order and subsequently rev
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 06:42:33 -0500 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel
J McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 17:10, Brian Morrison wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:59:32 -0500 in
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Daniel J McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
mail. The error is below:
>
> Jul 13 13:03:26 mail4 sm-mta[16326]: i6DI3E3a016326: Milter
> (clmilter): local socket name /var/run/clmilter.sock unsafe
> Jul 13 13:03:26 mail4 sm-mta[16326]: i6DI3E3a016326: Milter
> (clmilter): to error state
>
> Any clue?
Permissio
hest-number MX,
> rather than the lowest - precisely to get around the
> most-heavily-armored servers.
So the solution is to make sure that you scan as the mail arrives at
your site, rather than only scanning at your primary MX. In my case I'm
my own primary MX, but that may not appl
nd
freshclam have the usual chkconfig header with the start priority shown
in them, chkconfig makes links to these scripts in /etc/rc.d/rc.d
where is the run level.
Assuming you have clamav-milter set up in the same way then you need to
ensure that clamd starts before it and is killed after it on s
r system you run, all you
need is a simple edit on the .spec file and saving the new source
tarball in the SOURCES directory of the build tree.
More detailed instructions could be written up if you need more than the
suggestion of how to get round this.
--
B
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:54:44 +0200 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Jona Tallieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this normal (difference in version)?
No, it seems you have an old clamscan in your path. You'll need to
replace the old files with the new.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm
oken the link between
bind and the resolver library.
Actually, on further investigation of the failed freshclam strace, there
is no call to libresolv.so at all.
Can anyone explain what happened here? If not, then those of you seeing
the same problem might find a check of your configuration and servi
calls.
OK, but once I got it working the strace output had a line reading
libresolv.so.2 in it that was definitely not there when nscd had managed
to break name resolution.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.u
canRAR
> >
> > Does anybody know if that's still accurate?
>
> The recent version should work fairly good for RAR 2.0 archives.
Recent version means 0.75.1 I presume does it?
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
GnuPG key I
ng chkconfig to ensure it is not
restarted seems to have nailed that.
Your other error looks like a temporary routing problem, but I will say
that my nscd problem was triggered when my DSL connection dropped out
overnight for some reason.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot
On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 16:44:23 -0500 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Steven Stern
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As usual, ClamAV's name came out too soon
You mean that the other AV vendors are too slow, surely?
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
GnuPG key ID D
ine of Received headers, so it never says exactly
> what host it came from.
It was received on the loopback interface surely?
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html
--
1 - 100 of 376 matches
Mail list logo
